Redstain
Full Member
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2019
- Messages
- 2,055
Permanently would be niceHe has been for while.
Bit harsh. He’s been left with garbage players. A sulking Rashford who thinks he deserves to start every week despite being awful. A couple of over aged midfielders. Strikers who can’t finish their dinner. Injury prone players. A keeper that can’t handle corners and makes mistake time after time.He's already making excuses like Ten Hag. Not enough time on the training pitch, I need new signings etc. A coach has to get the best out of what's available to him first and foremost and he's not doing it so far.
He hasnt said he wanted new signings. And no one coach can get the best of his team without signing players who suit his system. Such a dumb viewpoint.He's already making excuses like Ten Hag. Not enough time on the training pitch, I need new signings etc. A coach has to get the best out of what's available to him first and foremost and he's not doing it so far.
It looks like he doesn't have the athleticism that's required. Also, we played a 3 in midfield yesterday after Bruno went off so can't use that to judge anything really.Why is Eriksen no option at 10? He used to be world class at 10, and he is still pretty damn good at it when he plays for Denmark. He is no pivot player. He wasn´t very good yesterday in the Bruno role, but we gained a lot more composure and control with him playing in a more forward role despite being a man down.
Just parroting the same things in threads across the forum. I’m tired Robbie.He has been for while.
Agree, our levels have dropped so low, that a player surplus to Bayern's requirements comes in shames up our squad by being levels better.
Ugarte and Mazraoui were outs at PSG and Bayern not because they are bad or average players. The former just didn't fit the PSG system and the latter had issues with the club hierarchy.Ugarte can’t get a game at a poor PSG side and is instantly our best player. Maybe we need to target more bench players at big clubs? Because that’s how far we’ve fallen.
He hasnt said he wanted new signings. And no one coach can get the best of his team without signing players who suit his system. Such a dumb viewpoint.
Ugarte and Mazraoui were outs at PSG and Bayern not because they are bad or average players. The former just didn't fit the PSG system and the latter had issues with the club hierarchy.
Ugarte was average, it was definitely the quality of his performances that eventually cost him his place.
Nothing will ever change if this club always puts money first before football.
Think pre-season tours are fine if the players do actually get fit, a number of pundits are very fairly saying about our lack of stamina. It is alright saying these games are to build up fitness, if that ends up the case. You seem to get a lot of games where one team is taking it seriously and it isn't ours.Is the grass in Carrington so special, that players can't be trained on tactic at other country's grass?
Agreed. INEOS have done what the Glazers did since SAF retired. Switch from one style to another with no overarching plan. Madness. It's fine to expect to change things up but to go from 0 to 100 in difference is silly.Successful Clubs don’t buy players for managers , they buy it for a system that will be generally maintained if a manager is replaced. It’s not that managers don’t get to sometimes pick a player to sign or aren’t involved in the process but the club should have its own transfer policy separate from managers.
This idea that ETH or Ole or Jose etc are the problem needs to stop. A club is responsible for putting the squad together to help a manager/coach achieve their goals. A manager can be involved but they are not responsible for finding players and signing them. United has never helped any of our managers put really strong squads together.
There’s plenty of evidence that the club regularly signed players well down the list of targets and panics signed players for different reasons, one being our managers always inherit unbalanced squads that need emergency recruits.
Slot didn’t just waltz into Pool and make it work cause he’s a genius, he inherited a strong squad that’s part of a strong football infrastructure that has a longer term plan that doesn’t require entire rebuilds when it replaces its manager.
Why did United hire Amorim? Was it because he was the big new name on the block or does his football style represent the longer term goals of the club. If it’s longer term goals then fine, it will take time. If it’s cause he’s the emperors new clothes of managers and we may end up with a coach with a completely different style in 2 years , then the club is no better off under INEOs who have learned nothing from Glazer dysfunction.
A coach having a definable style is grand but you can’t be buying players for that style and then changing it every 2-3 years. So as a mate of mine says , if Amorim was replaced sometime by end of season and United hired a completely different coach , we are well and truly f**ked.
We aren’t here because ETH signed all these players , we are here because the club hired a manager and gave them a squad in turmoil and then the club spent poorly on making the team stronger. It’s been the same since Moyes. Whether or not managers have been good enough, United’s recruitment and squad management has been consistently awful.
That is half true but it is also fair to say that he was a poor fit for the system at PSG which can happen with the best of players and is neither down to a failure of the player or of the coaching staff. Both Ugarte and PSG recognized this and parted company amicably after one season. His performances were excellent for Sporting and in the same system under the same coach there is no reason he won't perform at a high level here because the fit between the tactical setup and his best attributes is strong.
Agreed. The world tour has been happening as far back as I can remember. We didn't suffer because of this under SAF. Now managers, players, and fans using this as an excuse of disastrous follow=up season. United aren't the only club doing world tour.Think pre-season tours are fine if the players do actually get fit, a number of pundits are very fairly saying about our lack of stamina. It is alright saying these games are to build up fitness, if that ends up the case. You seem to get a lot of games where one team is taking it seriously and it isn't ours.
The tools can't be downed when they weren’t skillful enough to operate them in the first place.The worry is we’ve seen this before.. team is in a free fall. We know this team, we know the tools are or will soon be downed. Can he even survive until the summer?
I apologize for not agreeing with you entirely, it won't happen again.The reason he wasn't a good fit for the system is the same reason he wouldn't be a good fit for nearly all top teams, he is a liability in transition against any decent team and his defensive positioning is often suspect. He has a very good engine and can definitely tackle with the best of them but he doesn't defend through positioning, he doesn't deter most moves or passes, in possession he isn't going to help you effectively beat the press or distribute the ball around a well positioned team. For all intent and purposes today, he is the 2024 version of Mamadou Diarra, now he is young enough to maybe develop into something better but today he is bang average.
It's not the grass that is special, it's the number of media events the players and managers are expected to do while on tour.Is the grass in Carrington so special, that players can't be trained on tactic at other country's grass?
Didn't we just go to one country under Fergie? Our tours seem to be a lot more intense now with more focus on commercial activity.Agreed. The world tour has been happening as far back as I can remember. We didn't suffer because of this under SAF. Now managers, players, and fans using this as an excuse of disastrous follow=up season. United aren't the only club doing world tour.
Are they really that different? Wing backs is the main difference. Amorim himself constantly plays down the formation questions because they are nonsense. Ten hags team were actually quite good pressers at different times in his tenure. Ten hag moved to try to play more in transition in the middle of his time here. A structure should prevent something like that happening.Agreed. INEOS have done what the Glazers did since SAF retired. Switch from one style to another with no overarching plan. Madness. It's fine to expect to change things up but to go from 0 to 100 in difference is silly.
I apologize for not agreeing with you entirely, it won't happen again.
We were, I believe my tongue in cheek admission to being schooled was lost in the sterility of a typed message.And I apologize for thinking that we were exchanging opinions amicably. It won't happen again.
We were, I believe my tongue in cheek admission to being schooled was lost in the sterility of a typed message.
Yes. We were playing basketball under ETH and now we're playing possession football.Are they really that different? Wing backs is the main difference. Amorim himself constantly plays down the formation questions because they are nonsense. Ten hags team were actually quite good pressers at different times in his tenure. Ten hag moved to try to play more in transition in the middle of his time here. A structure should prevent something like that happening.
Martinez has had the same issues in a back four two. The issues with him are his lack of height, physicallity & lack of pace. It has little do with the system. Infact, the system should ideally help him because it can cover some of those limitations better than a back four.Martinez isn't great at defending wide channels. Mainoo is a dynamic 8 whose skill set is under-utilized and defensive weakness exposed as one of the 2 central mids (if anything, he'd probably be more suited to the left-sided 10).
Amad is a right winger who should stay right. Bruno is a central attacking midfielder who should stay central. The wide 10s, imo, doesn't afford Amad enough space and forces Bruno wide.
Not to mention, the formation has forced Garnacho out. I know he's frustrating, but he's one of our more talented/promising attackers. Even if he does play, the wide 10 position forces him to be more technical, which isn't his game.
I agree that there are bigger problems than the system, but the system isn't helping matters.
You are right. That's why I said we need to see a massive improvement in performances. By the end of the season it should look like we are moving in the right direction & Amo deserves investment. Otherwise, he gets the marching orders & we try someone else. I like him very much but he has to show that he can walk the talk.Only problem is that finishing 13th or 14th this season doesn't offer any guarantees that it won't be the same shit next season also.
Getting better gradually is more realistic and sustainable than being top 5 after you were bottom 6.
This is almost as funny as the posters who are questioning him after 2 months at the club. I’d imagine those posters have probably never been to OT in their life but a diehard keyboard warrior
i mean this is a bit of a heavy and somber take of something so clearly daft? Think the idiots questioning him already are on a totally different planet.This is almost as funny as the posters who are questioning him after 2 months at the club. I’d imagine those posters have probably never been to OT in their life but a diehard keyboard warrior
What kind of a nonsensical post is this? Are you a WUM? Mate just chill.Ruben Amorim is increasingly looking like another mistake. A good coach must get a tune out of the existing players while awaiting additional signings to consolidate the team. Amorim seems out of his depth already, he's proving the Portuguese league is way way below the EPL standards. Accepted, the squad is not the best quality however he seems to have suddenly made them poorer. The whole should always be more than the sum of parts, not less. Never less. I personally have issues with the 3-4-3 formation, I don't believe it would work in the EPL however wolves' new coach deployed it to perfection yesterday so a lot of fingers should now be pointed at Ruben Amorim. If he's lucky, he'll get some money to spend in January and bring in HIS players but if results don't improve immediately, I'll only hope Sir Jim Ratcliffe negotiated a low payoff into Amorim's contract. For me, we need a coach with EPL experience; Silva, Iraola, Emery or Frank for a start. Worried.
The issue is here is that we are in a relegation battle so it would make sense to get someone in like Dyche or Allardyce to keep us up.All these weird opinions of needing a PL proven manager, as if it’s a proven thing to get teams to win the league, and then offer up names of blokes with so little big club experience.