Remember the geese
Full Member
He's a productive player no doubt. Just not especially consistent in his general play during the 90 mins.The point is though, if he’s so average, why aren’t others doing what he is?
He's a productive player no doubt. Just not especially consistent in his general play during the 90 mins.The point is though, if he’s so average, why aren’t others doing what he is?
He's a productive player no doubt. Just not especially consistent in his general play during the 90 mins.
For a start, the players he was compared to in the stat that was posted. I'd say that contemporaries such as Odegaard and Palmer are less gun-slingy too.Well, who is? I think it's generally the case that the contributions players make during the course of a game tend to cluster. Particularly for those who have a high volume of impactful actions. I don't think it's more the case with him than with others.
Gerrard was often inconsistent in his general play. Don't put him in the same category of players as De Bruyne, Ødegaard etc. He was a better player than Bruno overall, no doubt, he's had more to his game (although the biggest upgrade was probably his physicality), but he suffered from the same issues as our Portuguese.For a start, the players he was compared to in the stat that was posted. I'd say that contemporaries such as Odegaard and Palmer are less gun-slingy too.
Okay. My point is just that it's not like the normal thing you can expect is that a good offensive player is more or less equally in evidence throughout the course of a game. And it depends also on the rest of the team. In any case, I'd be rather more focused on the output than on how evenly it's spread.For a start, the players he was compared to in the stat that was posted. I'd say that contemporaries such as Odegaard and Palmer are less gun-slingy too.
And back then he would have suited football more than now.this absurd standard for bruno - demonstrate that he has a way higher output for goals and assists that gerrard, and people want to talk about him being erratic- as if Gerrard was this consistent player. He was very often a hollywood pass player and very rarely turned up against united. Fernandes isnt the best midfielder we've ever had, but he is criminally underrated by many.
On the contrary, I'm pretty sure he's going to be Amorim's clearest no-brainer, other than who's starting in goal. "Slightly above average" is Trumpian-level off the mark.
Is it really? Or is that an overreaction for a reactions sake?Its funny that the caf know so much about football, coaching and players, compared to Manutd managers.
Ole, Rangnick, Ten Hag and now RVN play him in every game, its almost as if they dont know anything...
Now its the same talk as before Ten Hag came, he will drop Bruno.. he wont get in etc...
Is it really? Or is that an overreaction for a reactions sake?
I am a regular in this thread and I wouldn't say it is a lot at all. No question, a few don't like him (me included) but wouldn't say there are many who really think he wouldn't play under Amorim.I have seen alot of fans say.. Bruno is in trouble under Amorim or doesn't get in.
Different question. I also think we should have cashed in but thats a different matter. This thread is notorious for two things - some posters greatly overemphasize his share of the overall problems of the team setup and some posters who feel the need to "jump in and defend their captain against the legions of hell" even when the clear majority on here is in favor of the player (for reasons I personally don't get but that is my thing I guess, I still acknowledge that the majority sees things differently).Alot of fans have wanted Bruno gone for a while now actually.
He may be principled but no player owes ETH an apology.No wonder he felt like apologising to EtH. At least our captain is principled.
As I stated in my post, I don't mind him taking risks, trying to pick out a runner can go wrong.God how sick am I of the Football Manager generation. Bruno has been wonderful, creative, passionate, unpredictable since he came here. He takes risks. Embrace the challenge, the human sweat and blood; give the controller a rest.
As I stated in my post, I don't mind him taking risks, trying to pick out a runner can go wrong.
He is careless with flicks, misses simple short passes in dangerous areas and they go against us. Then he throws his arms in the air moaning at others.
I put my controllers down years ago lool
Flicks can come off though.. of memory, the goal against Sheffield United Rashford scored came from a Bruno click at half way line..
This season a couple games ago v Chelsea, his flick put Zirkzee through. I understand fans would rather us play safe and keep the ball but if we want to create chances, risks have to be taken.
I agree though, when he misplaces a pass or something, he throws his hands as if its the other players fault. That needs to be cut out.
Oh thats fine, I know its not directed at me because I like Bruno. I know his negatives generally are highlighted all the time but I appreciate his creative ability.Indeed. A recent Bruno flick delivered Hojlund's last league goal to complete a 2-1 comeback. Nobody was moaning about flicks then.
Not directed at you, more a general statement, to me it feels incredible that there's so much chat on the CAF about Bruno's negatives. His positives have him at a level that most players in world football are nowhere near.
Oh thats fine, I know its not directed at me because I like Bruno. I know his negatives generally are highlighted all the time but I appreciate his creative ability.
The Hojlund one is a good one because the fans who want him to take less risk would be moaning that we dont create chances passing it sideways and backwards.
Its interesting because fans want 90% pass accuracy but dont want sideways passing. Its almost as if they expect someone to play a creative pass that has 100% accuracy. Even KDB has similar pass accuracy to Bruno.
Yea but what about that misplaced pass?
I used to say this, but his performance against City in the cup final was his best ever performance for us, imo.if ony he could it against a top team
Either you aren't reading the other posts or you don't understand them. Or you willfully misrepresent them. But what the heck right, lets have the passing accuracy discussion for the 900th time.Oh thats fine, I know its not directed at me because I like Bruno. I know his negatives generally are highlighted all the time but I appreciate his creative ability.
The Hojlund one is a good one because the fans who want him to take less risk would be moaning that we dont create chances passing it sideways and backwards.
Its interesting because fans want 90% pass accuracy but dont want sideways passing. Its almost as if they expect someone to play a creative pass that has 100% accuracy. Even KDB has similar pass accuracy to Bruno.
It’s tough to have a player who’s supposed to be the best on the pitch and our captain have a full month of performances where’s he’s one of the worst out there. That’s a difficult player to build around.
Occasionally exasperating player but always comes across as a genuinely top-notch person.
Seems the Portuguese FA are saving the pennies, using Easyjet instead of their national airline TAP, still they could have used Ryanair!
Talk about consistency and then not adding the minutes or matches they were involved in. Has statman dave found changed his account name?
It’s an agenda. Caf is full of them.Why are you so eager and determined to discredit Bruno’s numbers?
How am I discrediting them? Goals and assists are facts, no one is trying to say that he hasn't scored them. But comparing them to some seemingly deliberately choosen players to proof some sort of "consistency" seems odd to me - because as far as I know, De Bruyne and Son have lengthy injury periods. Given Brunos incredible fitness it will be difficult to find a player to compare him to - which would make it selfexplanatory to add matches or minutes.Why are you so eager and determined to discredit Bruno’s numbers?
That’s bonkers but his bottom level and our complete over reliance on him does often hinder us even in matches where we are clear favourites We need to find a way to get Bruno involved but not as our sole creator. It’s so easy for decent teams to neutralise us by just stopping Bruno and getting in Rashfords face. It’s game over 9/10
How am I discrediting them? Goals and assists are facts, no one is trying to say that he hasn't scored them. But comparing them to some seemingly deliberately choosen players to proof some sort of "consistency" seems odd to me - because as far as I know, De Bruyne and Son have lengthy injury periods. Given Brunos incredible fitness it will be difficult to find a player to compare him to - which would make it selfexplanatory to add matches or minutes.
If that is already an agenda, then some of you guys have agendas going as well. Yesterday we almost had another turn of the passing accuracy discussion...
Is it deliberately chosen players or just a ranked list of those with the most goal involvements in all competitions since Bruno joined us? Does not having a per 90 figure drastically change the impression?How am I discrediting them? Goals and assists are facts, no one is trying to say that he hasn't scored them. But comparing them to some seemingly deliberately choosen players to proof some sort of "consistency" seems odd to me - because as far as I know, De Bruyne and Son have lengthy injury periods. Given Brunos incredible fitness it will be difficult to find a player to compare him to - which would make it selfexplanatory to add matches or minutes.
If that is already an agenda, then some of you guys have agendas going as well. Yesterday we almost had another turn of the passing accuracy discussion...
Whatever makes you happy. I’m delighted we have one of the best players in the league for the past five years when it comes to goal involvements. Playing more and still having those type of numbers is even more impressive if anything.
I don’t have a need to try to find ways to make his incredible numbers somehow less valid.
You could substitute Bruno's name and find the same in pretty much all the player threads, I sometimes wonder why people bother because it seems to me they don't enjoy footballIts quite ironic that when players are not fit, it is a black mark against them, they cant stay fit etc...
When we have a player who is always fit.. creating chances and scoring goals.. fans use him being available as a black mark on him..
Well.. he plays more mins so he would have more G/A.
Certain posters dislike Bruno to a point that they will say anything to discredit him.
I didn't visit the caf during the Vidic/Terry years, or when Evra/Cole were in their prime, but I like to imagine that any stats showing they were one of the best and most consistent performers in their position were immediately counteracted with posts about how their appearance numbers inflated their stats, which was therefore unfairly excluding the injury-prone greats such as Ledley King.Its quite ironic that when players are not fit, it is a black mark against them, they cant stay fit etc...
When we have a player who is always fit.. creating chances and scoring goals.. fans use him being available as a black mark on him..
Well.. he plays more mins so he would have more G/A.
Certain posters dislike Bruno to a point that they will say anything to discredit him.