oh shit now that you said itI thought you meant the political party for a moment there and was struggling to see what was so offensive about his post.
oh shit now that you said itI thought you meant the political party for a moment there and was struggling to see what was so offensive about his post.
None. It is in the interest of of a united EU that we don't benefit from leaving.
Banks and Wigmore getting grilled now. Apparently Wigmore immediately asked the committee chair to recuse because he accepted Chelsea tickets once. Response: “Nice try, Mr Wigmore’.
This is going to be a clown car performance.
What the feck has this got to do with Leave.EU? Oh... right.
Leave.EU co-founder Aaron Banks:
OK so here we go:
westmonster.com whois lookup:
ADMINISTRATIVE CONTACT
Name:
Domains Administrator
Organization:
Eldon Insurance Services Limited
Street:
Lysander House Catbrain Lane, Cribbs Causeway
City:
Bristol
State:
South Gloucestershire
Postal Code:
BS10 7TQ
Country:
GB
Phone:
+44.8449029778
Email:
@eldoninsurance.co.uk
Eldon Insurance Services Founder: Arron Banks
In November 2017, the Electoral Commission announced that it is investigating whether election rules were broken during the EU referendum, in donations worth a total of £8.4 million to Leave.EU campaigners made by Banks and by Better for the Country Ltd, a company of which Banks is a registered director.
Is it a trustworthy source?
feck no
Here's where it get's even more juicy.....
https://www.opendemocracy.net/uk/brexitinc/adam-ramsay/how-did-arron-banks-afford-brexitShortly afterwards, Banks met the woman who was to become his second wife, a Portsmouth-based Russian called Ekaterina Paderina. According to the Sunday Times, Paderina’s former husband had been interviewed twice by Special Branch because they suspected her of working for the Russian government.
EDIT - More on Ekaterina Paderina, an article from 2010:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/po...l-Democrat-MP-helped-second-Russian-girl.html
Yeah. We've reach squeaky bum time after spending two years faffing about. I still think a deal will happen, somehow. I work for a French investment bank and in a meeting not long ago. Our head of operations was convinced CU/SM deal would happen. Don't know if it was his opinion or he knows something we don't. Seems other banks to are convinced that's what will happen.
I agree. You can't allow leaving to be perceived as being beneficial.EU's preferences of outcome surely has to be.
1) UK ends up staying in EU after all
2) It crashes out and suffers terribly acting as an ever-lasting disincentive for anyone else thinking of following their lead.
Never understood how people were convinced the EU were willing to make leaving at all an attractive proposition. Even if it does damage the remaining 27 economically, it's likely to be considered a hit worth taking in the long run and in any even collectively they'll be impacted a lot less than we will, proportionally.
I agree. You can't allow leaving to be perceived as being beneficial.
How is it a cult or dictatorship if every member state get's a vote. Blame the UK that one state can veto the agreement though.Well that just makes it sound like a cult or a dictatorship, this is what North Korea does.
I agree. You can't allow leaving to be perceived as being beneficial.
It's not a dictatorship. It's called common sense due to self-preservation.Well that just makes it sound like a cult or a dictatorship, this is what North Korea does.
That's what I mean. They want free trade without free movement or answering to the European Courts on Human Rights.Its allowed to be beneficial, honestly I think most EU countries would like it to be. We're linked regardless and your economy going down the toilet wont help anyone.
Your not allowed gain the benefits of membership without the costs, which is just obvious really.
It's not a dictatorship. It's called common sense due to self-preservation.
Which MP do you guys hate most?
Mine has to be Dorries. Every time I see her, I ask who voted for this muppet?
I like Abbott. She's not the sharpest tool in the box but doesn't pretend to be and by all accounts, is an excellent MP.Oh God, so many. Jacob Rees-Mogg, Kate Howey, John Redwood, Peter Bone, Boris Johnson...
I like Abbott. She's not the sharpest tool in the box but doesn't pretend to be and by all accounts, is an excellent MP.
The rest are cnuts. Redwood is a fecking condescending mf. Boris and Mogg are clowns.
It won't but it can't be seen to be given us special treatment. It actually can't legally give us special treatment. The UK has no choice but to accept what's on the table or leave. So actually, we'd be the ones ostracising the EU.I just meant how it sounded rather than what it is, in any case I don't think the EU is punishing the UK as such, it was just the circumstances and laws in place mean the UK has suffered/will suffer because of it. Furthermore, it wouldn't benefit the EU to ostracise the UK completely.
Exactly - but Brexiters havent figured this out.I agree. You can't allow leaving to be perceived as being beneficial.
That's what I mean. They want free trade without free movement or answering to the European Courts on Human Rights.
I want free trade, free movement and the ECHR.
These idiots took weak and wobbly at her word .
These idiots took weak and wobbly at her word .
I don't get this talk that if we don't have a definitive, cast-iron leave date that there's no incentive for the 27 to give us a good deal. What incentive is there for them to do that anyway?
Johnson, Gove, Rees-Mogg, Davis, Hooey, take your pick...Which MP do you guys hate most?
Mine has to be Dorries. Every time I see her, I ask who voted for this muppet?
My problem with Abbott is partially superficial. The way she talks when answering a question as if everyone is hearing the English language for the very first time is super irritating.
I don't get how so many people have decided that parliament having the right to reject an agreed deal makes soft brexit a certainty. At no point will the EU be negotiating in some sort of back and forth manner with parliament, it will be negotiating with government. If a resulting agreement is then rejected by parliament all that will be left is hard brexit. There seems to be some weird belief that the EU will keep offering new terms until parliament is happy with them, and that there's no timescale involved.
How May is supposed to handle this I've no idea either, but I do suspect that the next thing May puts to Brussels will be thrown straight back at her anyway, and all the balls will be up in the air again soon enough.
The whole point of being a member is for the benefits. When you leave, you lose the benefits. The perception that this a strategy by the EU... well it has a small amount of truth, but the larger truth is founded in the reality of the benefits the EU is there to provide for its members.Well that just makes it sound like a cult or a dictatorship, this is what North Korea does.
The whole point of being a member is for the benefits. When you leave, you lose the benefits. The perception that this a strategy by the EU... well it has a small amount of truth, but the larger truth is founded in the reality of the benefits the EU is there to provide for its members.
Ultimately the EU does actually have a lot more muscle than the UK.
State of the SNP.
No power. Exactly. ‘England’s’ Parliament doesn’t give a feck about Scotland’s voice and it’s exactly why the impact on devolution was swept under the carpet yesterday too.