Footyislife
But actually, it's not.
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2015
- Messages
- 1,074
You're so wrong. The irony is we're actually trying to be the 12th man. Playing Rashford at LW is probably worse than playing 10 v 11 cause he just doesn't press. This is no different than CR7 2.0 situation or the countless players SAF got rid of when they refused to play hard/within role for the team.My thing is, couldn't care less if we're rinsing other teams players.... They're all cnuts. But some of you lot seem to enjoy rinsing ours and it doesn't make sense to me unless it's a player that's turned out to be a wrong un.
We are supposed to be the 12th man but we're trying to be the 12th man for the oppo, the match day thread is a madness...
I get it I'm getting old football is emotion blah blah... Just feels shit and the end result with players looking a shambles and shook is pretty predictable and detrimental.
Anyway continue....
Our issue is we have a media that's so biased against us that it's protecting a player that's like cancer to our team. Ralf and Jose have tried to get rid of Rashford but as per my previous comments we've made some foolish decisions prioritizing commercial importance over football results (which is silly cause long term finance is tied to football results). Rashford is far worse of a player than the likes of CR7, Beckham, Ince, Rudd who we've let go. It's scary but letting go of players who are past their best allows you to develop younger stars. As we saw last couple game's Garnacho, Diallo are far better than Rashford and we need to bring another 1-2 youngsters in. Selling/pushing Rashford out would accelerate that process.
To quote a talented artist "Thank You, Next!" (RASHFORD)