Brexited | the worst threads live the longest

Do you think there will be a Deal or No Deal?


  • Total voters
    194
  • Poll closed .
Also tired of hearing "Corbyn is in a difficult situation".
It's a lame excuse for giving almost no direction on Brexit.
 
It really shouldn't just be journalists and back-bench MPs/rebels saying this though, should it?

Official line of both front benches still remains that Brexit must happen. Point that out and those on the right accuse you of being anti-democratic and a 'Remoaner', and people from the left accuse you of smearing Corbyn, as if pointing out his actual policy is a smear.

It's completely nuts. We're presented with a choice between a party that supports hard Brexit and an opposition who doesn't want to do anything to stop hard Brexit. Forget inner-party dissidents , that's literally the position we're in.


inclined to agree

the overall Westminster perspective seems like it's all a bit of a lark to me

except for the Tory loonies who are loving it - the tail wagging the dog feckwits

and Labour position is a pretty can't really be arsed shameful-fest for the most part, unless they can throw some mud that won't boomerang back
 


Of course they haven't. Davis, May, Fox, Johnson...they're all just playing a game of seeing how long they can get away with it.

Johnson will quit shortly before everything goes south in order to position himself as the white knight, the others will simply slink off. It's just a massive pretence to elongate their political relevance. Like the spoon-faced cnut before them, they'll simply walk off after setting the country alight and leave it for someone else.
 


The left's opposition to Brexit is because one conception involves us basically maintaining the same relationship without any of the benefits, and the other involves violating the Good Friday Agreement and severely damaging the economy, both options being implemented by a highly incompetent government who don't seem to understand any of this.
 
The left's opposition to Brexit is because one conception involves us basically maintaining the same relationship without any of the benefits, and the other involves violating the Good Friday Agreement and severely damaging the economy, both options being implemented by a highly incompetent government who don't seem to understand any of this.
Yeah I have mix feelings on the article and it of course the misses the biggest issue - the potential border in the North but I thought it was worth posting.
 
Yeah I have mix feelings on the article and it of course the misses the biggest issue - the potential border in the North but I thought it was worth posting.

Yeah, I don't mean to come across as an overly dismissive dick - I do have a certain respect for elements of the left who want to actually look for viable, workable solutions to this without undermining what the majority voted for, but at the same time I feel like a lot of the complicated discussion kind of misses the central point that opposition to Brexit is based on the fact that the end results are either pointless, non-viable or both.
 
Any chances press can call him out on this one, given his recent tweets?

I can't imagine him taking much notice of the Guardian and Independent. Other than that it'll be brushed under the carpet, Kusenberg will hold the rug up for him.
 
inclined to agree

the overall Westminster perspective seems like it's all a bit of a lark to me

except for the Tory loonies who are loving it - the tail wagging the dog feckwits

and Labour position is a pretty can't really be arsed shameful-fest for the most part, unless they can throw some mud that won't boomerang back
This. The Tory party has succumbed to the base instincts of its nasty wing and Labour is a cynical, deceitful rabble.

This should be the Lib Dems' chance to shine but they don't have anyone who can take advantage.
 
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2018/jan/21/adulthood-extended-adolescence-when-will-we-grow-uo
This says you're not adult until 24, although I'm pretty sure I've seen recent research somewhere that says it's 28 for males. I must admit when I read the caf I find it best to ignore posters under 28 anyway.

Yeah, I was pretty much an idiot until late in my 20s. Would have no problem making 28 the cut off point.

Bound to be some sort of bell-shaped curve, mind you. My old man has definitely got more and more reactionary and less logical since he hit his 70s.
 
It's not all down to age.
Someone who was stupid when they were 20 will still be stupid when they're 40 and at 60 and at 80.
Instead of taking into account their age or their political belief, make them take an intelligence test before they answer, that may be more revealing.
 
Intelligence tests before being allowed to vote are clearly a slippery slope.

That said, I’d be all in favour of insisting that voters pass a short MCQ test to onfirm that they understand what the feck they are voting for.

“Brexit, innit?” would not be an allowable answer.
 
Intelligence tests before being allowed to vote are clearly a slippery slope.

That said, I’d be all in favour of insisting that voters pass a short MCQ test to onfirm that they understand what the feck they are voting for.

“Brexit, innit?” would not be an allowable answer.

I wasn't talking about the right to vote, I was talking about the opinion polls, notably the one you posted, everyone has the right to vote.
 
That said, I’d be all in favour of insisting that voters pass a short MCQ test to onfirm that they understand what the feck they are voting for.

“Brexit, innit?” would not be an allowable answer.
What's wrong with "Brexit, innit?" It's a more explanatory sentence than what we actually got during the referendum.
 
Last edited:
Well I can't disagree with that but do not see the relevance.
qualifications are only worthwhile in narrow fields where the qualifications apply, they're worthless as measures in wider fields, i.e how the country should be run

intelligence tests don't even have narrow applications, they just show how well someone did in an arbitrary exam
 
I wasn't talking about the right to vote, I was talking about the opinion polls, notably the one you posted, everyone has the right to vote.

Aha. Well with polls I guess it’s just about trying to get a broad cross-section of society. I presume YouGov are fairly good at this. They’re one of the best known pollsters.
 
qualifications are only worthwhile in narrow fields where the qualifications apply, they're worthless as measures in wider fields, i.e how the country should be run

intelligence tests don't even have narrow applications, they just show how well someone did in an arbitrary exam

Agree qualifications in specific subjects will not serve to be useful in other areas of life but at least an intelligence test is a broader indication of a person's ability to use judgement, logic etc.
It may not be perfect but it's no less perfect than saying because someone is old he must be stupid and because someone is young he must be clever.