No, but if quality is the barometer (which I expect it will be), then there will likely be no guarantees for Bruno.Bruno isn't that shit, mate.
No, but if quality is the barometer (which I expect it will be), then there will likely be no guarantees for Bruno.Bruno isn't that shit, mate.
Would he though , his only saving grace creativity is highly dependent on him being given all the freedom to try low percentage play .Would have been some player if he could take care of the ball.
Hopefully this only happens if we get a manager who finally polishes Bruno's possession game.Problem is Amorim will play him even more then ETH if that's even possible
Unfortunately that's not possible there is a reason why he plays the way he plays .Hopefully this only happens if we get a manager who finally polishes Bruno's possession game.
If Bruno remains undroppable playing like he did for Ole and ten Hag, it'll be worrying because we need to finally start prioritising playing players who are comfortable under pressure, and value possession.
Be interesting to see. Bruno has workrate I think if Amorim hones it. Can he up his general quality of play outside of three chances created? Can he get him back to Bruno of first 18 months? Will system suit Bruno?When Gyokeres comes, Bruno’s gonna cook
Exactly. Our attack isn't going to reach another level by taking Bruno out and replacing him with a less productive midfielder.Bruno has a lot of faults but he's the only player in this set up who really tries to make things happen (besides Casemiro bizarrely). Honestly, without Bruno we would probably just pass the ball from side to side and draw blanks week in week out.
Think the hope is the team collectively creates more through better coaching/tactics and a higher floor of technical and athletic ability. If Bruno can fit into that then great. But if he doesn’t it’s better not to try and shoehorn him in anyways in the name of “productivity” because his floor performance these days is far too low to try and build a top side around.Exactly. Our attack isn't going to reach another level by taking Bruno out and replacing him with a less productive midfielder.
Was he all over the place?Scholes talking about his positioning, which I've been saying for months.
First half his was on that "im going to pull out to the right" trip.Was he all over the place?
Get him off corners NOW. Absolute liability.
He monopolises set pieces because he's desperate for stats.
He told you this? Or is it another case of peak armchair football psychology?
He monopolises set pieces because he's desperate for stats. He is an absolute hindrance taking shooting free kicks and corners.
You think an individual player decides who takes set pieces? Surely it's the management team?He monopolises set pieces because he's desperate for stats. He is an absolute hindrance taking shooting free kicks and corners.
And Ruud agreeing. In fact Ruud pre-empted it if anything. Bruno is such a passion merchant. I know his heart is in the right place and he's desperate to help his team, but he needs to trust the team - that's good leadership.Scholes talking about his positioning, which I've been saying for months.
The Ruud and Scholes love was both ways, the runs are actually similar to Hojlunds. It's just a shame the team is a state - i believe there is a good player there.And Ruud agreeing. In fact Ruud pre-empted it if anything. Bruno is such a passion merchant. I know his heart is in the right place and he's desperate to help his team, but he needs to trust the team - that's good leadership.
One could argue Bruno being all over the pitch could be a reason our forwards struggle at times, he should be closer to them.
Scholesey loves Ruud though, doesn't he? He's already on record saying Ruud is the forward he enjoyed playing with most
@Scandi Red what do you think? You seeing the same yet?,