European Super League

Do you want the ESL to happen?


  • Total voters
    1,921
  • Poll closed .
Oh, excellent stuff. We can all rest easy now, our fears of it being a tedious, money-driven enterprise with no element of fairness and competition have been quelled by @TrustInJanuzaj with that statement.
As I've said there are 1000 reasons why this shouldn't happen, but anyone using 'boring' as a reason is simply wrong. These would be the best players and clubs competing against each other every week. That never will be boring I'm sorry if people cant see that through the rightful outrage.
 
[
you mean the CL or the SL?

i don't really see this argument that no one will care about winning the domestic leagues anymore. teams still try and win the league right now, despite the CL. why would it change? of course everyone is going to still want to win the league.



see above. also, people take the piss about competing for a top 4 position, and now it's being praised as making things more interesting? and the top 6 is a cash cow for the PL, they will lose money, sponsorship, tv rights, everything if they leave. the big 6 know this. they have the power.

i'm not even saying the SL is a good idea necessarily, but these arguments i don't think stand.
Teams will still want to win the prem yes, but if they’re also in the super league that will obviously take priority so players will be rested/youth played in the prem, and with the super league teams having no real objective to win the prem or finish high as it wouldn’t lead to qualification of anything anyway. So when these 6 finish in random places in the top ten, possibly relegation places the champions league and Europa league places will be taken up by a mish mash of positions not the top teams of the league. It’ll be a mess.

The destroying of national leagues is just one issue I have with it, there’s many more where they haven’t cared one bit about match going fans that have made football what it is and are clearly going global tv rights route.
 
So? Again, not his fault PSG offered him that much money. You're telling me, if you could basically double your wage (weekly), you wouldn't take it? People want money. Players aren't the issue here, the owners are.
Why is the club wanting more money an issue then? You could apply the exact same logic.
 
I disagree with this as a principle, but watching the best players playing against each other every week should be the dream for every football fan. The group stages are boring because 50% of the teams in the competition are dross. I guarantee that playing Madrid will never get boring, nor will Ronaldo Vs Messi etc. It would be the highest level of football ever showcased.

What if, I dunno, money is better distributed so that there are no dross teams...????

Oh right, too crazy sure
 
So? Again, not his fault PSG offered him that much money. You're telling me, if you could basically double your wage (weekly), you wouldn't take it? People want money.

People want money, yet here you are complaining over the super league?

I'm not saying that he's personally the one who has skewered the system. But if you take that paycheck then you should know that there will be ramifications at some point on a global level at some point.

Nothing comes for free.
 
Twitter thread on the new owners of AC Milan
Apologies if this thread has been posted before, but I thought it needed to be shared... feck me. The game is beyond gone.

 
I'm calling out the insane amount of hypocrisy on display.

The only thing missing is Saudi Arabia taking a humanitarian stand against the World Cup in Qatar

Ok. You call out the only people with influence who can do anything whatsoever about this every time they comment. That will teach them.
 
Isnt it because German clubs are part owned by fans, and they knew their fans would never entertain this
Yes, but so are Real, Barsa and Atlético. I wonder if their rules and regulations allow them to make this move without consulting their members?
 
The bucs were pretty much shit for the last 15 years until Brady showed up, his contract wasn’t even that much that man just wants to win and he brings players who want to win as well and that will fit Cap space because they know they have a chance of winning.
And Glazers didnt have to do that if they were comfortable with getting pumped every year?
I cant see why lessening a machine like the Utd brand helps them in any way. Say we do turn to shit, the EPL money and sponsors we lose makes any super league windfall shrink surely?
Imagine dominating a super league and the money that would bring.
 
We have known this FOR YEARS.

Have I woken up on a parallel Earth? Why are people so up in arms over this all of a sudden? Have we not been owned by the Glazers for years? Did we not know what they’re like?

Neville tweeting about socialism whilst working for Sky and never criticising the City owners. Herrera playing for PSG complaining about money ruining the game. People who openly campaigned for the Saudis to buy our club kicking off.

Have I gone utterly mad? Of course this is a shit decision but it’s the latest in a long list. If you wanted the Saudi’s to take over us, if you haven’t been up in arms about PSG or City ruining the game how on Earth is this the straw that broke the camels back?

Again, there's no nuance to this position at all. You can think that there's too much money in the game and too many rich owners with no connection to the clubs they own whilst at the same time be of the opinion that this is a step too far. Forming a breakaway league that you can't be relegated from goes against the very nature of professional football as a competition. It's understandable that (ex) professional players would think that way too.

The PL are now in an impossible situation that damages the integrity of their competition regardless of any recourse they take if this goes ahead. Likewise this has a knock on effect for all the leagues and clubs below who aspire to a seat at the table.
 
People want money, yet here you are complaining over the super league?

I'm not saying that he's personally the one who has skewered the system. But if you take that paycheck then you should know that there will be ramifications at some point on a global level at some point.

Nothing comes for free.

exactly.

You accept PSG you ultimately will accept a super league.

You accept Chelsea and City you will get a super league.
 
What about after a few games when it is apparent who the top 5 will be so all games between bottom 5 will be absolutely pointless. Especially if the founders are in the bottom 5 as they will still be in the competition again next year. no matter what
Status and competition would keep it competitive and entertaining within that group. Why do I care about finishing second instead of fourth this season? Because I hate our rivals and want to finish ahead. That would still ring true at any level. The increased quality would also prevent it from ever getting too boring.
 
Dejan Lovren: "Football will be on a brink of complete collapse. Nobody is thinking about the bigger picture, only the financial side"
 
It would be worse if he didn't say anything, though. It needs more players speaking out against it, but ideally from the clubs that are going to be joining.

Right, I just think in this instance, his voice isn't really worth a lot. PSG has been left out in the cold and is most likely fuming about this with all the money spent on Qatar 2022 and Champions League success.

I don't think Ander was influenced per se, but I'd value it more if it came from say Bruno Fernandes etc.
 
I would push back against the whole "this announcements shows that these clubs don't care about their supporters" narrative pushed by some pundits and fans.

While I think it shows that the management of these clubs doesn't care about the football pyramid as a whole or fans of other clubs. I don't agree that it shows they don't care about the fans of their own club.

As if you are a fan of one of these clubs, you will likely get to watch higher quality football on a regular basis. And due to the extra revenue, the clubs will likely get more star and big-name signings, something which you just have to read this forum to see is almost as important to fans as what happens on the pitch.

So while I think this league would likely be bad for the game as a whole I don't think it shows contempt from the owners of these clubs to their own fans.
 
Chris Purslow putting it really well:

The Villa chief executive Christian Purslow, formerly of Liverpool, has branded the Super League a “grotesque concept”. Speaking to BBC Radio Four, he said: “These proposals do away with sporting merit. It would enable a small number of clubs to be in this competition come what may and, for millions of people in football, that goes against everything the sport means and stands for. The idea is that the uncertainty that comes with sport, that makes it so compelling, that we all love, is actually damaging to the business model of these huge clubs. So the scheme is designed to take away that uncertainty, to give predictability to their businesses so that, if they’re badly managed or have a poor year, they’re still in the premier tournament. Does that sound like sport or football to you? To me it sounds a grotesque concept.”

The American sports franchise model at it's core. Run by the owners and with guaranteed incomes.
 
I disagree with this as a principle, but watching the best players playing against each other every week should be the dream for every football fan. The group stages are boring because 50% of the teams in the competition are dross. I guarantee that playing Madrid will never get boring, nor will Ronaldo Vs Messi etc. It would be the highest level of football ever showcased.

There's no local rivalry with Madrid, they're just another big team. It's special because it rarely happens. If it becomes something that happens every year, I just don't see how its that exciting? At first maybe, but the whole thing would get dry very quickly.
 
We have known this FOR YEARS.

Have I woken up on a parallel Earth? Why are people so up in arms over this all of a sudden? Have we not been owned by the Glazers for years? Did we not know what they’re like?

Neville tweeting about socialism whilst working for Sky and never criticising the City owners. Herrera playing for PSG complaining about money ruining the game. People who openly campaigned for the Saudis to buy our club kicking off.

Have I gone utterly mad? Of course this is a shit decision but it’s the latest in a long list. If you wanted the Saudi’s to take over us, if you haven’t been up in arms about PSG or City ruining the game how on Earth is this the straw that broke the camels back?

Well said indeed.
 
Inveitable once petrol clubs like City and PSG were allowed in and to flout rules without any punishment. The old guard were always going to react to the financial doping that artificially increased their costs and hit profits.
 
I think if teams rise to a certain level they will expand the league to include them. Maybe a play in tournament with rotating guest teams... who knows?

I get the outrage... I'm an American so it's much easier for me to watch it from an outsider's perspective and enjoy the idea of watching great players every week instead of sitting through the Brighton or Fulham games. But sometimes change can be invigorating. I just think the best players should always be in the same league. American college football wouldn't allow a playoff for years because of sponsor and university interest in all their various bowl games, and now those games are extremely popular though still very much a work in progress.

This is why, as an American, I recognize there is a hierarchy when it comes to fans.

I remember being attracted to European football because of the passion of the fanbases of each club, and how that fed into the actual sport on the pitch.

The sport would be nothing without them and their clubs from non-league all the way to the highest levels. To dismiss 99% of football as irrelevant, in favor of overseas cnuts who "just want to see the best go at it every week" is an insult. I can't understand why sports fan would be for this.



Genuinely feel a bit sick.


Same. The sport would be nothing without those local fans being dismissed so casually as "legacy fans" (like what the feck??).
 
Shameful, perhaps the darkest day in the history of the beautiful game. On SSN just now "One board member has said they would be prepared to leave the premiership over this if required, due to the riches on offer". This sum's it up, no consultation with the fans just to line up their pockets with vast sums of money. Because making £100/200 million + profits a year just isn't enough these day....:rolleyes:

Foreign owners, acting in foreign interests with no regard for local fans, the sacrifice, family traditions and origins of the game. Just destroys the pyramid of football and hurts all clubs/fans in the national league/lower levels.
 
The PL might have started similarly as a break away league but at least teams have something to fight for whether it’s avoiding relegation, qualifying for the EL or CL. There is no purpose to this ESL other than to make the rich owners richer under the guise of “exciting football between the big boys”.
 
Why is the club wanting more money an issue then? You could apply the exact same logic.
You're right you could, that's why this whole league has been formed... But this isn't even the original point, this stemmed from the fact that a few members are never satisfied, and aren't happy Herrara stepped up just because he plays for PSG...
 
There's no local rivalry with Madrid, they're just another big team. It's special because it rarely happens. If it becomes something that happens every year, I just don't see how its that exciting? At first maybe, but the whole thing would get dry very quickly.
I just don't think it would. If both teams had some of the best players in the world then the level of quality on display makes it interesting. All competitions start somewhere and rivalry would very quickly pick up. We have little history with Burnley and yet I hate them at the moment, the difference there is you don't even have the quality to fall back onto so it's just a hard watch.
 
We have known this FOR YEARS.

Have I woken up on a parallel Earth? Why are people so up in arms over this all of a sudden? Have we not been owned by the Glazers for years? Did we not know what they’re like?

Neville tweeting about socialism whilst working for Sky and never criticising the City owners. Herrera playing for PSG complaining about money ruining the game. People who openly campaigned for the Saudis to buy our club kicking off.

Have I gone utterly mad? Of course this is a shit decision but it’s the latest in a long list. If you wanted the Saudi’s to take over us, if you haven’t been up in arms about PSG or City ruining the game how on Earth is this the straw that broke the camels back?
This sums everything up. The thin end of the wedge happened years ago and no one dared to do anything about it because everyone was getting rich.
 
What if, I dunno, money is better distributed so that there are no dross teams...????

Oh right, too crazy sure
I agree, but that isn't going to happen. Just like we arent going to redistribute wealth in society. Capitalism is the issue, it just happened to filter into football increasingly.
 
Not atta boy at all.

He is playing for PSG. They are owned by a literal nation that destroys everything around them.


PSG are against this because it threatens their incredible advantage. Herrera caring about money in football is ridiculous.

You are a troll.

Massive credit to a current player, particularly one playing for a rich club like PSG.
 
Harsh to to be having a go at Herrera. Can't begrudge him for thinking of his own career and finances in joining PSG. It doesn't preclude him from having an opinion and being a "legacy fan" with us. Let's see if anyone at the clubs dare to speak out.
 
Also goes some way to explaining why we didn’t invest despite losing each CB to a season ending injury. The pricks knew this was coming, a guaranteed pot of money each year.