kouroux
45k posts to finally achieve this tagline
We reward mediocrity at our club
Its the biggest disease of our board.We reward mediocrity at our club
Kante is not a CB. A starting CB bought at the same time was John Stones and he cost £50m which is almost twice the 30m we paid for Bailly. The price tag wasnt a bargain but people should not act like we bought a top quality CB30m in 2016 was decent money! Kante was signed for that much the same year after a title winning season and world class performances.
Its funny how you are referring to his 4th season, when Bailly has barely been here for 2.5 seasons. Its obvious you are trying to stretch perspective to make a your point seem more important than it is.Bailly will entering his 4th season next season. How long do we wait for potential? He wasn’t some teenager when we signed him. It’s Phil Jones situation all over again.
What does that have to do with everything?
I said your comments didn't appear lately, but during his good form which was almost one year ago, and then I searched for your posts praising him and those were coincidentally from that period, and would eventually happen again once we face shit opposition, you will come here saying same shit again how he is usually good when fit and better than our other CBs.
Why on earth would Woodward refuse to sell Rojo or Jones for feck sake? You're talking shite.
Of course you bloody would! In your book everything wrong at United can only be 'down to Mourinho" Which is just to fecking stupid if you actually play attention to what happens with our relationship recruitment...I can buy Woodward saying no to Mourinho wanting to get rid of Pogba and Martial, I can't see him refusing to sell Darmian.
It took Klopp how long to replace the likes of Mignolet and Lovren as first choice at Pool? Even Pep it took him till Laporte last January to find the type of CB he wanted to build his defense aroun? It took him two seasons to replace a goal keeper. But suddenly Mourinho 'didn't do his home work' for taking this long to ask for them to be replaced. Worse he is some how to blame for them still being at the club yet he asked for new CBS and defenders in the summer?And if Mourinho had done his homework he'd have known Jones and Rojo and Darmian weren't good enough when he first took the job. They should have been moved on years ago.
its funny how you have selectively picked signings by some arbitrary criteria of teams that have been in the CL semis as if those teams got there on the strength of defenders bought in 2016. Ramos was bought for a record fee as a teenager 13yrs ago but now he is relevant to compare him to bailly's signing? Its ridiculous how low some are willing to stoop.When Bailly was signed in 2016, only 3 or 4 CBs were signed for higher price.
Liverpool also paid less than 5 million for their other CB and 7 million for their LB and RB is from academy.
Teams who made it to semi finals for CL last season and Bayern.
Liverpool
Van Dijk - 75 million
Gomez - 3-5 million
Lovren - 20 million
Robertson - 7 Million
TAA - Academy player
Roma
Juan Jesus - 10 million euros
Kolarov -5 million Euros
Fazio - 3.2 million Euros
Manolas - 15 million Euros
Florenzi - Academy
Madrid
Ramos - 27 million Euros
Varane - 10 million Euros
Marcelo - 5-6 million
Carvajal - 6 million
Bayern
Hummels - 38 million
Sule - 18 million
Kimmich - 7 million
Alaba - Academy
Barcelona (everyone signed after we signed Bailly)
Semedo - 35 million
Umtiti - 25 million euros
Lenglet - 35 million Euros
Only Madrid signed most of their defenders long back and rest all signed the players just 2-3 years ago.
How does price even decide whether player is starting material, Liverpool signed Salah for 35 million, guess he isn't starting material.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.th...united-veto-jose-mourinho-wishlist-cash-fears
Am I ?
I'll even quote the this gem from the article verbatim, with information Woodward was all too eager to give the pressure the day the transfer window shut:
"....To Mourinho’s intense irritation, United’s conclusion was that in most cases he had targeted defenders who were no better than those they already had and who, in today’s inflated market, could conceivably have cost upwards of £70m without vastly improving the team."
That included the likes of Maguire and Alderwereld. Y'all need to get your head out of your collective arses with your 'mourinho is to blame alone' complex and stop boring us with dumb shit like 'but he bought Bailly and Lindeloff", when its beyond obvious to anyone serious its NOT them he desires to replace....
Of course you bloody would! In your book everything wrong at United can only be 'down to Mourinho" Which is just to fecking stupid if you actually play attention to what happens with our relationship recruitment...
It took Klopp how long to replace the likes of Mignolet and Lovren as first choice at Pool? Even Pep it took him till Laporte last January to find the type of CB he wanted to build his defense aroun? It took him two seasons to replace a goal keeper. But suddenly Mourinho 'didn't do his home work' for taking this long to ask for them to be replaced. Worse he is some how to blame for them still being at the club yet he asked for new CBS and defenders in the summer?
some of y'all just don't get how stupid you sound with this anti mourinho bias of yours.
I am sorry you are wrong there. He is our very own Frank SpencerHe's our very own Frank Sinclair.
Thought it was this guy ?I am sorry you are wrong there. He is our very own Frank Spencer
If we are all agreed that he is done here, then, looking back, was he (a) ruined by injuries or (b) physically precocious as a teenager and never actually that talented?
As they say,follow the m̶o̶n̶e̶y̶ Moyes.Haha. All leads to the same a comedy goon!! Good banter
He's not unlucky. Just basic stuff, some of them. Look at the one sginsag Spurs? That's a professional.
I never mentioned Tuanzebe or Blind, and I never discussed them with the poster you quoted. You responded to my post, where I lay the blame on Mourinho playing Jones. And you responded by saying "none of them are good enough"
You're confused it seems... @haram
Phil Jones is a very good player on his day. Hopefully can avoid too many injuries and pick up world class form which he can find.
Needs to get the feck out. He's either injured or trash 80% of the time.
Magnificent finish though, better than Lukaku surely.
We should play him up front. Point at the opposition goal and say "Phil, defend that".
We should play him up front. Point at the opposition goal and say "Phil, defend that".
And your next point will be waters wet or something as stimulating?
Yes he's not good enough to be a nailed on starter at United, but he's a decent squad option and gives his all. People just doing the boring usual stuff and going on and on about an error. It's very tedious.
Which post?You directly replied to the post .
This was your first response to me in this thread. Nowhere did I mention Blind or Tuanzebe anywhere in this thread. You quite clearly said none of our defenders are good enough then contradicted yourself in the following post when it dawned on you that Mourihho had signed two of them which I clearly pointed out to you. What on earth has another posters opinion on Tuanzebe got to do with me?None of them are good enough. Jose is the one who asked for a CB. Unbelievable how everything will be used against Jose.
You say Tuanzebe and Lindelof are not good enough but in the Tuanzebe thread you're saying, you rate both players. It doesn't cost anything to be honest. Your blind love for Mourinho exposed your lies..I said none of Jones, Tuanzebe and Blind are good enough. I am saying that Jose tried to sign a top CB and it didn't happen. Jones has had his chances, Lindelof and Bailly at least deserve time. This isn't even about Jose. Any manager that was going to come in before, or comes in after Jose would have to rebuild this squad. I am happy that we have Lindelof, Bailly and Tuanzebe as younger CB's. That does not change the fact that we still need a top CB.
If Lindelof and Bailly were not meant as a partnership what good is it banging on about spending 60 million on the pair of them? Laporte and Stones are meant to be a partnership and beyond that they cost 50million+ each. Do Lindelof and Bailly not deserve to play in a proper backline? Do we not come out with excuses for every other player claiming the system or whatever does not suit them? Because Bailly and Lindelof were signed by Jose you want to just claim they're shite? They have talent but they need help, doesn't matter who the manager is. It isn't even about Mourinho.
He's one of the worst players at the club. Huge fan of him when he first came through but he's just got steadily worse, year after year.
It's actually embarrassing that he's still here given the chances he's had
This statement goes for a lot of the players in the squad...should of been ruthless with the bunch of them years ago.
If we are all agreed that he is done here, then, looking back, was he (a) ruined by injuries or (b) physically precocious as a teenager and never actually that talented?
You say Tuanzebe and Lindelof are not good enough but in the Tuanzebe thread you're saying, you rate both players. It doesn't cost anything to be honest. Your blind love for Mourinho exposed your lies..
There's a big difference in saying a player isn't good enough and a player isn't good enough YET.He isn’t good enough YET. Yes I do rate both as talents but they are not top CB’s.
He's not unlucky. Just basic stuff, some of them. Look at the one against Spurs? That's a professional.
Isn't that pretty much implied already because of the age of the players? Both players aren't good enough but it is possible to still rate their talents, just not as current top players.There's a big difference in saying a player isn't good enough and a player isn't good enough YET.
There's a big difference in saying a player isn't good enough and a player isn't good enough YET.
This was your first response to me in this thread. Nowhere did I mention Blind or Tuanzebe anywhere in this thread. You quite clearly said none of our defenders are good enough then contradicted yourself in the following post when it dawned on you that Mourihho had signed two of them which I clearly pointed out to you. What on earth has another posters opinion on Tuanzebe got to do with me?
Your blind love for Mourinho is hilarious..