Brexited | the worst threads live the longest

Do you think there will be a Deal or No Deal?


  • Total voters
    194
  • Poll closed .
Now, what will do when all the future CEOs decide they cant be fecked going to exclusive universities and joining secret societies to do buttstuff and then not being adequately compensated for all that effort and pressure and responsibility?
 
the aspirational, i earned my money and should get paid lots bullshit falls apart when we have an economy set up to reward people born into wealth more than people who actively contribute to making society better

it falls apart when we have a government driving doctors to strike over wages while house prices double every decade

it falls apart when schools are asking parents to buy supplies and donate money for wages while phillip green is stealing his workers pensions

anyone who buys into that, while voting for the party of jeremy hunt is either a liar a moron
 
i bet there are tons of people who become scientists to get rich

$tephen ''dollar dollar bills y'all'' Hawking
If machines produce everything we need, the outcome will depend on how things are distributed. Everyone can enjoy a life of luxurious leisure if the machine-produced wealth is shared, or most people can end up miserably poor if the machine-owners successfully lobby against wealth redistribution. So far, the trend seems to be toward the second option, with technology driving ever-increasing inequality.

Bah what did he know, the big thicko.
 
it's amazing how the people who promote a "work hard get paid" economic system often denigrate hard working professions like cleaners and fruit pickers, then use doctors as their go to example when we live in a country where doctors are routinely fecked by the government, or science researchers who frequently work in underfunded labs and barely get paid enough to pay rent in the cities where science research takes place
 
The government will provide everything so what do you need to learn to read and write for?

Most people won't be arguing for the country to give its people everything - a basic social safety net to ensure people can live comfortably is fair. I'd imagine most people in such a position will still want to do well for themselves, and will still have passions etc they wish to pursue. Indeed as automation accelerates current economic models will mean a lot of people find themselves out of work anyway irrespective of how ambitious or hard-working they are. As a result of that the government are probably going to need to provide for people to a certain extent.

I'm all for hard work and don't doubt you've done well for yourself through that - but at the same time, in any capitalistic system, if everyone hypothetically does work hard you're still going to inevitably end up with people who don't really benefit economically because they've been beaten out by others. Which means that while, yeah, hard work is obviously important, it's no guarantee of success. Plenty of ambitious, intelligent people don't get anywhere in life because they either don't get the opportunities, are unlucky, or have, say, strenuous family commitments that need to be met and which stop them from pursuing potential success economically.
 
And don't forget that cleaners deserve at least double the pay of GPs. Because feck me GPs have it easy.

Now, what will do when all the future doctors decide they can't be fecked going through 15 years of study and training, and then not being adequately compensated for all that effort and pressure and responsibility?

Nah it will be fine, the cleaners work really fecking hard so we can just hand them the stethoscopes and scalpels.

Many doctors in the UK are already thinking in this exact way and are leaving/ thinking of leaving, including me. As a direct result of years of appalling government policies but especially after 10 years of the most right wing government in years so not sure it makes sense to say this government are so amazingly aspirational for those who work hard.

Something for another thread too but they have just spent £700,000 absolutely crushing a junior doctor in his attempt to win whistle blowing rights for doctors by threatening him with all the legal costs if he didn't win his case.

The whole government and the current situation are a shambles.
 
The concept of equality under a socialist society is good in theory but it’s seriously flawed in practice and can likely never work.

Socialisms biggest challenge is human nature and thus far it hasn’t been able to succeed against greed, envy and spite among other things.

It is unlikely for it to be able to overcome any of these challenges in our lifetime.
 
80k is not fantastical at all. It is not uncommon for a person running a business with 50 people in it to be on 6 figures these days. And it is not just bosses either. I have a skilled workforce and there are at least 5 shopfloor engineers in the business who (with overtime) earn £65k+ every year. One guy regularly earns £75k.

You are completely out of touch if you don't belive 80k isn't a fantastical sum

The high tax threshold starts at £46k so with NI I take home less than half of what I earn.

For people who earn over 100k it is worse. because for every £2 over that earned you lose £1 off your tax free allowance. At the moment that is about £11.5k. So if your earnings get to £123k you have lost all the tax-free allowance meaning that you start paying tax at 20% from zero and the 40% band kicks in around £35k. My benefits in kind - i.e car, fuel and health cover take me to that threshold so that is why I clear less than 50% of what I earn. If that situation worsened then I there is not doubt in my mind that this would have an effect on business creation. You'd get CEO's retraining to be self-employed plumbers because they'd be better off with none of the responsibility. How does that help jobs?

If there's a demand for the jobs the ceo who's retrained as a plumber has given up then those jobs will just be taken by someone else

You are right this is still more than a lot of people. But you should look into post war tax rates. Take 1975/76 when I first started. There was hardly any tax free allowance and the rate started at 33%. High earners were really targeted paying up to 90%. We had a lot of nationalised industries with unions who were used to having their pay demands met. These pay demands were met by the UK tax payer. Which in turn meant the probability of taxes reducing was almost zero. The country's public services were actually crap and in no way reflected that tax take. Loads of wealthy folk left the country and although I don't have data to hand I would wager that the rate of new business creation was nowhere near what it was in the late 80's when taxes became more business friendly.

The thing to bear in mind is that in order for the government to run those public services (such as they were) required the burden to be shared by the general populace i.e 33% in the £. The tax burden is similar now but it is not taken at source as it was then and much is put into VAT and other things.

Thanks for the history lesson but fact is people set up business in high tax Britain. They do it today in the high tax scandi nations. America has a very high corporate tax rate and they still set up business

This is why Labour are lying about their spending plans. To get anywhere near funding them they would have to take it from the whole of the workforce and not just the high paid and businesses. That is to say nothing of the borrowing.

Funny you say this because the party that loves direct taxes are the Tories, its the most regressive form of tax hurting the poorest most

And one more thing. You obviously think that I am some high-flying elitist rather than the work-a-day boss I am, along with thousand of others in this country. Most of whom are doing their level best to keep their businesses afloat and, if they are like me, it's not all for selfish reasons. Some, you may be surprised to learn, actually care quite deeply about their employees. But if you want to characterise us all has Victorian work-house bourgeois chucking 9 year old boys into machinery for no wages, then that is your prerogative.

I just think you are out of touch, and haven't a clue what earning 80k would feel for 95% of this country

You presumably are on this site because you support United. I would venture that you should look in the direction of players that earn 300k a week and clubs that can spend £200m on a kid that happens to be good at kicking a ball around.

I don't care what they earn, only they pay their taxes. Also do you think a footballer isn't going to be a footballer because he'll be in the upper tax band?
 
The concept of equality under a socialist society is good in theory but it’s seriously flawed in practice and can likely never work.

Socialisms biggest challenge is human nature and thus far it hasn’t been able to succeed against greed, envy and spite among other things.

It is unlikely for it to be able to overcome any of these challenges in our lifetime.

You’re mixing up Socialism and Communism.
 
Can we get back to Brexit and set up a separate thread on the merits of redistributive taxation and socialism?

As for Jezza, if he doesn’t come up with a more constructive solution than rejecting May’s deal in order to renegotiate for unicorns (during a transition period which is only operative if the UK has signed the withdrawal agreement), then there will be significantly less wealth to redistribute anyway.
 
You are completely out of touch if you don't belive 80k isn't a fantastical sum.

Just shows how skewed the wealth distribution in the UK is. If you make 80k and are moaning about paying a few extra quid to have a functioning NHS and public services then there is no hope of changing your mind. After all, your employees and their families (the people that work to make you wealthy) depend on that system in order to live. You may benefit from Private healthcare but if your workers can't pay for healthcare, childcare etc then your workforce is going to struggle to support your lifestyle longterm.

I make less than half of that and would happily pay a little extra in tax if it meant the NHS was a world leading healthcare system.
 
Just shows how skewed the wealth distribution in the UK is. If you make 80k and are moaning about paying a few extra quid to have a functioning NHS and public services then there is no hope of changing your mind. After all, your employees and their families (the people that work to make you wealthy) depend on that system in order to live. You may benefit from Private healthcare but if your workers can't pay for healthcare, childcare etc then your workforce is going to struggle to support your lifestyle longterm.

Yeah I don't get it at all either. I mean I get basic human greed but the logical conclusion in the rich hoarding all the wealth and feckin everyone else over is gated communities and no go zones outside of them. Is that really what people want the future to look like because that is the way it's going.
 
Just shows how skewed the wealth distribution in the UK is. If you make 80k and are moaning about paying a few extra quid to have a functioning NHS and public services then there is no hope of changing your mind. After all, your employees and their families (the people that work to make you wealthy) depend on that system in order to live. You may benefit from Private healthcare but if your workers can't pay for healthcare, childcare etc then your workforce is going to struggle to support your lifestyle longterm.

I make less than half of that and would happily pay a little extra in tax if it meant the NHS was a world leading healthcare system.

My workforce are paid well.

I don't mind paying extra tax. In fact I already do by virtue of the fact that over half my income is taxed at 40%.

I just object to Labour placing their funding plans wholly on the higher rate taxpayer. a) higher rate payers shoulder a large proportion of the burden already b) taxing them alone more to fund their spending plans will never cover it.

They will have to tax the whole working population at rates at 1970's levels and borrow substantially.

They can't say that though because the populist Robin Hood gloss will rub off.
 
Don't worry, all these socialist/communist idealists soon change their tune when they get a bit of money themselves.

Rubbish. Compared to when I worked an entry level job, I give more to charity, do volunteer work and would happily pay a bit more tax now that I earn at a higher level. Not everyone is driven by greed.
 
Don't worry, all these socialist/communist idealists soon change their tune when they get a bit of money themselves.

Any stats to back that up? Should be easy to see a trend of those who pay a higher rate moving away from Labour once they do?

If anything I've become more socialist the more money and higher salary I've obtained. Why would my opinion on what's just change with additional security?