i was actually praising uruguay, but the population thing is overplayed
mexico is a footballing nation, has 140 million people but hasn't won jack
Sure, it's not just population or else China should win every World Cup. More important things take precedence like:
- Being a football nation to begin with
- Physical/racial and cultural factors (and no, it isn't racist, it's a fact different nations have different complexions, athleticism, etc. Broadly, of course).
- Character and temperament
But then take Argentina and Uruguay, all the factors above are pretty similar, almost identical. What sets us apart is they have 13x our population so are more likely to unearth freaks like Messi and for every Suárez we produce they are bound to produce 13!
Sure, ultimately only 11 players get on the teamsheet so having 13 Suárez' isn't particularly useful, but we are Suarez-less given one player being suspended while they have Messi, Aguero, Di Maria, Pastore... And when they need to freshen things up they can bring on Carlos Tévez while when we need a goal we bring on Hull City's Abel friggin' Hernández.
At a certain scale it isn't an issue. I don't think Brazil should be 5x better than Argentina or win 5x as much, 40M people is more than enough to get a really competitive squad from and being able to navigate injuries, suspensions, loss of form, key players aging...
You lost Rivaldo and Ronaldinho arrived, Goofy got fat but Kaká arrived, he turned to shit and Neymar arrived... In the last Copa we had Diego Forlán pulling the strings, now we are expecting Nicolás feckin' Lodeiro to orchestrate the transition.
Three million people, 1.5m males, about 200K in ripe age for an NT... that makes for a very fragile and delicate balance, so I can't complain when the lads go out there and put in a fine defensive performance. They just weren't lucky enough to get a goal.