Jericholyte2
Full Member
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2004
- Messages
- 3,971
The problem is that you feel de Ligt is an example of that bad wage management. I don't think that's true. Players that are not a hot commodity are the problem with United.
How many matches did Darmian take part of? Can we not fill his minimal role with O'Connor or Laird? How about Valencia? Why did Lingard get the wages he's on? Was he a threat to leave? No. Anybody that would want him could not offer him the wages he got at United and they were all a step down. Why did Jones get another contract when Tuanzebe could have filled his squad role, provided we do sign a CB?
That is where the waste occurs. De Ligt is not an example of this. He is a necessary asset for where United are currently. We need him to transform the outlook of the club so that we can keep a player like Pogba and attract other high end talent because our reputation is currently a sinking ship. We need people to buy into our rebuild project.
100% agree with this. The wage structure should be based on player value, quality and contribution to the squad. If De Ligt were to come in, he’d be automatic first choice and arguably the best CB in the club, so why shouldn’t he be paid appropriately for that?
Similarly, the Darmians, Joneses, etc of the squad should be replaced by academy products.