Brexited | the worst threads live the longest

Do you think there will be a Deal or No Deal?


  • Total voters
    194
  • Poll closed .
Are you on a WUM or something here? You do realize that goods becoming more expensive to import from Ireland (and the EU) to the UK is a bad thing for the UK, right? You also realize that exporting goods from the UK to Ireland (and the EU) becoming more expensive is a bad thing for the UK, right?
I've already agreed about the UK's exports so please don't mention that again, I also agree extra costs would result in some reduction in Ireland's exports, but if you're producing stuff Britain needs or wants then there would only be the massive reduction you described earlier if Britain was obtaining the same elsewhere, instead of from Ireland. So if you believe Britain will find cheaper alternatives then you are pointing out a benefit, like it or not. Personally I doubt Ireland's exports to the UK will drop much at all, which is why I questioned your original assertion. I'm quite willing to be persuaded differently though, by a reasoned argument.
 
I've already agreed about the UK's exports so please don't mention that again, I also agree extra costs would result in some reduction in Ireland's exports, but if you're producing stuff Britain needs or wants then there would only be the massive reduction you described earlier if Britain was obtaining the same elsewhere, instead of from Ireland. So if you believe Britain will find cheaper alternatives then you are pointing out a benefit, like it or not. Personally I doubt Ireland's exports to the UK will drop much at all, which is why I questioned your original assertion. I'm quite willing to be persuaded differently though, by a reasoned argument.

Even in this scenario, the speed at which the UK receives the goods will drop. Customs checks if it comes from Ireland, increased distances, lead time and reliability risks related to that if from further afield
 
So it's predicting Ireland's growth will slow to 1.5% after 2019. That's not as good as you'd hope for but it's not cataclysmic either.
Even in this scenario, the speed at which the UK receives the goods will drop. Customs checks if it comes from Ireland, increased distances, lead time and reliability risks related to that if from further afield
I know mate, just because I pointed out one slight benefit, alleged by someone else, doesn't mean I'm a Brexiter.
 
Is this the one that's after 15 years? I voted remain because I thought the economic damage of leaving would outweigh any other factors, but this doesn't seem a worst-case scenario at all really. It's how we would deal with reduced tax revenue in the first years that worries me.
The mother of all austerity. Hammond would wank hinself to death. He's already said we would require another decade of austerity.
 
You realise Ireland is in the top 5 GDP per capita in the world? And top 6 or 7 for GNP... Our economic output per person is nearly twice the UKs. If we get hit harder than UK then there is something way beyond Brexit causing problems for our economy.
Our GDP is completely distorted by the multinationals that come here and sell their goods through Ireland. it rose 25% in 2015 because of Apple!

We are only 25th in the world in median household income, behind the UK, and 11th in average wage.
 
I’m in this camp:


I wouldn’t describe putting more money into the NHS as an investment. You won’t get any decent return on it. The more money you give it, the more money passes right back out to consultants. It’s not equippred to deal with anything but the bare minimum it needs to operate.
 
I cant help but think that Mays speech demanding respect from the EU is actually aimed far more at the upcoming conservative conference

Surely the brexiteers have realised if they can topple her at conference that the subsequent election process for a new leader take them past the deadline of November to get a deal ratified and thus 100% ensure a hard brexit

i think her speech is designed solely for the purpose of getting enough wavering MP's to back her

( I guess the real crux of the issue is would Mogg / Johnson rather do that for ideological reasons - and actually have to implement it and be accountable... or would they rather yah boo from the sidelines and let it all fall apart before mounting a challenge next year - personally I expect the latter )
 
Last edited:
So it's predicting Ireland's growth will slow to 1.5% after 2019. That's not as good as you'd hope for but it's not cataclysmic either.

I know mate, just because I pointed out one slight benefit, alleged by someone else, doesn't mean I'm a Brexiter.

The classified document says a potential worst case is a 7% drop in GDP for Ireland
 
The classified document says a potential worst case is a 7% drop in GDP for Ireland
If I've read it right that's the cumulative effect by 2030, and also 7% less than it would otherwise have been rather than a 7% drop. Again, not what you want but not cataclysmic either. I may have read it wrong though, I'm rushing off to do a fantasy football transfer. Priorities, eh.
 
I've already agreed about the UK's exports so please don't mention that again, I also agree extra costs would result in some reduction in Ireland's exports, but if you're producing stuff Britain needs or wants then there would only be the massive reduction you described earlier if Britain was obtaining the same elsewhere, instead of from Ireland. So if you believe Britain will find cheaper alternatives then you are pointing out a benefit, like it or not. Personally I doubt Ireland's exports to the UK will drop much at all, which is why I questioned your original assertion. I'm quite willing to be persuaded differently though, by a reasoned argument.
Where did I say that Ireland wouldn't still export goods to the UK though? I never said it would drop, not short term, certainly long-term we would look to move to the rest of the EU instead. I said it would be much more expensive for us (and for you) to do so, in the short term, at least. The UK won't be able to find cheaper from elsewhere. That's highly wishful thinking.

I'm not sure how you're getting this "the UK will therefore get goods cheaper from elsewhere which is a benefit" thing from as I never even suggested that could happen.
 
Where did I say that Ireland wouldn't still export goods to the UK though? I never said it would drop, not short term, certainly long-term we would look to move to the rest of the EU instead. I said it would be much more expensive for us (and for you) to do so, in the short term, at least. The UK won't be able to find cheaper from elsewhere. That's highly wishful thinking.

I'm not sure how you're getting this "the UK will therefore get goods cheaper from elsewhere which is a benefit" thing from as I never even suggested that could happen.
Ah my apologies then, we're at cross purposes. In the post I first replied to you talked of being fecked, and of 40% of your products going to the UK, which led me to believe you expected a substantial drop in exports, but if you don't then fair enough. The rest would have followed from that, if you had meant what I assumed you meant. :)
 
Ah my apologies then, we're at cross purposes. In the post I first replied to you talked of being fecked, and of 40% of your products going to the UK, which led me to believe you expected a substantial drop in exports, but if you don't then fair enough. The rest would have followed from that, if you had meant what I assumed you meant. :)
:lol: fair enough.

Obviously everything up to a hard Brexit is pure guesswork, maybe there will be some benefits as it has simply never happened before and can't be judged, but ultimately I do think both of our economies are going to take a massive hit, and maybe even us more so because we are still so reliant on the UK as our 'big brother' stop gap to the rest of the world. At least the UK does have this sort of infrastructure (ports, cargo points etc) in place to somewhat deal.

Mind you, I still think it's our own fault in a way. We should've used all that money we raked in over the celtic tiger years to sort all this out and become more self sufficient instead of wasting it on our inflated welfare and health systems, but that's another discussion.

Even looking at broader metrics, something like 15m people travel between Ireland and the UK every year, imagine what happens when passport checks are suddenly needed? Absolute chaos, I'd wager.
 
I disagree with your long term points completely.

Regardless of the UK dropping your taxes, we'd still be in the EU and you wouldn't. Companies come here because we are the lowest corp-taxed English speaking nation in the EU.

And long term I'm not really worried about exports to the UK. We have been steadily decreasing the amount of trade to the UK for years and increasing to the EU and other countries with trade agreements with the EU. We could easily continue to do that if we need to. That's a huge market. We just don't have the infrastructure for it right now which is the problem.

Short term Brexit would be a disaster for ireland but long-term it'd probably benefit us, eventually. It'll never benefit the UK.
I disagree with your disagreement.

Aren't the top 50 companies in Ireland by turnover either British or American?

Why are they choosing Ireland? Because it's a high tech, low tax, English speaking country, with access to the EU and UK markets.

In a hard brexit, with the UK trying to become a tax haven, the UK could compete with Ireland for American companies looking for an English during tax haven. In a hard brexit, Ireland could lose access to UK markets meeting it less valuable there.

The one big benefit is as the only majority English speaking country in the EU, and that's a big benefit. but I think the UK competing and losing access to the UK will outweigh the benefits
 
That's why I added the GNP figure mate
Our GNP is also completely distorted.

GNI is a far better metric than either GDP or GNI and even then, the IMF had to introduce a brand new metric (GNI*) to make sense of ours because it was so inflated beyond what it really is.
 
I disagree with your disagreement.

Aren't the top 50 companies in Ireland by turnover either British or American?

Why are they choosing Ireland? Because it's a high tech, low tax, English speaking country, with access to the EU and UK markets.

In a hard brexit, with the UK trying to become a tax haven, the UK could compete with Ireland for American companies looking for an English during tax haven. In a hard brexit, Ireland could lose access to UK markets meeting it less valuable there.

The one big benefit is as the only majority English speaking country in the EU, and that's a big benefit. but I think the UK competing and losing access to the UK will outweigh the benefits
I disagree with your disagreement :D

The bolded part, what we lose there is the UK, we keep the EU. 460m vs 65m people, vs moving to the Uk and getting... 65m people.

I agree in the short-term losing access to UK markets will be a major blow to us but a lot of those markets are already moving across to Europe anyway. Plus most of our multinationals are US multinationals, not UK, and they want EU access.
 
I disagree with your disagreement :D

The bolded part, what we lose there is the UK, we keep the EU. 460m vs 65m people, vs moving to the Uk and getting... 65m people.

I agree in the short-term losing access to UK markets will be a major blow to us but a lot of those markets are already moving across to Europe anyway.
I hope you are right.

#stahpbrexit
 
I disagree with your disagreement.

Aren't the top 50 companies in Ireland by turnover either British or American?

Why are they choosing Ireland? Because it's a high tech, low tax, English speaking country, with access to the EU and UK markets.

In a hard brexit, with the UK trying to become a tax haven, the UK could compete with Ireland for American companies looking for an English during tax haven. In a hard brexit, Ireland could lose access to UK markets meeting it less valuable there.

The one big benefit is as the only majority English speaking country in the EU, and that's a big benefit. but I think the UK competing and losing access to the UK will outweigh the benefits
I'm not saying you're wrong but I don't get how they would lose access. How much would tariffs be? What sort of percentage would costs increase by because of customs and so on? I can see it would be more difficult, just asking how much more difficult.
 
Yes, but before ownership and production could stay in the UK and those companies would be able to trade unhindered within the European borders. Now, companies that want to trade in the EU and avoid tariffs will have to ensure that a large part of their business is 1. owned by European entities / citizens, and 2. a certain percentage of production HAS to be completed inside the borders of the EU.

Years ago, Dell moved it's computer assembly business from Ireland to Poland because the jobs were unskilled and the pay requirement was only minimum wage, and it just so happened Poland's unskilled labour was far cheaper than Irelands. That kind of move is fine, but when its high skilled labor jobs that are moving its another story. Take Rolls Royce jet engines as an example. The biggest earner for Rolls Royce on jet engines is the aftermarket servicing of the engines, not the sales of the engine. What happens when a services job like that is moved from its base in the UK? Or, Nissan in the northeast, something like 5000 employees, what happens if that shuts up shop? That's a pretty big domino to lose.

What I see potentially happening in the aftermath of what looks like now will be a no deal is that income taxes will go up so that the government can subsidise businesses to stay in the UK and try to offset any incurred expenses with business subsidies, like reduced corporation tax or jobs creation incentives.

At the end of the day, it will be the British tax payer that will foot the bill, which we've already seen by the commitments made by the British government to continue to pay the equivalent EU grants after membership ends.

IMO, yes there is going to be a couple of years where things are a little uncertain, but Britain will come out the other side. A lot of the uncertainty right now is because no one really knows what the playing field will be after Brexit, now we have a fair idea business and government can now start to get on with the task of building on the foundations of what will be on 29th March.

Just to add, Brexit has polarised everyone, which is completely understandable, but one thing everyone should be able to agree is that you should either be in, or out... one foot in and one foot out is not in the interest of Britain long term, the damage that could cause to Britain is a much bigger risk than completely out. It would be like having someone who doesn't know how to watersky tied to a speedboat, not a pretty sight.
I agree with a lot of that but I don't agree on moving low skilled jobs eastwards for lower wages is fine. I wouldn't say my job was low skilled but it was still moved elsewhere. What I am hearing now especially from eastern Europeans is that while there are more jobs created there, prices have gone up so much while wages have stagnated, therefore they still seek work in countries like NL. Its economic migration, I have hundreds of real examples. The final destination for a lot has always been the UK but salaries are way behind those in western Europe. Those that will soon lose the 30% tax rule here are now looking to Dubai, its all about money.

As no deal seems most likely outcome now, I would say that those companies that are still in the UK by april, will remain in the UK. That's my personal opinion not a factual one.
 
Can you really deny that Brexit won't cause even more job flight?
I don't deny that there may be job flight but I have no historical data to back that up. As I mentioned in my previous post, companies are still there despite it becoming more likely that there wont be a deal, whats keeping them there? Is it likely that on 1st April they will move on mass? I'm not sure. If any of these companies move to western Europe they will find their salary bill going up by 3 fold, is that attractive?
 
I agree with a lot of that but I don't agree on moving low skilled jobs eastwards for lower wages is fine. I wouldn't say my job was low skilled but it was still moved elsewhere. What I am hearing now especially from eastern Europeans is that while there are more jobs created there, prices have gone up so much while wages have stagnated, therefore they still seek work in countries like NL. Its economic migration, I have hundreds of real examples. The final destination for a lot has always been the UK but salaries are way behind those in western Europe. Those that will soon lose the 30% tax rule here are now looking to Dubai, its all about money.

As no deal seems most likely outcome now, I would say that those companies that are still in the UK by april, will remain in the UK. That's my personal opinion not a factual one.

Good luck to them, Dubai now offers nowhere near the opportunities that it did in the early 2000s.
 
I'm not saying you're wrong but I don't get how they would lose access. How much would tariffs be? What sort of percentage would costs increase by because of customs and so on? I can see it would be more difficult, just asking how much more difficult.
It depends what we're talking about.

Insurance companies and banks could lost access entirely. Agriculture companies could face fees of ~10% whilst tariffs from the commonwealth are cut (although the stated aim of JRM and his ilk is a no tariff UK).

Legal services could lose access. High tech firms could face red tape moving their workers from the UK.

It's no one thing, just a bunch of small stabs
 
It depends what we're talking about.

Insurance companies and banks could lost access entirely. Agriculture companies could face fees of ~10% whilst tariffs from the commonwealth are cut (although the stated aim of JRM and his ilk is a no tariff UK).

Legal services could lose access. High tech firms could face red tape moving their workers from the UK.

It's no one thing, just a bunch of small stabs
I get the financial side, not as in understanding it but as in believing it's a problem. They would have to have subsidiaries based in the UK I presume. They'd still have the EU though, and have less competition there with the UK out of it maybe. I'm out of my depth on banking however, I must admit.
 
Seen this on Facebook. What a dumbass thing, considering multiple countries in Europe worked together for it.

37349379_10155714643006623_4962931321522356224_n.jpg
 
Seen this on Facebook. What a dumbass thing, considering multiple countries in Europe worked together for it.

37349379_10155714643006623_4962931321522356224_n.jpg

So being hammered at home or at the colonies up until the US/Russia bailed us out is freeing Europe? Never thought of that. My grandparents lived in the most bombarded part of the British empire and they never felt like saviours. It was more like survivors.
 
So being hammered at home or at the colonies up until the US/Russia bailed us out is freeing Europe? Never thought of that. My grandparents lived in the most bombarded part of the British empire and they never felt like saviours. It was more like survivors.

Not sure bailed out is the right phrase but yeah, it was a coming together of nations that ultimately won it, which makes it such a dumbass thing to post!
 
Not sure bailed out is the right phrase but yeah, it was a coming together of nations that ultimately won it, which makes it such a dumbass thing to post!

It was a bailing out. Before Dunkirk Hitler could have wiped the entire British army away. Then things got more complicated but Nazi Germany could have invaded the UK or at least isolate it and pick up the pieces (Malta, North Africa etc) if it wanted. Luckily for us, the madman was also a huge idiot. Rather then consolidate his power, he decided to invade Russia which was basically suicide. Then his Japanese mate did the same with the US and it was basically over. Even good old Bismarck knew that Germany can never win a war where its forced to fight on two fronts and he wasn't thinking of two superpowers (Russia and US) + the British empire.

Returning to the subject, the EU is the result of the war, an attempt to keep nationalism at bay through prosperity and common rules. That's why the likes of Orban, Farage, Salvini, Le Pen and the Tory Party hates it.
 
Last edited: