Look carefully, if you notice Ruud changed his direction and he was slow that twat Keown (it was Arsenal no 5 really) wouldve gotten in front of him either to tackle or just to swipe the ball away.
Ruud was quick by the 2000's standard. You need to understand the other 9s of that era were as slow as nail (Vieri, Inzaghi, Shearer, Morientes, etc) meanwhile you'd struggle to see no. 9 as quick as ruud maybe Ronaldo was the only no. 9 quicker than him.
Henry wasn't a typical no 9 but was lightning quick. Young Shearer was quick but not by then.
Andy Cole was very quick, Jamaican blood.
Michael Owen, Anelka, Ronaldo R9, Drogba, Rooney, Eto, Torres, Defoe were all quicker than RVN.
RVN wasn't known as being fast.
Just great awareness, clever movement, quick feet, finishing etc.
He might've been fast over the first 5 yards maybe.
You'd never see him beat a man. I'm not sure he even ran onto through balls that often.
Anyway, it's a moot point. My original point is that RH and RVN aren't similar.
RH seems to have proper pace. Let's hope he stays injury free and we see the best of him.
I had high hopes for Martial but he never seemed to hit any kind of consistent form.