Raulduke
Full Member
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2009
- Messages
- 2,572
1) I didn't say you have, just you've have made crass remarks about being 'stupid', 'anyone with intelligence', etc. these are childish jibes that add nothing to your argument but are simply intended to incite or upset, which from my experience when someone resorts to this they are losing the argument. I have to admit at times I've returned the favour in-kind, 'spec savers' comments etc. but I am just suggesting we desist from such language.
2) You've never said that, as far as I recall, its simply you refuse to except that the law makers in the UK Parliament are elected, where as law makers in the EU Commission are not. If that is not the case and you do now accept the difference, then is the time to clarify!
3) Again as far as I can recall you never said this,
That's funny just a few post ago you were claiming something different!
My guess is that it will back tracked on once the DUP start kicking up a fuss.Pretty good news that, but i'll only believe it when I see the receipts. I expect the DUP will kick up a stink
My guess is that it will back tracked on once the DUP start kicking up a fuss.
My question too.Forgive my ignorance but what is this likely to mean for May's government? Surely under these terms the DUP will pull out as threatened and she'll lose her majority?
Thank you yes, you are on more solid ground here (in my view) for arguing levels of relative democracy between systems and about dismissal; Commissioners will change (although still unelected by the general populace of the EU) and its still (in my view), in many cases 'jobs for the boys' when Commissioners are nominated by heads of state, but as for Senior Civil Servants in the UK, I'm not even sure are they ever dismissed? As its inferred in terms of jobs for life, "they die with their boots on"
Pretty good news that, but i'll only believe it when I see the receipts. I expect the DUP will kick up a stink
You cant put a price on freedomI wonder what price exactly the most ardent Brexiteers are willing to pay in order to leave the EU.
Rate vs Actual numbersSorry to burst your bubble. Poverty initially rose sharply after the financial crisis, but then fell year on year under Obama.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/200463/us-poverty-rate-since-1990/
Rate vs Actual numbers
"And even though the rate of poverty went down under Obama, the number of people in poverty rose — just not as fast as the population in general. In 2016, just over 40.6 million Americans were still living below the poverty line, an increase of 787,000 people compared with 2008. Under George W. Bush, the number went up by more than 8 million, after going down by more than 6 million under Clinton"
wrap it up how you like, makes no diffSo it fell in real terms then. If the rate increase slower than the population increased, then that's a fall realistically.
shambles
Reminder that NI voted to remain
Country being held to ransom by nutters funded by Theresa May
wrap it up how you like, makes no diff
Arlene Foster is a weapon and the DUP are total nutters. The Tories are absolute fools for ever getting into bed with them. They'll regret it now.
The DUP fecking love the idea of an NI totally segregated from Ireland! Keeping NI in the customs union is the worst possible scenario for them.DUP: We want no further divisions between NI and Eire
Also DUP: Let's campaign for Brexit
The amount of stupidity in politics at the moment is astonishing
Now London wants in as well
Now London wants in as well
The logic will be that NI is the only part of the country sharing a border with the EU, I would guess.The domino effect, she surely can’t pick and choose which parts of the UK to remain in the single market?
If she concedes NI, then she’ll have to concede for the whole country? And end up losing her parliamentary majority also.
The logic will be that NI is the only part of the country sharing a border with the EU, I would guess.
This is clearly going towards a soft Brexit now anyway.