The Firestarter
Full Member
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2010
- Messages
- 31,067
You don't seem understand the connotations of the word specimen.Pogba is a great athlete.
Shit, did I just say something racist there?
You don't seem understand the connotations of the word specimen.Pogba is a great athlete.
Shit, did I just say something racist there?
Are people really getting upset that someone said Pogba and Kouyate are good physical specimens? Jesus, get a fcking life
Nah. You're just accusing a couple of people of racism without good reason.You don't seem understand the connotations of the word specimen.
You don't seem understand the connotations of the word specimen.
Who have I accused of anything?Nah. You're just accusing a couple of people of racism without good reason.
True, and when you think about it, football is rife with stereotypes — racial, cultural and national — old and new — and they can be quite pernicious for those that don't fit the preconceived mold in a precise way. Spaniards are supposed to be small and nifty as a rule of thumb (even Ander was classified by some as a techno-midget despite having more in common with stereotypical English midfielders), Brazilians attackers are (or at least were) joyous proponents of the dazzling Joga Bonito style but quite high-maintenance and flighty and their defenders are terrible in terms of their actual defensive skill set (and curiously enough, Pogba's skill set would be celebrated if he was a Brazilian - rather than a Frenchman - and there'd be less of a focus on his “physical specimen” status), Germans are/were efficient and determined with great fighting spirit but rather uninspiring and mechanical, Italian teams are always defensive with a Catenaccio spirit and the players are theatrical cheats, Latin/African players are mercenaries, the handful of Asian players in top clubs illicit a patronizing and dismissive LOWUT response for the most part — by virtue of being neither “physical specimens” nor technically fantastic, etc. Wrt. Pogba, another thing that always grates is that folks had this lazy idea that he's the second coming of Vieira as a box-to-box battler because of superficial similarities and the fact that he's French — and that lingers on even though he's more of a skillful and technically gifted player from midfield, first and foremost — and made his name as one at Juventus.British players get a similar treatment on this forum.
I honestly find this whole debate pretty stupid. Dangerous almost. Commentators can't comment on the athleticism of athletes now without being branded as racists. Calling someone racist is a pretty serious accusation.Jesus dude.Its ok if you don't agree but come on.
I don't think I do either. There's a guy at my work who we call "the specimen" (he's always in the gym, eats terribly boring food all the time and looks like a Men's Health model). I just know it to mean a really muscle bound bloke.
Am I being an accidental racist?
No. But is he black? I think thats where its murky waters. I think the example in the thread isnt completely clear cut, but using those certain buzzwords like "specimen" with a black player is going to raise eyebrows.
That's a different context.I don't think I do either. There's a guy at my work who we call "the specimen" (he's always in the gym, eats terribly boring food all the time and looks like a Men's Health model). I just know it to mean a really muscle bound bloke.
Am I being an accidental racist?
It's hard to keep up. Specimen is a racist term now. Noted.
The term has long been applied to humans of all races.Well I dont know, perhaps you could go find the nearest black man and call him a specimen and tell us how he responded.
Somehow the last few posts brought an association with that movie "Get out"
Yeah.It does kinda remind me of the scene at the dinner table where the son is assuming the main character is athletic and using the term "beast" instead of "specimen"
It's ok to say it about white athletes. Just not black athletes. Cos racism.Aren't Ronaldo and Bale also called great athletes?
The term has long been applied to humans of all races.
It's ok to say it about white athletes. Just not black athletes. Cos racism.
Was wondering the same, I don't think it is that hard to get?Are you being deliberately obtuse?
Are you being deliberately obtuse?
No. But is he black? I think thats where its murky waters. I think the example in the thread isnt completely clear cut, but using those certain buzzwords like "specimen" with a black player is going to raise eyebrows.
I genuinely never even considered there was a racial element to the term at all. The "specimen" at my work is not black.
When I see someone like Ronaldo or Akinfenwa take their shirt off so everyone can drink in their pecs, I'll often think or say "that's a specimen" without even a thought of their race, they're all vain twats to me!
I genuinely never even considered there was a racial element to the term at all. The "specimen" at my work is not black.
When I see someone like Ronaldo or Akinfenwa take their shirt off so everyone can drink in their pecs, I'll often think or say "that's a specimen" without even a thought of their race, they're all vain twats to me!
f you are going to argue against the OP and the consensus of this thread, prove that Pogba's game is reliant on athleticism, as opposed to skill, I do not agree commentators are overtly being racist, nor do I agree that it's an agenda, but I feel it's a gross oversight and ignorance when it comes to many tall black players to constantly refer to their athleticism, when their athleticism is not their greatest asset.
Have to say, you'd pay to watch Kouyate against Pogba, wouldn't you? ... Those are two of the liveliest, most athletic specimens in our league. Great athletes the pair of them.
I think we're in a strange time. White people under 40 have generally been taught from childhood to understand that all people are equal and don't see any differences between black people and white people or any other race for that matter. We treat them all the same. But now were being bombarded with the idea that other races are actually different and should be treated differently. Calling a white person a physical specimen is ok. But calling a black person isn't. It's now considered racist to treat all people the sameI genuinely never even considered there was a racial element to the term at all. The "specimen" at my work is not black.
When I see someone like Ronaldo or Akinfenwa take their shirt off so everyone can drink in their pecs, I'll often think or say "that's a specimen" without even a thought of their race, they're all vain twats to me!
Commentators remarking on two really athletic players being great athletes is racist? If the comments were directed at Shaun Wright Phillips and Jay Jay Okocha there might be something in it, but people mention Pogba's athleticism and Lukaku's power because they are some of the best attributes those players have.
Where did the commentator say Pogbas game is reliant on physicality?
I'm under no illusion these generalisations exist, but on this occasion, it seems to me to be a mere observation on what was actually happening in the game. There was a bit of a battle going on between the two of them.
I think we're in a strange time. White people under 40 have generally been taught from childhood to understand that all people are equal and don't see any differences between black people and white people or any other race for that matter. We treat them all the same. But now were being bombarded with the idea that other races are actually different and should be treated differently. Calling a white person a physical specimen is ok. But calling a black person isn't. It's now considered racist to treat all people the same
Elaborate please
Not to nitpick, but Pogba isn’t that muscular - he’s just ripped as feck.
And yes, the OP is correct, imo.
Oh so it’s covert racism? That explains it all then.Nobody is saying that it's out of order to call someone white an athlete but not someone who is black. To think that is you being a) stupid or b) ignorant for the purpose of wumming. The argument is the manner in which black and white athletes are portrayed in the media by pundits and commentators alike. When looking at footballers a lazy and ignorant stance by many is to suggest that black players possess a physical prowess unmatched by their counterparts, completely ignoring the other aspects of their game such as someone like Yaya Toure who was technically excellent.
It's common for them to attribute terms like "glides past players" in terms of white footballers compared to black footballers also which is a slight tweak in commentary because it's a stereotype in how they're perceived to be built.
In regards to the OP I don't think that the commentator was being intentionally racist in his use of the word specimen, it's a result of the environment he works in where it's a common theme to use these buzzwords when looking at certain races/nationalities and it's wrong.
Expected, with such posts in it.Oh so it’s covert racism? That explains it all then.
I’m 43 and in all that I have never ever heard anybody bring up the word “specimen” or the context of the word as racist.
You can write it in all the ways you want to justify what the OP is insinuating. It’s not racism in anyway shape or form.
I will tell you this, I know for a FACT that Man City and the way they went about searching for youth players was: young, black, African, athletic,
They believed it was easier to turn an athlete into a footballer.
That was until Txiki joined city and the targets changed due to the Messi, iniesta, xavi era.
They decided it was better to search for young, European, smaller, technical players.
This thread is an embarrassment to humanity. It’s insulting to all the people in the world who fight, on a daily basis, against racism.
Not just black people, racism is not just about black People.
Ronaldo is Portuguese, he is olive skinned and yes he is a beast, a perfect athletic specimen.
So is that racist according to the OP?
You seem to be implying that people no longer get stereotyped due to the colour of their skin and/or racism is no longer an issue. This is clearly not the case.
The OP seems a bit over the top (to me, anyway) but a lot of the responses are surprisingly wide of the mark too.