Brexited | the worst threads live the longest

Do you think there will be a Deal or No Deal?


  • Total voters
    194
  • Poll closed .
The spirit of the GFA is that Ireland, as a whole, and separately, is entitled to self-determination. A large number of the population hold Irish/EU passports, and see themselves as Irish. Many unionists in the north want no hard border either, see the statements of the business community etc...

Seems like some Brexit people are only noticing now (that it has become a stone in their shoe) the Irish Peace Process and the various agreements brokered over the past half century. Peter Brooke: Britain has no "selfish strategic or economic interest" in Northern Ireland. Downing Street Declaration in 1993: "The British Government agree that it is for the people of the island of Ireland alone, by agreement between the two parts respectively, to exercise their right of self-determination on the basis of consent, freely and concurrently given, North and South, to bring about a united Ireland, if that is their wish".

But the North doesn't agree to a border in the Irish Sea, and the agreement can't prevent the UK leaving if its people decide they want to leave the EU, CU and SM.

Unless you think the GFA means the UK can't ever leave them. Is that your point?

The whole thing seems to me a bit invented after the event which no one saw coming.
 
Catch yourself on. I don’t support Brexit so stop with the whataboutery regarding Brexiteers as I couldn’t care less what they said and people like Farage don’t represent me.

I was simply making the point that people like yourself dismissing others genuine concerns about the EU as nothing more than neanderthals grunting about “bleedin foreigners” and “take back control” are part of what allowed leave to win. People voted in protest (ok misguidedly) but because they are sick of the status quo.

His point, which is completely true is that if people voted in protest, then it justifies the names they were called. It's the very essence of idiocy, or cutting your nose off to spite your face. What a normal person should have done, is separate the two, vote not in protest but for actual reasons they would stand behind, and deal with the name calling as a separate issue. Abandoning all logic and sense and chalking it up to a protest vote and then saying it's someone elses fault they did something is just stupidity and it doesn't excuse anyones actions.
 
Last edited:
I have a feeling this is a plot from the hardest of Brexiteers in the Tory party.

They’re forcing a vote of no confidence and will then vote in favour of May.

May will then be granted immunity for the next 12 months. This means that it will be her deal or no deal and they know that no deal is likely to win over her deal.

So they’re effectively forcing a no deal Brexit.

Hiya
 
Catch yourself on. I don’t support Brexit so stop with the whataboutery regarding Brexiteers as I couldn’t care less what they said and people like Farage don’t represent me.

I was simply making the point that people like yourself dismissing others genuine concerns about the EU as nothing more than neanderthals grunting about “bleedin foreigners” and “take back control” are part of what allowed leave to win. People voted in protest (ok misguidedly) but because they are sick of the status quo.

No. People voting leave is what allowed leave to win. Those who voted leave to stick it to people like me are beyond help anyway, there's no point in being super careful not to hurt their feelings, they don't give a flying feck about mine.

If people are fed up with status quo how about changing the status instead of creating an imaginary foe to blame all your woe's on? Now that I could respect...
 
I was simply making the point that people like yourself dismissing others genuine concerns about the EU as nothing more than neanderthals grunting about “bleedin foreigners” and “take back control” are part of what allowed leave to win. People voted in protest (ok misguidedly) but because they are sick of the status quo.

This forum is full of leftists, so that's what you're gonna get.
I've found over the years that there are many older people who voted for brexit who have had enough of immigrants driving down wages, but on the other side there are a large amount of young people who voted remain simply because they're institutionalised, and don't actually know anything about the EU. Then there's the sincere voters on both sides. Most people on this forum are institutionalised young remainers, but not all.
 
Was sat on a train home (I do live in Tory lands) and when 9 hit, I heard "ahh, great news she won" then about 4 other random people chirped up discussing it in elation. Couple of older ladies tarted saying how if there was a vote they'd get rid of Scotland out of the UK and that who cares about NI.
Racist about t
This forum is full of leftists, so that's what you're gonna get.
I've found over the years that there are many older people who voted for brexit who have had enough of immigrants driving down wages, but on the other side there are a large amount of young people who voted remain simply because they're institutionalised, and don't actually know anything about the EU. Then there's the sincere voters on both sides. Most people on this forum are institutionalised young remainers, but not all.
The folk who think their wages have been driven down by immigrants are every bit as institutionalised as the young people you are on about.
 
young people who don't vote for the ruling party and have voted an antiestablishment figure to the leadership of the labour party are institutionalised sheep

ukip isn't sending us their best
 
This forum is full of leftists, so that's what you're gonna get.
I've found over the years that there are many older people who voted for brexit who have had enough of immigrants driving down wages, but on the other side there are a large amount of young people who voted remain simply because they're institutionalised, and don't actually know anything about the EU. Then there's the sincere voters on both sides. Most people on this forum are institutionalised young remainers, but not all.
Right, so what about all those areas voting Leave where there were barely any immigrants at all?
 
Was sat on a train home (I do live in Tory lands) and when 9 hit, I heard "ahh, great news she won" then about 4 other random people chirped up discussing it in elation. Couple of older ladies tarted saying how if there was a vote they'd get rid of Scotland out of the UK and that who cares about NI.
I heard all that last week when I was up at mum's in East Yorkshire (Haltemprice & Howden, wanker David Davis MP). Project fear, immigrants and controlling our own borders and laws were heavily repeated. It was tiresome and you can't fight ideology with logic when it comes to people in their 70s.
 
It's the principle that she needs to try and win confidence votes by seeking to assure her MPs that she won't lead the party in the next election. She's admitting the fact that she understands there is little confidence in her to lead the party to victory.

You don't find this significant?

Apparently she wanted to lead the party into the next election, but her advisers must have explained to her that, to be voted down now by her own party, would be a total humiliation to her personally. To avoid this, she was advised to concede her leadership at a later date.

No quite frankly, I don't. Firstly she can renege on it and secondly I don't think it would matter one jot to these Tory MPs. If Brexit is botched, they will get obliterated in the next elections whoever the leader is.

So if verbal statements matter very little to both the person uttering them and the people who are the intended audience, why would I find it significant?
 
This forum is full of leftists, so that's what you're gonna get.
I've found over the years that there are many older people who voted for brexit who have had enough of immigrants driving down wages, but on the other side there are a large amount of young people who voted remain simply because they're institutionalised, and don't actually know anything about the EU. Then there's the sincere voters on both sides. Most people on this forum are institutionalised young remainers, but not all.

No, most people on this forum are younger people that are statistically more highly educated than the older folk. They seem to hate that, but it doesn't make it any less true. Brushing the younger generation off as 'institutionalised' is a bit of a weird sweeping brush to make, and almost smacks of bitterness.
 
Was sat on a train home (I do live in Tory lands) and when 9 hit, I heard "ahh, great news she won" then about 4 other random people chirped up discussing it in elation. Couple of older ladies tarted saying how if there was a vote they'd get rid of Scotland out of the UK and that who cares about NI.

What a horrible place to live.
 
young people who don't vote for the ruling party and have voted an antiestablishment figure to the leadership of the labour party are institutionalised sheep

ukip isn't sending us their best

Tbf blindly following any ideology, is sheep-like behaviour. Even one that is anti-establishment. On top of that student bases at most (probably all) Unis in this country are very left leaning, since we're talking about young people. So being anti-ruling party means little, in the context of being institutionalised, when it's placing you in the comfort of voting in line with the majority of your peers.
 
Right, so what about all those areas voting Leave where there were barely any immigrants at all?

It's no difference to the BNP and NF complaining about the blacks and Asians stealing jobs. Just racism to hide thier own failings.

Most people who think like that, feel thier entitled to well paid work despite being under skilled, under educated, inexperienced and generally lazy.

If semi literate immigrants are making more money than you, it's your own fault. These people are capitalists when it suits them and then as soon as there is competition they want the state to end immigration to protect them.
 
Given that she's attempted to take every step up to now without parliament I think it's a possibility she revokes article 50 and resigns if she can't get her deal across the line. (Not saying that it will happen, but given the historical clusterfeck no deal would be I think it's a possibility).
 
With the Tories and Labour seemingly racing each other to see who is more useless, it’s a crying shame there is no third party who could come out and support remain and clean up in a GE.
 
This forum is full of leftists, so that's what you're gonna get.
I've found over the years that there are many older people who voted for brexit who have had enough of immigrants driving down wages, but on the other side there are a large amount of young people who voted remain simply because they're institutionalised, and don't actually know anything about the EU. Then there's the sincere voters on both sides. Most people on this forum are institutionalised young remainers, but not all.

It really isn't and has been getting more right wing over the last few years.

You also don't need to be institutionalised, young or old to see that any form of Brexit is going to be incredibly damaging.
 
Tbf blindly following any ideology, is sheep-like behaviour. Even one that is anti-establishment. On top of that student bases at most (probably all) Unis in this country are very left leaning, since we're talking about young people. So being anti-ruling party means little, in the context of being institutionalised, when it's placing you in the comfort of voting in line with the majority of your peers.
ah knew it was the unis what done it, getting shitfaced and last minute essays are basically points 1 and 2 in how to brainwash someone
 
It really isn't and has been getting more right wing over the last few years.

You also don't need to be institutionalised, young or old to see that any form of Brexit is going to be incredibly damaging.

I disagree, to quote somebody in another thread, the 'Caf is essentially a "left wing echo chamber"

:D
 
It's no difference to the BNP and NF complaining about the blacks and Asians stealing jobs. Just racism to hide thier own failings.

Most people who think like that, feel thier entitled to well paid work despite being under skilled, under educated, inexperienced and generally lazy.

If semi literate immigrants are making more money than you, it's your own fault. These people are capitalists when it suits them and then as soon as there is competition they want the state to end immigration to protect them.
Fair points, but answer me this. 4 towns off the top of my head local to me are literally full of eastern European immigrants. This is especially a problem in the two smaller town, in one of them they stand on the pavements all day long, shouting and roaring, very intimidating especially for women on their own, cheeky bastards too as I’ve heard of people catching them leaning on their cars etc when parked on the street. In another town the Romanians had to be chased out of it as they had been caught carrying out a spate of break-ins, the local catholic and the protestant churches were both done.

Now these people, the vast majority don’t seem to work, they but the government seem to be providing for them not a bother. Am I or is my local community racist for wanting something done about this blight?
 
Ok, but why is it Ok for the EU to put that border in the Irish Sea against the wishes of the Unionist

It wouldn't be the EU putting a border anywhere, it would be the UK who could/would put a border in the Irish sea to preserve the Good Friday Agreement if/when the UK leaves the EU.

The Good Friday Agreement is about Northern Ireland and Ireland not Britain so different customs arrangements between NI and Britain wouldn't affect the agreement i don't think.

Plus i'm not sure how many unionists would actually be against a border in the Irish sea if it meant staying in the customs union and keeping things as they are now. Sure the DUP are against it but they are head bangers, that are going against the wishes of some prominent groups here like the Ulster Farmers Union and Northern Ireland business federations that wanted to go with Mays Brexit deal.

but some how its an affront to all that's holy for the UK to be forced to put it on the former border against republican wishes as the GFA gives equal weight to both?

It's not a republican thing mate almost all the people in Ireland North & South are against a hard border.

The numbers in the GFA referendum were 78% in the North and 96% in the south, all those people voted yes to the GFA to have the current arrangements.

It will probably not surprise you that the DUP were the only party that campaigned for people to vote no to the Good Friday Agreement and peace.
 
It really isn't and has been getting more right wing over the last few years.

You also don't need to be institutionalised, young or old to see that any form of Brexit is going to be incredibly damaging.
Is this getting much coverage in Aus, Wib? Curious given the number of challenges to the various PMs over there in recent years, must seem like a routine occurrence.
 
Fair points, but answer me this. 4 towns off the top of my head local to me are literally full of eastern European immigrants. This is especially a problem in the two smaller town, in one of them they stand on the pavements all day long, shouting and roaring, very intimidating especially for women on their own, cheeky bastards too as I’ve heard of people catching them leaning on their cars etc when parked on the street. In another town the Romanians had to be chased out of it as they had been caught carrying out a spate of break-ins, the local catholic and the protestant churches were both done.

Now these people, the vast majority don’t seem to work, they but the government seem to be providing for them not a bother. Am I or is my local community racist for wanting something done about this blight?

I'm suffering the exact same problems. A lot of the Roma gypsies are utter scumbags. I just don't see how pigeon holing these people with hard working Poles and other Eastern Europeans helps? I also don't see why we have to wreck all the good things about the EU to sort out the riff raff?

I think;

1. Police could do a lot more. Move them on, put them in the cells if they argue, tackle street drinking, take a hard line zero nonsense approach. Get tough on modern slavery and prostitution (these lot are big into it).

2. Local councils could do more by being hard on anti social behaviour. Stop paying rent for anyone who is behaving in an anti social manner. Regularly inspect homes for overcrowding. Don't provide free translators to anyone.

3. They cause trouble across Europe, maybe there was a deal to be done Europe wide to refuse free movement to people with criminal records and deport those who commit crimes within 10 years of moving.

=====

For me the bottom line is trust. The EU might well be bad for us, but I don't trust the names and faces associated with Brexit to be working for a greater good.
 
But the North doesn't agree to a border in the Irish Sea, and the agreement can't prevent the UK leaving if its people decide they want to leave the EU, CU and SM.

Unless you think the GFA means the UK can't ever leave them. Is that your point?

The whole thing seems to me a bit invented after the event which no one saw coming.

It was all agreed and lodged with the United Nations in 1998 so it hasn't just been invented after the Brexit vote mate.

The truth probably is Cameron and the Tories never gave Northern Ireland a second thought when setting the referendum up in 2016. I certainly don't remember many if any of the British politicians talking about The GFA or the potential implications Brexit could have for Northern Ireland in the run up to the Referendum.
 
You are quite right. The problem is that most people in the rest of the UK (this is how it appears) - particularly those in power - do not give a toss about Ireland or NI and have been totally tripped up by the border issue because none of them gave it a single thought. The fact that there still appear to be calls for a no-deal from many sadly proves that now they do know about the border, they just do not care what happens over here and would happily plough on ahead with a no-deal knowingly destroying our economy in NI and endangering our hard won peace.

I would say thats definitely been the case mate, with most Tories it's probably a case of don't know or care about Ireland.

As somebody from a broadly unionist background (though I am fairly neutral about it all generally) I have to wonder if other people from my own background will start realising that the rest of the UK couldn't give a feck about us and will start to question 'our precious union' which only appears to be there to further the interests of (little) England. Hense why calls for a united Ireland are growing.

I've spoken to a few friends and guys i work with over the last few months from a similar background and some of them have came to feel that way.
 
It was all agreed and lodged with the United Nations in 1998 so it hasn't just been invented after the Brexit vote mate.

The truth probably is Cameron and the Tories never gave Northern Ireland a second thought when setting the referendum up in 2016. I certainly don't remember many if any of the British politicians talking about The GFA or the potential implications Brexit could have for Northern Ireland in the run up to the Referendum.

Aye, as a general rule it's usually safe to assume that people in mainland UK both care far less and know far less about NI than they should. Brexit has been a rather neat example of this, as demonstrated by the half-baked opinions on the issue that are still being put forward in this thread today.
 
It really isn't and has been getting more right wing over the last few years.

You also don't need to be institutionalised, young or old to see that any form of Brexit is going to be incredibly damaging.
I've no doubt that if we had a caf poll a huge majority would agree with you.

:)
 
Last edited:
E5QmKfv.png


UwBEe9L.png
 
ay Agreement and peace.[/QUOTE]
It wouldn't be the EU putting a border anywhere, it would be the UK who could/would put a border in the Irish sea to preserve the Good Friday Agreement if/when the UK leaves the EU.

The Good Friday Agreement is about Northern Ireland and Ireland not Britain so different customs arrangements between NI and Britain wouldn't affect the agreement i don't think.

Plus i'm not sure how many unionists would actually be against a border in the Irish sea if it meant staying in the customs union and keeping things as they are now. Sure the DUP are against it but they are head bangers, that are going against the wishes of some prominent groups here like the Ulster Farmers Union and Northern Ireland business federations that wanted to go with Mays Brexit deal.



It's not a republican thing mate almost all the people in Ireland North & South are against a hard border.

The numbers in the GFA referendum were 78% in the North and 96% in the south, all those people voted yes to the GFA to have the current arrangements.

It will probably not surprise you that the DUP were the only party that campaigned for people to vote no to the Good Friday Agreement and peace.

I don't think that's right,

It would undermine one side of the agreement because the people elected by the Unionists say they won't agree to a border in the North Sea. So if the GFA is the be all and end all when it comes to Brexit then the border has to be agreed by both parties in the North or the GFA is meaningless.

Also just so I know where you stand, you think that the UK shouldn't be allowed to leave the EU /CU/SM with all the territory it entered the common market with because of the GFA.
 
Is this getting much coverage in Aus, Wib? Curious given the number of challenges to the various PMs over there in recent years, must seem like a routine occurrence.

We haven't had a new PM in weeks now ;)

It is getting some coverage, particularly on the quality tv stations - SBS and ABC. I don't really read Australian newspapers as the AU edition of The Guardian has much better reporting and many have pay walls anyway.
 
Ok, but why is it Ok for the EU to put that border in the Irish Sea against the wishes of the Unionist but some how its an affront to all that's holy for the UK to be forced to put it on the former border against republican wishes as the GFA gives equal weight to both?

Because the EU doesnt want a border. He wants the UK to stay in. Still does. Is the UK that wants out and one if the consequences of getting out of the CU, i remind, a UK choice, is a hard border. EU has to protect his citizens on immigration and consumers safety (like the mad cows) as UK will not be bind on EU regulations. And frankly, the EU can't go on goid faith on a serious topic like that. Specially after the many insults that the UK leadership had been doing on the whole process and even sonetimes talking not to pay up what UK would owe. No, is not equal weight when tge EU wants the UK to stay, has a solution for a no border (stay in the CU) but the UK says no. It's UK decision so the responsability, therefore the weight of breaking the GFA is sokely from the UK
 
Because the EU doesnt want a border. He wants the UK to stay in. Still does. Is the UK that wants out and one if the consequences of getting out of the CU, i remind, a UK choice, is a hard border. EU has to protect his citizens on immigration and consumers safety (like the mad cows) as UK will not be bind on EU regulations. And frankly, the EU can't go on goid faith on a serious topic like that. Specially after the many insults that the UK leadership had been doing on the whole process and even sonetimes talking not to pay up what UK would owe. No, is not equal weight when tge EU wants the UK to stay, has a solution for a no border (stay in the CU) but the UK says no. It's UK decision so the responsability, therefore the weight of breaking the GFA is sokely from the UK

Well put and something that a lot of the politicians don't seem to understand. It's our choice and the EU is under no pressure to sort the mess out for us.