Posh Red
Full Member
I don’t know. Let me just check his contract.For how many games?
What’s the minimum number?
I don’t know. Let me just check his contract.For how many games?
I don’t even think Rashford is a ‘great’ player, but who do these conspiracy theorists believe the managers were having to start him over? Were they desperate to put one of our other players in, who also never score any goals?This may well be the most ridiculous post ever posted on Redcafe.
Do you seriously believe managers would potentially ruin their reputation by playing a player they don't want too? Or quite frankly would even take a job whereby a player has been forced upon you taking away your decision making?
Managers play Rashford because he is actually a decent player who, despite what majority of fans think, offers the team a lot.
I don’t know. Let me just check his contract.
What’s the minimum number?
Whether I think that or not isn’t relevant. I would never see a player getting picked when I disagreed and think ‘this must be contractual’.You think it makes perfect sense to keep playing a player who jogs on the pitch for most of the time while I don't. Let's agree to disagree
So we’ve established that Rashford has minimum appearances in his contract.
Next: how many high 5’s a game does Dalot have in his contract?
Bruno has a minimum trivela contract.So we’ve established that Rashford has minimum appearances in his contract.
Next: how many high 5’s a game does Dalot have in his contract?
Shaw has a maximum game contract.Bruno has a minimum travella contract.
Also, Fred used to have a ‘take five long shots per game, and none of them can be on target’ clause.
It’s the only reasonable explanation.Shaw has a maximum game contract.
I think it's a myth.And they'll never be because it would make all parties involved look stupid. However the proof is in the pudding mate and there's nothing that remotely justify why Rashford keeps being at the center of every manager's plan. The guy has been shit for months now. He produces very little offensively and nothing in terms of work rate. So either all our managers are idiots or else there's something more to it.
Football is probably the worst business to invest in. It basically consist of spending tens of millions on a group of people who then has to work together and outperform the rest. Anyone working in a business would tell you that people are the most volatile of assets. There's a million reasons why things can go wrong with people both individually and in terms of a team. Some of them can't even be explained. Take Baggio for example. He was an amazing talent and a great character. Yet he always struggled at a top club were he wasn't the center of attention. The irony is that Baggio is not even an extrovert. These days he lives in a farm somewhere as much away from football as humanely possible. But on the pitch he needed to feel constantly loved by everyoneWhether I think that or not isn’t relevant. I would never see a player getting picked when I disagreed and think ‘this must be contractual’.
Also, can you show me where I said he should be picked?
There's not a minimum appearance clause, to think there is one is slightly unhinged and misguided.If there's a minimum appearance clause inserted in his contract then they hardly have a choice.
And what exactly has Rashford offered in the past few months?
For the record I don't think Rashy is anywhere as shit as some portray him to be but he certainly doesn't deserve the gameplay he keeps getting. At this point he's getting on the nerves of our legends as well which does say something considering that he's a homegrown talent
I think it's a myth.
Coaches have simply played Rashford because they believe there's no one better available. That's a club failing.
He is still our top goalscorer in the league this season....faint praise admittedly but he is scoring goals more than any other striker so far...United does lack quality upfront and its an issue that has been developing for more then a decade. I remembering arguing in here at our decline in quality as people like Ronaldo, Scholes and Giggs were slowly being replaced by the likes of Young Fellaini and Valencia.
However every player we had put a shift in irrespective of how talented they were irrespective if he's Giggs, Scholes, Keane, Park, Fellaini or McT. These days Rashford doesn't even do that. Seriously most of the time it feels like we're playing with 10 men with him around.
Most managers think that they can perform wonders anywhere. That's the stubborn ultra competitive nature managers has embedded in them which allow them to survive and thrive in football. They also aware that if things go wrong they'll end up compensated either way. Mourinho is said to have earned £82m in severance payments aloneThere's not a minimum appearance clause, to think there is one is slightly unhinged and misguided.
People thought this with Rooney and it turned out to be false, very much the same with Rashford.
Ask yourself why a manager would put up with having a player forced upon them which could be at the detriment to their reputation ?
He's played far more games than any other striker.He is still our top goalscorer in the league this season....faint praise admittedly but he is scoring goals more than any other striker so far...
Yep 2 goals against mighty Barnsley and Everton (one of whom was a clear own goal from Jarrad) and 1 goal against Ipswich and Southampton.He is still our top goalscorer in the league this season....faint praise admittedly but he is scoring goals more than any other striker so far...
Didn't realise Barnsley were in the premier League?! He has four in the league, more than anyone else, and is only one behind Garnacho overall.Yep 2 goals against mighty Barnsley and Everton (one of whom was a clear own goal from Jarrad) and 1 goal against Ipswich and Southampton.
For the record I am not saying that its 100% the case. There might be something I am missing. All I am saying (and its evident in the first post were I said it) is that I sometimes wonder if there's a minimum appearance clause inserted in his contract as I genuinely can't understand why he keeps getting so many chances.
The Everton one was nestling in the bottom corner.Yep 2 goals against mighty Barnsley and Everton (one of whom was a clear own goal from Jarrad) and 1 goal against Ipswich and Southampton.
For the record I am not saying that its 100% the case. There might be something I am missing. All I am saying (and its evident in the first post were I said it) is that I sometimes wonder if there's a minimum appearance clause inserted in his contract as I genuinely can't understand why he keeps getting so many chances.
Yep 2 goals against mighty Barnsley and Everton (one of whom was a clear own goal from Jarrad) and 1 goal against Ipswich and Southampton.
For the record I am not saying that its 100% the case. There might be something I am missing. All I am saying (and its evident in the first post were I said it) is that I sometimes wonder if there's a minimum appearance clause inserted in his contract as I genuinely can't understand why he keeps getting so many chances.
They obviously wouldn’t. It’s just fan fiction. It’s hard to believe some people believe things like this.There's not a minimum appearance clause, to think there is one is slightly unhinged and misguided.
People thought this with Rooney and it turned out to be false, very much the same with Rashford.
Ask yourself why a manager would put up with having a player forced upon them which could be at the detriment to their reputation ?
If you paid a bit more attention to the performances of the alternative players in his position I’m sure the penny would drop.
Didn't realise Barnsley were in the premier League?! He has four in the league, more than anyone else, and is only one behind Garnacho overall.
He keeps getting the chances because he is actually a decent player. There's no defence to his shocking cameo the other day, but his performances have not been nearly as bad as some on here would have you believe.
I thought Ten Hag would do this. Hope Amorin is able to follow through.I think the days where players think they can put in little effort and still play most weeks are coming to an end.
This manager will not tolerate such things.
Same, I thought TH dealt with the early things so well, with Ronaldo and Maguire captaincy and cases, but then after the Caraboa cup win, it seemed everything kinda fell apart (but we still finished top 4). Then everything kinda sucked except one cup run.I thought Ten Hag would do this. Hope Amorin is able to follow through.
Dude. There’s a world of difference between thinking Rashford has been crap for ages and thinking it’s acceptable to remind him of this by tweeting at him on a condolences tweet.
The former is fine. I hold that exact opinion! The latter is, obviously, despicable. And calling that behaviour out isn’t even close to embarrassing.
I think he should be binned as much as anyone.
But in all seriousness.
He just posted an RIP message to a lady that worked at Utd for 50+ years. But, you think it's ok to post shit comments at him about his football under that.
Would you go to the funeral and shout abuse at him there?
Sadly he’s also built enough of a brand to stay here a long time yet. The club is far too sentimental in that regard. Rashford should be a must sell / move on this summer.He’s built enough of a brand that I’m hoping the Saudis or Americans would be willing to cough up 50m for him.
Not a terrible player but the window to cash out is almost entirely closed.
Lots of things at the club need a reset and imo none more urgently than the dressing room. We can talk about transfers and tactics till we're blue in the face, but if we want to look like a cohesive unit on the pitch we have to be ruthless as you said. Had Arsenal not taken that approach Arteta might be back to bringing Pep his morning cup of coffee.We did give Bruno a salary increase + a contract extension in the summer simply because he came out with the Saudi 'offer' nonsense. In my opinion we should be more lethal and conservative when dealing with contracts. If there was really a Saudi offer and Bruno was interested in it then we should have accepted it. This rebuild will take years and Bruno will probably not be part of it. Then there was the ETH's contract extension mess which was based on 1 good game.
It did? How? Circumstantial evidence is very much that there was a contractual clause until he became club top scorer. He got dropped rather quickly after that by Mourinho.There's not a minimum appearance clause, to think there is one is slightly unhinged and misguided.
People thought this with Rooney and it turned out to be false, very much the same with Rashford.
Ask yourself why a manager would put up with having a player forced upon them which could be at the detriment to their reputation ?
By whom and how?He is protected inside the club and he is on a contract that makes him unsaleable. Going nowhere. Just get used to it. Too bad for this coach, though.
His Cameo wasn't shocking. It was his normal. Show me anyone that was shocked by that.Didn't realise Barnsley were in the premier League?! He has four in the league, more than anyone else, and is only one behind Garnacho overall.
He keeps getting the chances because he is actually a decent player. There's no defence to his shocking cameo the other day, but his performances have not been nearly as bad as some on here would have you believe.
It did? How? Circumstantial evidence is very much that there was a contractual clause until he became club top scorer. He got dropped rather quickly after that by Mourinho.