NotChatGPT
Brownfinger
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2023
- Messages
- 1,872
The team and by extension Rashford play better when we have a striker who drops deep and gets involved in build-up play. Rashford's uptake in form when Lukaku and Ronaldo respectively left is not an anomaly.
WW offered nothing when dropped deep. He was just clumsy.
I think someone already posted Rashford goals, I didn't check that but the conclusion was there was almost no involvement of WW.
He did a great job holding the ball up, drawing the back line out, and creating space for Rashford and others to run into. His ability with his back to goal was very good and helped the team retain possession. The conclusion was that Wout didn't directly assist Rashford so my assessment must be wrong, even though his and Martial's involvement from deep opened up the space needed for Rashford to score those goals.
He did none of that. If anything Hojlund does lot better job by playing decent pass and also with his pace, ability to carry the ball.
What you said about WW happened for couple of games and then he looked like a horse trying to control the ball. He was so clumsy.
His numbers for shot-creating actions, progressive passes, and passes attempted were and are higher than Højlund's for both United and Atalanta. His ball retention numbers are also better. Højlund is a better out-and-out goal scorer, and his ball-carrying stats show that he is physically way better than Wout.
His ball carry stats are better as he is a better dribbler and has pace. Also Hojlund has better pass completion percentage than WW.
Fair enough about other stats but on pitch his contribution was nothing for unleashing Rashford.
Interesting. I’ve noticed that myself. But it could be a purely tactical thing coming from ETH as we like to get the wingers extra space on the ballCole said his first instinct is always to fight the centre half and he just couldn’t understand why. That the goal of a centre forward is to find space, which involves not being close to the centre half.
A lot of Rashford's goals come from runs in behind. He makes those runs when he's playing out wide or up front, when we have a striker who drops deep or we have one who doesn't. The difference in how he performs comes down to how often/well he makes the runs, how often we can/do make the pass and what he actually does with the ball when the pass is made. To put so much of his downturn in form on Hojlund's role is bizarre.The team and by extension Rashford play better when we have a striker who drops deep and gets involved in build-up play. Rashford's uptake in form when Lukaku and Ronaldo respectively left is not an anomaly.
A lot of Rashford's goals come from runs in behind. He makes those runs when he's playing out wide or up front, when we have a striker who drops deep or we have one who doesn't. The difference in how he performs comes down to how often/well he makes the runs, how often we can/do make the pass and what he actually does with the ball when the pass is made. To put so much of his downturn in form on Hojlund's role is bizarre.
Iirc Weghorst ended up playing in the number 10 position with a striker ahead of him quite often.
I agree. He’s been a good impact sub recently but the game will likely be out of sight by the time it comes to that.
That's the spirit
He didn't do it at Atalanta, so it must be an instruction from the coaching team.Interesting. I’ve noticed that myself. But it could be a purely tactical thing coming from ETH as we like to get the wingers extra space on the ball
Interesting. I’ve noticed that myself. But it could be a purely tactical thing coming from ETH as we like to get the wingers extra space on the ball
You put the primary blame on Hojlund though, that's what the conversation has been about.Rashford's decline in form can be attributed to several factors, with the primary issue being his codependent partnership with Shaw. However, the team as a whole seems to be less cohesive offensively compared to last season. Ignoring Højlund's technical shortcomings as a contributing factor to this is bizarreto me.
Yeah he looked a yard quicker and a lot stronger today. Genuinely outpaced City players a few times which we hadn't seen from him in a while. We really need a rotation option for him or at least consider the Bruno false 9 option more often so Hojlund can be used more sparingly.Makes me think all the more the physicality and amount of games has taken its toll on him.
That’s similar to his performances at the start and when he came on against Arsenal.
Did more in his cameo than haaland did in the whole game?
I know the ogre feck hit the bar but that was a first time shot from a deflected cut back, did fcuk all else but fall over everytime the ball went near him
Almost spit my coffee out laughing when Kobbie completely outmuscled the big lump
He set the stall out in the first few minutes. 8ft yeti haaland throwing himself to the floor under pressure from 4ft martinez was embarrassing. He didn't fancy it today at all
Rasmus came on and immediately set about putting a mark on them. Despite not starting he applied himself brilliantly