Distracted Steward
Full Member
A man with a great future behind him. Had the tools and the opportunity. I defended him longer than others—probably too long—but it’s been a while since he justified any sort of hope. Deadwood.
And Evans and Blind. Whether or not they were good enough to start for us, Jones should've been the first of the three to go.How we got rid of the da silva twins, chicharito and nani before Jones is bewildering
We as a fanbase tend to criticize our better players more harshly because more is expected of them. It's a disease.How we got rid of the da silva twins, chicharito and nani before Jones is bewildering
It's alright. He'll be injured soon and then when he comes back he'll have his customary couple of good games and we'll all be told what a great defender he is.
What a bunch of facts
There's absolutely no point in an injury prone backup option.
Feel free to point out a year in the last 5 where he's managed to actually stay fit all season and hasn't been injured multiple times mate.
He isn't good enough to be 1st choice, and his atrocious injury and illness record makes him unreliable and not even good enough as a 3rd-4th choice option. Even during the rare times he is fit he's nothing special, certainly nothing we couldn't replace with any decent centreback in the PL.
I think he gave away the ball 3 times for no reason. Two times in the first half and one time in the second.
Spot on. A lot of posters here seem to have selective amnesia when it comes to Jones.
He fecks up time and time again, then strings together a couple of decent games at home to teams that don't pose any kind of attacking threat, and the deluded "he's great when fit!" souls come out the woodwork.
Never play this clown again. He's massively injury prone and crap when he's fit - this is not a Ledley King situation where he's worth persisting with because he's excellent when healthy. The fact he's been at the club for EIGHT years blows my mind.
Today he made 5 tackles, 1 interception and 3 clearances. He was fouled more times than he fouled (2-1) and his pass completion rate was almost 90%. But lets concentrate on the 3 bad passes he made that didn't amount to any threat from Huddlesfield and then pretend that we aren't scapegoating him...SMH
https://www.whoscored.com/Players/81726/MatchStatistics/Phil-Jones
What in the f*ck does his injury record have to do with him being scapegoated during games or anything else that I've stated in my original post!?!?!?
Mate I am one of Jones bigger supporters generally. He had a poor game, but yes he was not why we didn't win. Only scoring 1 goal against a poor Huddersfield team was the big problem and our attack would not have been better without Jones. One of those passes did result in a very good chance for Huddersfield too.
Turning on Shaw, Jones and Shaw today would miss the bigger problem. It is our attack that struggle even against the worst team in the league and have 2 goals in the last 5 games.
That goal today means our defense has conceded 52 goals this year.Mate I am one of Jones bigger supporters generally. He had a poor game, but yes he was not why we didn't win. Only scoring 1 goal against a poor Huddersfield team was the big problem and our attack would not have been better without Jones. One of those passes did result in a very good chance for Huddersfield too.
Turning on Shaw, Jones and Shaw today would miss the bigger problem. It is our attack that struggle even against the worst team in the league and have 2 goals in the last 5 games.
It's a virus that spreads and infects all the new players. Then they get away from here examples of Zaha and Blind etc and become the most important players on their team.We as a fanbase tend to criticize our better players more harshly because more is expected of them. It's a disease.
So you watched the game today, and think that our defense is the main problem?That goal today means our defense has conceded 52 goals this year.
Our attack is poor. But our defense is even worse.
So you watched the game today, and
think that our defense is the main problem?
Yes it bothers me. But with the score of 1-1 against the worst team in the League, when they have nothing to play for while we have, you can tell where our problem lies.We ended the game with Young and Jones at CB does that not bother you?
Spot on. A lot of posters here seem to have selective amnesia when it comes to Jones.
He fecks up time and time again, then strings together a couple of decent games at home to teams that don't pose any kind of attacking threat, and the deluded "he's great when fit!" souls come out the woodwork.
Never play this clown again. He's massively injury prone and crap when he's fit - this is not a Ledley King situation where he's worth persisting with because he's excellent when healthy. The fact he's been at the club for EIGHT years blows my mind.
Yes it bothers me. But with the score of 1-1 against the worst team in the League, when they have nothing to play for while we have, you can tell where our problem lies.
He's really lucky that Rojo and Bailly are worse or he'd have been gone this summer.
Its the English quotaYou sure about that? I think the inept board would still sign him because of how long he's been here. His poor fitness record and limited contributions appearance wise didn't seem to deter them. Its not just the board, Jones is popular among the coaches and Fergie always had a soft spot for him, he's here for sentimental reasons IMO.
Its the English quota
Its the English quota
He's really lucky that Rojo and Bailly are worse or he'd have been gone this summer.
Our attack being so toothless plays it's part in how many goals we concede. Opposition teams are happy to throw significant numbers forward because they have absolutely no fear of our attack hurting them. They also win the ball back easily so get more opportunities (which makes them more confident).That goal today means our defense has conceded 52 goals this year.
Our attack is poor. But our defense is even worse.