Agree 100% and you've hit the nail on the head for me. This was similar to my original point, really, but on the other side of the debate. Labelling someone as racist for pointing out some terms are not okay to describe black players specifically is not correct either.
I think we have a tendency in public discourse today to want to group everyone into one of two groups on opposite sides of the spectrum. In this particular debate on the extremes we have either;
- Example in OP is definitely racist
- There is nothing in this, and there is no wider issue in football either.
To me the truth lies somewhere in the middle. There is no discernible way we can label this as racist with certainty, but also we cannot dismiss this issue as something that 100% doesn't exist in football. I'd argue that most people lie somewhere between those two extremes, but sometimes the debate is framed as if most people are in one camp or the other. If you lie closer to one side you tend to put the people on the other side to the extreme (I tend to do this myself). This is all confused by a rather vague and isolated example in the OP, which could easily be nothing (which goes back to your point about overcompensating being wrong).