Relevated
fixated with venom and phalluses
So I think he won't close flights like Scotland but will introduce checks at airports.
Why the end of the week?Wow.
60k cases announced today, with 830 deaths!
Surely the case numbers will flatten by the end of the week?
I would imagine it would take until next week. People were less likely to get tested during holidays and further restrictions are only starting to have an effect from now.Wow.
60k cases announced today, with 830 deaths!
Surely the case numbers will flatten by the end of the week?
Why the end of the week?
It's been 2.5 weeks since London/S.E went into lockdown, and schools had the Xmas holidays so you would hope that transmission had the breaks put on it
I doubt you are catching over 50% of the cases so in reality you are already over 100k.It will keep rising until the 2nd/3rd week in January. I'm expecting similar case numbers to what we had back in March (around c100k per day).
Just now.Anyone asked why he sent children to school only to shut them yet?
ONS are reporting that 1 in 50householdspeople in the UK had covid between 27th Dec and 2nd Jan. Up by 300k from the week before, where it was 1 in 70.
Yeah and got waffle in response.Anyone asked why he sent children to school only to shut them yet?
Anyone asked why he sent children to school only to shut them yet?
Anyone asked why he sent children to school only to shut them yet?
It’s like being waterboarded with fecking raw sewage. So much shit it’s unbearableYeah and got waffle in response.
When you think how daft a decision that was it's mind blowing. Having an unnecessary mass household mixing event just before a need for full on lockdown. How many spreader events were caused.
Anyone asked why he sent children to school only to shut them yet?
Hopefully they learn from this and don`t allow family mixing next Christmas.
When you think how daft a decision that was it's mind blowing. Having an unnecessary mass household mixing event just before a need for full on lockdown. How many spreader events were caused.
It is notable here that one child infected while displaying symptoms did not transmit the virus when visiting 3 schools.11 Clearly, children are less likely to develop severe complications from the disease, where a significant proportion are asymptomatic/or have subclinical symptoms12 and a meta-analysis shows those <20 years have an odds ratio of 0.56 for being an infected contact compared to those who are older, indicating children are less susceptible compared to adults.14 Evidence suggests children are not the primary source of infection in most household clusters as 9.7% of 31 transmission clusters identified were thought to have children as a paediatric index case.13 Further, transmission between children does not play a vital role in the formation of SSEs with explanations including lower levels of ACE2 present in the nasal epithelium of children compared to adults.
The role of children in the spread of SARS-CoV-2 remains highly controversial. To address this issue, we performed a meta-analysis of the published literature on household SARS-CoV-2 transmission clusters (n=213 from 12 countries). Only 8 (3.8%) transmission clusters were identified as having a paediatric index case. Asymptomatic index cases were associated with a lower secondary attack in contacts than symptomatic index cases (estimate risk ratio [RR], 0.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.09-0.29). To determine the susceptibility of children to household infections the secondary attack rate (SAR) in paediatric household contacts was assessed. The secondary attack rate in paediatric household contacts was lower than in adult household contacts (RR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.42-0.91). These data have important implications for the ongoing management of the COVID-19 pandemic, including potential vaccine prioritization strategies.
40-word summary In household transmission clusters of SARS-CoV-2 children are unlikely to be the index case. Children are also less likely than adults to be infected with SARS-CoV-2 from a family member.
He added that the new coronavirus variant is “transmitting more readily in younger age groups”, but does not appear to be more resistant to the vaccine.
“We know that transmission occurs within schools, we know that a person between 12 and 16 is seven times more likely than others in a household to bring the infection into a household.
“We know that there was a small dip in transmission in school children after the half term,” he said.
Have they changed tune recently or am I imagining that they previously said school kids aren't an issueMeanwhile Sage advisors say children between 12-16 are seven times more likely to bring the virus into households than anybody else.
https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/inew...in-virus-sage-adviser-mark-walport-815659/amp
For these decisions there is a lot of admin and red tape involved. Even though it should be, it isn't simple enough because anyone along the way can pop up and say they disagree with it. You have to get permission from various departments and then a year later Boris implements it for the year after.Can they not just make kids at all levels repeat the year so no one misses out?
I’m sure someone will tell me why that’s a bad idea
Meanwhile Sage advisors say children between 12-16 are seven times more likely to bring the virus into households than anybody else.
https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/inew...in-virus-sage-adviser-mark-walport-815659/amp
“Alas, flubble bubble, errr schools errr and important to errr should stay open but waffle toffle the new lockdown is err thank you I hope that answers your question. Yes, Laura next please“
Various different studies will say various different things. And in fairness to the scientists involved it’s an ever changing picture. That’s why it’s dangerous to state things as fact when it’s anything but.Have they changed tune recently or am I imagining that they previously said school kids aren't an issue