Classical Mechanic
Full Member
Blair is apparently working on reversing the process. I still don't think it'll go ahead.
He ain't that good.
Blair is apparently working on reversing the process. I still don't think it'll go ahead.
If that fecking cnut had anything approaching self-awareness, he'd have come out and said Brexit was a great idea from the very start.Blair is apparently working on reversing the process. I still don't think it'll go ahead.
They were DUPed
Blair is apparently working on reversing the process. I still don't think it'll go ahead.
The whole country is headed for soft Brexit.
The Farages and co simply have to accept it.
Which begs the question...why the feck are we leaving in the first place?
It's the sensible compromise (following the will of the people without crippling the nation) that leaves noone with what they want.
Everyone who wants to be in the single market/customs union etc would rather remain in the EU. The hardcore leavers won't accept any of the compromises that come with access to free trading. Freedom of movement, EU regulation and jurisdiction of EU courts- basically its like being a member without having a seat at the table.
well putSwapping a slightly stroppy marriage for a messy divorce that involves paying to get fecked up the arse by the EU while having to wear a gimp mask. Negotiations continue over what the safe word should be.
well put
Goes to show the state of NI politics when a party who received 28 percent of votes in the last election can torpedo a deal that the rest of the UK are begging for.
They lost the majority in Stormont 9 months ago, they have 1 more seat that Sinn Fein.
1,000 votes split the main parties from the 800,000 ballots cast in the closest ever assembly election
Its beyond ridiculous
What a joy it would be if they could be fecked off to some place else, to be governed by Farage, Johnson, Gove and the rest of the lying shitstains on British politics.
He's certainly a man who knows about campaigns of misinformation and lies, given his dodgy dossier.Blair is apparently working on reversing the process. I still don't think it'll go ahead.
90% of inward immigration goes to England which is the most densely populated country in Europe (except the island of Malta) and more densely populated than India. If the Tories do not deliver then the party will be hammered creating a big vacuum on the patriotic right.
90% of inward immigration goes to England which is the most densely populated country in Europe (except the island of Malta) and more densely populated than India. If the Tories do not deliver then the party will be hammered creating a big vacuum on the patriotic right.
I would hazard a guess that some of the most densely populated areas voted Remain (like London) whilst some of the least debsely populated vote Leave.90% of inward immigration goes to England which is the most densely populated country in Europe (except the island of Malta) and more densely populated than India. If the Tories do not deliver then the party will be hammered creating a big vacuum on the patriotic right.
Why does it matter if we're the most dense comparatively? Such a pointless soundbite
I would hazard a guess that some of the most densely populated areas voted Remain (like London) whilst some of the least debsely populated vote Leave.
So according to Davis "allignment" is totally different to "harmonisation", even though the end result has to be the same? Meanwhile the Irish government says they are in fact exactly the same as far as they're concerened.
Well thats a certainty at least.It's turned into a debate on semantics. I suspect Davis thinks that if they word it slightly differently the DUP will get confused and cave in.
If that's your view, then what is the alternative Brexit process that you would accept, that you think was offered/ publicised during the campaign
@Nick 0208 Ldn do you think this "regulatory alignment" for the UK is a betrayal of the vote?
The only thing that we voted for was in or out. What that means is totally in the hands of the Government and our friends still in The EU. All these people saying that's not what I voted for need to go back and see what was written on the ballot paper.@Nick 0208 Ldn do you think this "regulatory alignment" for the UK is a betrayal of the vote?
What i believed to be the effective Leave offer is consistent with and respectful of the EU's belief structure. Simply put, the UK ceasesto be a member of both the Single Market and the Customs Union. No mandated primacy of the ECJ nor guaranteed FoM). There was, however, scope to continue some level of annual contribution (for access to services and in support of programs we might still participate in).
While it won't happen with ths present government i do also expect significant reductions to the expense of visas for all entrants. We could also waive citizenship costs outright for those working in certain sectors. Recipricol arrangements for even lower barriers of movement could be reached with a smaller number of nations, places sucha s: US, Canada, Japan, Australia, New Zealand, South Korea... I'll have a word with Liam and see what he thinks.
There has never been a practicable 'soft Brexit', only continued EU membership in all but name. Remain would have won the referendum without actually doing so. The suggetion that this would pleases nobody is very disingenuous, and knowingly so i imagine.
I agree, you should take this up with Nick.The only thing that we voted for was in or out. What that means is totally in the hands of the Government and our friends still in The EU. All these people saying that's not what I voted for need to go back and see what was written on the ballot paper.
Brexit means what ever we end up getting and it's probably going to be worse than what we had.
What about changes to the Law?Antyhing UK-wide would have to be quite limited in nature for it not ot be. Taxation is a definite no-go for instance.
See that's been the problem with the Leave vote, it's all completely subjective and there was no coherent view or plan. It was all down to what the person believed.
That sounds wrong. I'd imagine both the Netherlands and Belgium have higher population densities.England which is the most densely populated country in Europe (except the island of Malta)
Lots of "red lines" thoughA lot of the things they believed were outright lies and can't be delivered upon.
Your kind of having terms dictated to you because you've failed to propose a single realistic, coherent plan to deal with any of these issues.
That sounds wrong. I'd imagine both the Netherlands and Belgium have higher population densities.
England on its own has a higher density than those two.That sounds wrong. I'd imagine both the Netherlands and Belgium have higher population densities.
England on its own has a higher density than those two.
So yeah, it is, If you don't count Monaco.
England on its own has a higher density than those two.
So yeah, it is, If you don't count Monaco.