The funny thing about posts like these is they are more wrong than those that write off players.
In the last five years alone there have been posters that have written off Antony, Dan James, Pereira, Elanga, Lukaku, Dean Henderson off in their first season as starters or regulars. We’ve gotten the usual, they are young and have great potential defence but time has proven the doubters correct and this consistently happens on the caf.
The crowd that writes players off is more right than those choosing to believe in potential that doesn’t exist.
Funny enough as vocal as I’ve been on Hojlund, I’m not totally writing him off but he has no business being a starter in this team. Anyone banking on him to lead us up front next season is in for a rude awakening, he’s nowhere near good enough at the moment.
Saying "I see a potential in him" is obviously just a saying, because as we all know all those young players read Redcafe and we don't wand them to feel bad.
Hojlund has a lot of credit in the bank for the goals he scored last season. Main problem is, he wasn't doing much / anything else on the pitch. Now you might say "strikers main job is to score goals", what is true, but are still any teams actually playing out and out finishers? Those days are gone I believe.
Second problem is that betting on a striker to have an amazing goalscoring record every season is a bad strategy. Those streaks can happen, but does this mean an "average" season (in terms of scoring against his chances) is going to be considered a poor one for Hojlund? I don't think that's fair for any player, let alone a young one.
To be brutally honest, I don't see much potential to grow in Hojlund. He might as well have reached his ceiling (due to his limitations) and will only get better slightly as he matures and has more experience. The truth is he's not an academy player who can still "work on his technique, heading ability and improve hold up play". I see those elements as his weaknesses and I don't think we can expect him to get better than "average" at it. I think part of the natural ability on the ball is lacking and just like with Antony and his right foot, this isn't fair to expect those elements to be improved significantly at his age.
Maybe if he can get those elements to a ok level over the next 2-3 years and we'll be alright, I'm not too bothered. But the fact is he still needs to keep scoring 1,2 per 1xG point, that's what'll put him in above average category.
That's a totally different story if we paid reasonabe fee for him, but we didn't (not his fault of course).