PSG would prop up any fees.
European Super League
- Thread starter esmufc07
- Start date
PSG would prop up any fees.
The Premier League is at the top of a pyramid which means clubs can get relegated and promoted. Teams like Leicester can come from the Championship, establish themselves and then win the league. The super league is a closed club where none of that is ever possible. It's wretched.
I keep seeing this but UEFA isn't taking a profit or dividends. It redistributes almost all it takes in apart from the wages to its directors and staff costs.
Comparing them with the greedy owners is just bizarre.
im ashamed of Man Utd if they actually go through with this idea of they do im certainly not attending any games (when we are allowed) and not buying any shirts glazers all about money football will be ruined #unitedagainstEUROPIANSUPERLEAGUE!
Well this is more serious and ready to implement than I thought.
Good grief. As if they couldn't get more tone deaf and incapable of reading the crowd.
And explained in the first response.
Ceferin has a job, and in his position, shutting up right now when the spotlight is on him, does more damage to him. He is expected by both sides to talk, and talk big even if it's crazy talk. It's for the ESL side's benefits that no harm is done to him, and better yet to get him join the gang once his term expires. The more dramatic he is right now, the more impact he can bring if he indeed joins ESL.
The ENTIRE point of it is that the teams forming it will always be in it. SO they can't lose out, ever.
SO why do you somehow think those teams, who make the rules, will vote to potentially relegate themselves out of it?
Toilet Bowl.
Fecking twats.
I just watched that entire video and it makes them the opposite of hypocrites. As the video explains, Bayern would benefit from a super league more than nearly anyone. Maybe the most. Simply due to how much more money they would make from broadcasting compared to other teams from other leagues.
Bruno Fernandes and Marcus Rashford, those 2 are able to do that kind of thing.
These motherfeckers will sell their own mother to get another £.
Organising something like this is more than an Instagram post. Rashford has shown a desire to use his platform for the betterment of society, but this is a bit different.
What does that even mean?
Independent bodies that sold their soul for a pot of Qatari gold. Do me a favour with the hypocrisy lecture.
Imagine United doing a NWO style entrance to Jimi Hendrix's voodoo child
Last edited:
It's crazy that some people just completely overlook this fundamental aspect.
We'll see.
This season is an easy one as it's almost over and there isn't much interest left in the remaining clubs. Let's see how the CL fares next year without any of the big teams in it. He'll soon backtrack, probably announcing some big statement fine that was pre-agreed by the clubs beforehand.
Of course the island will have a tax rate of 0.001%.
So, what’s Sergio Canales up to these days?
Mohamd Bouhafsi: "Despite requests from several clubs, Al-Khelaifi has refused to take over the presidency of the ECA. He wanted to help rebuild football by remaining a member of the ECA board"
Despite requests from several European clubs, Nasser Al Khelaifi has refused to take over the presidency of the ECA (association of big clubs). He explained that he wanted to help rebuild football by remaining a member of the ECA board and especially president of PSG.
Presume they mean Sir Matt taking United into Europe despite the league trying to stop us. How dare they think that.
This is wrong on every level, full stop.
I don’t see how this desecration can be solved from within football associations. It’s going to take the collection action of the national governments to prohibit this by law. And I’m quite sure that if litigation against the legality of such laws (in the UK, Italy, etc,) is brought that the courts would hold in favor of the governments.
I don’t see how this desecration can be solved from within football associations. It’s going to take the collection action of the national governments to prohibit this by law. And I’m quite sure that if litigation against the legality of such laws (in the UK, Italy, etc,) is brought that the courts would hold in favor of the governments.
I didn't suggest that he should shut up, you seemingly didn't read nor care about the posts you responded too. I said that he can't target the owners specifically, not that he should shut up.
Sorry, and your point is what exactly?
What I would say is, from what I've seen, the people for this seem to be ones who were willing to welcome the Saudi royal family with open arms.
Desperate, dark times for English football. The Glazers have fecking ruined our football club and are destroying any heritage. They can shove their NFL franchise concept up their asses
I might be wrong but have the clubs not signed contracts to join the 'super' league?
If so that would be grounds that they have breached the rules of the game
That’s what I was just thinking.
No doubt they were anticipating the negative response. They were anticipating the lawsuits, the threats, the point deductions, the bans, the PR disaster. Everything.
But yesterday, it felt like an assault on football that. And everyone’s reacting like a wounded animal. You’ve got Boris Johnson and Macron gettig involved. Ceferin having a meltdown, getting personal with the”traitors”. It really has it all.
And Ceferin being Agnelli’s daughter godfather. You couldn’t make this up.
I love the response, though. Fascinating to see how this pans out.
Absolute rubbish. They are going after the international 'fans' with this.
Busby and United were very unpopular with the Football League for wanting to enter European competitions. Some would argue the Munich Air Disaster was inadvertently caused by the Football League’s hard stance is being unwilling to flex the schedule, which meant United travelling by air in tight windows to fulfil domestic and European fixtures.
I never said this isn't worse than anything we have seen, but does that mean what we have seen in the last 20 years is acceptable?
Yes I am aware of it being in the news, but the average football fan was not going to do anything about it and most people were happy to accept it and continue watching football like nothing happened.
People moaning about money in the game means diddly squat as these same people still watched football regardless. I mentioned FIFA and UEFA as allowing football to get to this point in the first place is partly to do with them, and they have always been about money first and foremost but football fans were happy to turn a blind eye and continue watching regardless.
The players will be up in arms if they’re banned from the Euros.
Can’t see Pep et al taking it lying down if City get denied their first crack at a CL title. Tuchel will be mighty pissed off too.
Cretins.
Damn, we need some threadmarks in here.
It means Woodward is a Brave Hero for doing this.