DavidDeSchmikes
Full Member
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2013
- Messages
- 18,984
When I elaborated on what I meant you accused me of changing the goal posts.
Because you wouldn't admit that your original statement was factually incorrect.
Gladly, provided he doesn’t continue to lie about what I said.This is the sixth fecking day of this argument! Can't you two just agree to disagree and leave it at that, so we can just read the updates rather than an aimless debate dragging on into its second week?
can't believe this wasn't posted yet
This is the sixth fecking day of this argument! Can't you two just agree to disagree and leave it at that, so we can just read the updates rather than an aimless debate dragging on into its second week?
Speaking of outdoor crowds. The GAA haven’t exactly played a blinder in this pandemic, have they?
Varadkar striking quite a tone there given the health minister was simultaneously in a press conference saying there was no issue between government and NPHET.
Comes across as him criticising NPHET for rightly staying solely within their remit, which is public health, even after pointing out that is the limit of their remit. Literally not their job to consider social or economic implications.
With the CMO releasing a letter outright saying the government's plan won't work, it's quite a political risk. If it goes wrong then they'll come under heavy fire for ignoring expert health advice. Though if they listened to the advice they'd come under fire for that too.
I think our goal should be to have everything back at level one by early December, which is why I would've been happy for level 4 (I still think level 5 would've been pure madness), which still isn't great, and for selfish reasons it means I can't go away on my already booked week off, but having things open for Christmas would be both amazing for people in general as well as a massive boost to the economy. If people are still told not to leave their counties for Christmas and pubs are still basically closed, they'll be pissed (and not the good pissed!).To be honest, this is how it should work. Scientists issue advice, the government takes that advice on board, considers factors outside the scope of the scientists advice (impact on economy etc) then decides on next steps. I’m always inclined to side with the medics but jumping straight to level 5 would have made a mockery of the whole framework published a few weeks ago. You can’t keep moving the goal-posts and expect the public to buy in to the plan.
Having said that, the absence of a clear plan here is our biggest problem. What is our goal? Without making that clear it’s hard for everyone to stay motivated.
To be honest, this is how it should work. Scientists issue advice, the government takes that advice on board, considers factors outside the scope of the scientists advice (impact on economy etc) then decides on next steps. I’m always inclined to side with the medics but jumping straight to level 5 would have made a mockery of the whole framework published a few weeks ago. You can’t keep moving the goal-posts and expect the public to buy in to the plan.
Having said that, the absence of a clear plan here is our biggest problem. What is our goal? Without making that clear it’s hard for everyone to stay motivated.
My main issue is Varadkar. I don't think generating "Varadkar criticises Holohan" stories about clear tensions between government ans NPHET helps, especially when his colleagues were trying to downplay the idea of any rift.
But yeah, the idea any NPHET advice would be weighed against socio-economic consequences was already layed out by government, as far as I'm aware. So it's not like they were intending to be forever tied to their advice. Big few weeks ahead though given Holohan is outright stating the government plan won't work. 1600-2300 new cases by Nov. 7th if the current trend continues, apparently.
To be honest, this is how it should work. Scientists issue advice, the government takes that advice on board, considers factors outside the scope of the scientists advice (impact on economy etc) then decides on next steps. I’m always inclined to side with the medics but jumping straight to level 5 would have made a mockery of the whole framework published a few weeks ago. You can’t keep moving the goal-posts and expect the public to buy in to the plan.
Having said that, the absence of a clear plan here is our biggest problem. What is our goal? Without making that clear it’s hard for everyone to stay motivated.
Greater Manchester's amended figures for the week to 2nd October. For Manchester itself, the huge leap is in the university halls of residence areas - about 55% of cases are in 18-21 year olds, mostly asymptomatic or with minimal symptoms.
The same effect is probably happening in places like Salford, where there are also high student numbers - I suspect we may see jumps there once the testing ramps up.![]()
Even if you have a complete lockdown and get it to a point of close to elimination then you have to be prepared to have ongoing control put in place for small outbreaks. There will be ongoing outbreaks that have to be contained. Regional limited restrictions cant be avoided. Its the nature of the beast. The biggest problem is getting general by in from the majority of the population, I think thats almost more difficult than the control measures, getting the public onboard.We cant keep going in and out of hiding from this.
We need either a total and utter lock down to crush this or carry on as we are.
I am firmly of the belief that the economic damage and potential job losses and financial strain will cause more long term issues and mental health problems.
So we have to find a balance until science rescues us.
Allegedly the test and trace system uses xls files (possibly due to a csv import step) perhaps just because they're clueless. But quite probably because a lot of NHS trusts haven't been able to upgrade systems since Excel 2003 ruled the roost.
From a basic techie perspective, data import from multiple sources is always an issue - which is why you write database imports that crosscheck that the correct number of records gets added each time. Obviously not if you're world beaters though.
Actually what we need to do is find a way to enforce mask wearing and other common sense measures that big proportions of numpties are ignoring, if we could do that we’d not need to entertain the idea of a lockdownWe cant keep going in and out of hiding from this.
We need either a total and utter lock down to crush this or carry on as we are.
I am firmly of the belief that the economic damage and potential job losses and financial strain will cause more long term issues and mental health problems.
So we have to find a balance until science rescues us.
Yeah I read this on the Serco/Excel cock up yesterday. Clowns
Allegedly the error, that saw test results go missing from the test and trace record keeping system last week, is that it uses xls files (possibly due to a csv import step) perhaps just because they're clueless. But quite possibly because a lot of NHS trusts haven't been able to upgrade systems since Excel 2003 ruled the roost.
From a basic techie perspective, data import from multiple sources is always an issue - which is why you write database imports that crosscheck that the correct number of records gets added each time. Obviously not if you're world beaters though. Which begs the question really - have they actually written an Excel database app rather than used an actual database?
Allegedly the error, that saw test results go missing from the test and trace record keeping system last week, is that it uses xls files (possibly due to a csv import step) perhaps just because they're clueless. But quite possibly because a lot of NHS trusts haven't been able to upgrade systems since Excel 2003 ruled the roost.
From a basic techie perspective, data import from multiple sources is always an issue - which is why you write database imports that crosscheck that the correct number of records gets added each time. Obviously not if you're world beaters though. Which begs the question really - have they actually written an Excel database app rather than used an actual database?
If the Sky report that @CassiusClaymore linked is accurate, then there is a real database at the top of the food chain. The Excel section may have been an intermediate step used when preparing csv and similar stuff for upload.The problem is not that the tech is two decades old, the problem is that they have not used a database. Databases are critical for any data which you cannot afford to risk losing.
Remarkable that such errors are happening at such level. Any tech student could have told you what I just wrote.
We cant keep going in and out of hiding from this.
We need either a total and utter lock down to crush this or carry on as we are.
I am firmly of the belief that the economic damage and potential job losses and financial strain will cause more long term issues and mental health problems.
So we have to find a balance until science rescues us.
Full disclosure. I just dropped my kids off at school. I didn’t wear a mask. I never do outdoors. I think the risk of anyone picking up an infection standing near someone outdoors is slim to none.
But that’s the problem. You’re suggesting two extreme approaches. That’s not balance. Finding a balance is incredibly difficult. Even more so when the populace is so split. Whatever approach we take will piss off half the country and there’s a good chance that the pissed off 50% (or whatever the exact % is) will sabotage the outcome (I actually suspect this is contributing to the second wave; people blatantly not even trying to social distance) It’s a nightmare and I don’t see any easy way out.
The complete crushing appeals because its at least a clear goal, with a definite outcome. But I don’t know how we do that as one country in an inter-dependant region like the EU (and an island with a land border with a separate state, in which the virus is running riot). I can’t even begin to think of what would be involved in isolating ourselves from the UK and the rest of Europe if we went with a zero covid approach. In fact, I don’t think it’s possible. So we are where we are. Up shit’s creek.
Yeah I read this on the Serco/Excel cock up yesterday. Clowns
What about the signalling power of it though? I thought at first it was a sign of fear / danger in society but surely it's better to just see it as a sign of caution. I'm coming around to the Asian mask culture myself. Sure we don't have the air quality issues so wearing it all the time would be silly, but why not make it a norm in airports when it's so well accepted that people pick up colds and the like on planes, or when it's flu season why not encourage mask use?
I do see it now as a signal that people are taking things seriously. Not that they aren't taking it seriously if they aren't wearing a mask, but you don't know. So why not be helpful and let people know? Other than when you have an unruly beard I don't think you can really make the case that it's unreasonably uncomfortable.
....and stop selling off licence alcohol thats fueling the house parties!Actually what we need to do is find a way to enforce mask wearing and other common sense measures that big proportions of numpties are ignoring, if we could do that we’d not need to entertain the idea of a lockdown
I cant ever see a Zero Covid approach here. We are fecked. If we go to level 5 again the impact on people and the economy will be deep and long lasting. If we let Covid run its course it will be carnage as well.
I am taking it day by day. Working from home and not seeing anyone other than my kids and the parents I say hello to at the school drop offs and pick ups.
If the Sky report that @CassiusClaymore linked is accurate, then there is a real database at the top of the food chain. The Excel section may have been an intermediate step used when preparing csv and similar stuff for upload.
It is basic stuff, a silly mistake to make and a disturbing one not to be noticed immediately, the first time an upload threw up errors - which of course makes you wonder about the error checking.
I genuinely believe Boris was on the way to achieving this early on in the fiasco. The turning point in my attitude and many others from what i saw, was when CUMMINGS was rumbled going against government advice and was defended by Boris, rather than publicly shamed.Even if you have a complete lockdown and get it to a point of close to elimination then you have to be prepared to have ongoing control put in place for small outbreaks. There will be ongoing outbreaks that have to be contained. Regional limited restrictions cant be avoided. Its the nature of the beast. The biggest problem is getting general by in from the majority of the population, I think thats almost more difficult than the control measures, getting the public onboard.
We cant keep going in and out of hiding from this.
We need either a total and utter lock down to crush this or carry on as we are.
I am firmly of the belief that the economic damage and potential job losses and financial strain will cause more long term issues and mental health problems.
So we have to find a balance until science rescues us.
What is our goal?