Walters_19_MuFc
Full Member
I meant young fans who grow up and decide to support someone in the 'real' league.
Ahh, I see. My bad.
I meant young fans who grow up and decide to support someone in the 'real' league.
Do Barcelona have a cheese room....Disagree. This is based on how big they are. If anything, City is the odd man out of all those clubs. City and Spurs.
For sure. I'd be straight to Norwich myself. Suspect many of us who have been brought up to support United but actually have a decent local team would do similar. Albeit, it'd never be quite the same.The remaining clubs may well get extra/new fans too.
This is what made me doubt the existence of some paid shills on here. How do you support this club and its history and think this is OK?!??!?
That wasn't a friendly.Guess when we won the European World Cup in Japan that was a friendly as well. Hope you didn't get too excited, you know, friendly and all that.
Yup.
With no need for European qualification if we have a bad first 10 games in the league then our domestic season is essentially over in September...leaving you with 28 dead rubbers because every spot from 2nd - 17th means essentially the same, outside of varying prize money for the owners.
Same goes for all the Super League clubs.
Hm, I may be disliked for my opinions on here but I definitely support this club (in my own way). Who the hell are you?Stop this WUM.
European Union will block this super league for sure, meanwhile
This is probably the right time for Celtic and Rangers to join the Prem
There were some statements in tweets upthread, can't find them right now. Obviously things are moving quite quickly but this is in line with what has been said.
I may be wrong but I've seen it mentioned.
Where was this?
If Bayern join it'll be the end of the UCL. They're the only team withholding the new Super League from claiming to be the best.
Bayern, Ajax, Dortmund make much more sense as inclusions than Arsenal, Tottenham, Atletico.
Seriously why was Arsenal even invited? Because they have rich owners too?
The Americanization of European football has started.
Not us, the sport. And that is my point.
I couldn't find any sources and I need to sleep, so I agree with you. This forum is usually great with vetting tweets, so I assumed most of the stuff was legit but I guess we've had some duds.There was a lot of nonsense tweets being posted earlier. I don't think anything of the sort has been confirmed.
All I can find is that they 'could' ban them from all competitions.
We'll be playing at least 10 games against English opposition, which makes the competition a bit shit.
Because globally they are one of the top 10/15 clubs in the world and have a massive fanbase in different continents. This is absolutely nothing to do with the current quality of the team, it's to do with who will watch the league - people in Asia and America will lap this up - especially younger fans. Teams like Arsenal and Spurs will then go on to make huge signings with the money involved in this and that will eventually even out the talent in the ESL. I think it's an absolute disaster by the way , not defending it at all just saying the reasoning behind why they have gone with some of the teams.
Spare a thought for Leicester or West Ham
You've alluded to it yourself, the league won't be able to offer enough to make it worth it. And back then, the clubs didn't have another big shinyTaking the top four argument in isolation, it's only been a thing for about 15 years, before that it was top 3 and before that just the winner. The PL can rectify this by adding a financial incentive (on top of the existing one which will be tricky if the numbers are true)
Sky sports loved talking about the big four, then the top 6. It's been invented and reinvented by sky for years.
The harder part is where the top 3 just nope out of the CL, but then that's more of a problem for the CL than the PL.
This is what made me doubt the existence of some paid shills on here. How do you support this club and its history and think this is OK?!??!?
I think the problem here is that winning the domestic league for these clubs will genuinely become unimportant. Regardless of whether you start well or not winning the Super League will be more important, in terms of prestige and in terms of money.I'd expect the people actual playing feel differently if I'm honest. Mason would still want to winning games, scoring goals and playing at a level that sees him revered by fans.
Why do you think anyone supports anyone that isn't a big 6 club? Do you not think players kfr other clubs out a shift in even though they know full well they won't win anything at all. Do Birmingham City fans love their club because there's a chance they will win a Premier league? And the players, have they never played well despite not having a league title as a possibility? Or qualifying for Europe even?
This actually seems pretty disrespectful to players. I've seen people just assume they don't give a shit outside of a league win. In reality that's fans projecting their own feelings onto other people.
I fully expect that people who go to the ground will continue to do so. Just like Arsenal fans would still be going now if stadiums we allowed to be full, despite their absolute shambolic season, yethey would still turn up and then moan on aftv about the situation. Their players are still trying to win games, so do most other players of other clubs who have no hope of even qualifying for the Europa.
Greenwood will be absolutely buzzing tonight and it won't be because of much more than he played a match of football, played well and scored. He won't only be happy because top 4 is getting more likely or we've now got a shout at catching City.
Who cares how good they were 15+ years ago. People dont watch the name or the history. They watch the team and Arsenal's current team isn't very good. You know they could solve that problem with some kind of qualification, like earning more points than their peers over a season. That way the elite european competition has the elite teams in it. Or i guess we could just assume Arsenal will be one of the 15 best teams in europe for the rest of existence becasue they're called arsenalIt's obviously not about footballing ability. Arsenal are a bigger team than the ones you mention.
Disagree. This is based on how big they are. If anything, City is the odd man out of all those clubs. City and Spurs.
They can't do that and in all honesty, them feeling they have the ability to punish players for their club may be part of the problem. I actually want to see how this looks like. I don't like the idea of permanent members, but I suspect this is them simply cutting out UEFA, eventually more clubs will join if its successful and it will replace the champions league.
What the hell are you on about?Will it? Life goes on outside of what the elite clubs do just fine currently. There may be adjustments and what have you but there are still competitions to try and qualify for and general all round progress to be aimed for, as is now for so many clubs.
How exactly does this hurt Sheffield United? What if this proposal would mean that if it were active last season, that they would have made the Champions League. Maybe a less prestigious tournament than it was previously but still saw an increase in revenue etc. What if it ended up meaning they were able to reinvest and survive relegation?
Does this not mean that the other European competitions will see new teams? Why does this shut down football from top to bottom of it isn't already?
Hm, I may be disliked for my opinions on here but I definitely support this club (in my own way). Who the hell are you?
They can't do that and in all honesty, them feeling they have the ability to punish players for their club may be part of the problem. I actually want to see how this looks like. I don't like the idea of permanent members, but I suspect this is them simply cutting out UEFA, eventually more clubs will join if its successful and it will replace the champions league.
To be fair, the fake Diesel didn't do to bad for himself.This could be like when Kevin Hall and Scott Nash left WWE. We could be replaced in the Champions League by another Manchester United but its actually Birmingham City.
They will have already considered the various governments actions.
You don't know that. The twelve clubs may just think the £400 million per year is worth the sanctions. Never underestimate the human capacity for greed.Not a single team or player will be banned. This is all posturing. They wouldn't have taken the step if there was any danger of this.
In the scenario that the Super League sides are allowed to remain within their domestic leagues, what happens if one gets relegated?