Brexited | the worst threads live the longest

Do you think there will be a Deal or No Deal?


  • Total voters
    194
  • Poll closed .
No, we didn't.

We closed down whole industries left the people who used to work in them and the communities which depended on them to rot. There was no either or choice, developing the financial service sector didn't mean ending manufacturing it's a false dichotomy and it is one of the reasons the UK voted Brexit by the way. Those areas were left without hope and cut off from the new opportunities and benefits of the growth in the well-paid service sectors.

None of which had anything to do with the EU if it did then why is France still struggling to deal with the power of its unions?


Not often Kentonio and I agree - but he's absoltely 101% correct here.

I survived the UK when Wilson let the unions run the country; likewise Callaghan.

More miraculously, I managed to survive when Heath and Thatcher screwed up the country for generations still to come.

Just really, really glad that I saw the light and left when I did - a man can only take so much.


Edited - Shit, thought it was Kentonio who said that....No wonder I'm surprised that I agreed with the statement.
 
The part you're skipping over is that in that same period (and in large part because of our membership) we reconstructed Britain from a failing manufacturing state into a hugely successful and rich service and financial industry led country. Over the last 10 years there has been a real slump in the conditions of a lot of working people thanks to respective governments taking the side of corporations and banks, but nothing today compares to the shitshow that was Britain in the 70's. Can you even imagine what the country would do today if the government announced that they could only have electricity for 3 days a week? Or if the streets were filled with huge mounds of rubbish because no-one was collecting it for weeks? Or if the dead weren't being buried because even the grave-diggers were on strike? Nothing today compares to that, but then again people's expectations are considerably higher today than they were then.

That's what pisses me off about the Leave arguments about the amount of money we put in, they never bother to mention the huge benefits including economic benefits that we've taken back as a result. The vast, vast majority of experts have told you that leaving would be a huge economic hit, so why aren't you listening to them?
Britain in the 70s Holland in the 60s & 80s, France has taken over as strike capital of the eurozone they just don't have a Thatcher to batter everyone into submission. Closing coalmines to import from Australia cos it was cheaper( another race to the bottom ), trickle down economics which worked for the few, neoliberal politics at its best. European politics has been putting the power with the banks and large corporations to this day yet you condemn it in your post.

People went on strike cos they had the right to and so they should. And as to your last couple of sentences, if people were feeling the benefits the ref would have a different result. The fact that very few benefit is thanks to the neoliberal way of euro politics which you so much adore. Less we talk about experts the better. I mean does anyone really care how the country is doing so long as they can provide for their family?? Probably yeas but first and foremost not.
 

LOL! This is an OJEC publication its the EU's own court of auditors report, the EU auditing themselves, my goodness they have dozens of these... where are the independent auditors report?
No wonder the EU's in a mess, when I worked for the EU (late 9o's to early 00's) I asked 12 times for independent auditors to audit a relatively low cost project, Brussels refused every time.
 
LOL! This is an OJEC publication its the EU's own court of auditors report, the EU auditing themselves, my goodness they have dozens of these... where are the independent auditors report?
No wonder the EU's in a mess, when I worked for the EU (late 9o's to early 00's) I asked 12 times for independent auditors to audit a relatively low cost project, Brussels refused every time.

So you're saying the European Court of Auditors is not independent and that their findings are in collusion with the EU to misrepresent the actual finances of the EU and it's the EU who's in a mess and not the UK and it's the EU that's going to disintegrate and not the UK economy
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-eu-referendum-36276175
https://fullfact.org/europe/did-auditors-sign-eu-budget/

Or something a bit like the National Audit Office or Public Accounts Committee in the UK
 
Last edited:
the police dealing with waves of EU criminals needing translators at £150 per call out as well as dealing with disaffected descendants of earlier waves of immigration, farmers having livestock stolen, churches having lead stolen from roofs and railway tracks stripped of wire and you can start to understand the rising tide of anger.

:lol: Because this is all done by EU immigrants is it? 80% of all unemployed in this country are UK nationals. But the 20% EU citizens are the ones committing all the crime.

Time to stop reading the Daily Express, bud.
 
Which page can I find the £1bn DUP bung in the Tory manifesto again?

Are you seriously defending the bung :lol:


The equivalent of a pin prick on a gnat's bollock compared to the £40 billion > £50 billion that Corbyn promised to give to students to vote Labour.

And then denied he'd actually promised to.....

But just as well that bribe didn't work, because Corbyn is whipping his MPs to vote against Brexit even though he privately supports it. Caroline Flint says MPs should rebel against the Labour whip. Thanks to Keir Starmer Labour officially want to stay in the single market during the transition, even though Corbynistas think the single market is a neoliberal tool of the bosses and want to leave it. Tom Watson says Labour could stay in the single market forever, yet John McDonnell says we have to leave it to respect the referendum result. Frontbenchers Jon Ashworth and Jenny Chapman say Watson is wrong, Heidi Alexander and Alison McGovern say he is right. Diane Abbott and Clive Lewis say Labour must support free movement, Corbyn and Starmer say free movement will end after Brexit. Barry Gardiner says staying in the customs union would be a “disaster“, yet Starmer says we should remain in “a” customs union during the transition. Watson says we could stay in indefinitely. Tony Blair says we should just stay in the EU but now says FoM needs to stop.

So I suppose £1 Billion to avoid Labour's very own self-imposed chaos is something of a bargain.
 

I mean, it's really nice of you to prove my point for me. But isn't it usual to try and link to something that backs up your viewpoint? (Not that you can, because you've made it up mind)

It's ironic you bring this up this week actually seeing as Theresa May is reportedly trying to win back young voters by altering the terms of student debt retroactively to ease the burden caused by interest payments.

But one rule for the Tories and one rule for everyone else right?
 
No he isn't you utter imbecile.

Though it was awfully nice of you to point out that you're clueless before the wall of text really got going.

I'm just imaging how long you could make a list of contradictory things various members of the Brexit team have said or done.

That's what I don't really understand about the current Brexit supporters posting here. If you're of the opinion that Brexit could be a good thing, then surely you should be absolutely seething with the completely clueless, bungling imbeciles in charge of it right now for fecking it up.
 
So where does it actually say what you've claimed you nightmare of a man :lol:
 
I think rcoobc probably know the difference between promising to end student loans going forward and writing off student debt.

Unfortunately you don't, but perhaps you should go and look it up before you continue to make a tit of yourself?


I never mentioned writing off student debt -

compared to the £40 billion > £50 billion that Corbyn promised to give to students to vote Labour.

And the difference is ??

Maybe you couldn't make it to Uni yourself so get easily confused if you have to think about something before answering.
 
Last edited:
I never mentioned writing off student debt -

compared to the £40 billion > £50 billion that Corbyn promised to give to students to vote Labour.

And the difference is ??
One was a manifesto policy. One was an after the fact bribe.
 
You're a tad confused I think.

Labour wrote a manifesto. A tax and spend manifesto. They were going to tax. And they were going to spend. The promised to privatise, they promised to fund public projects, and they promised to scrap tuition fees.

This was going to cost a lot. But their numbers more or less added up depending on how much people thought they would bring in from their increased tax rates.

Later, some people started claiming that Labour were promising to scrap the existing student debt. This wasn't a manifesto promise, although Corbyn did say he would look at it. Later, others criticised him for backtracking, forcing Corbyn to say "I never said we would abolish student debt" (your link)

No one is saying that Labour's policy wouldn't cost a lot. It would.

But saying "there is no magic money tree" and then finding £1bn to pay a bribe is something else.

theresas-magic-money-tree.jpg
 
You're a tad confused I think.

Labour wrote a manifesto. A tax and spend manifesto. They were going to tax. And they were going to spend. The promised to privatise, they promised to fund public projects, and they promised to scrap tuition fees.

This was going to cost a lot. But their numbers more or less added up depending on how much people thought they would bring in from their increased tax rates.

Later, some people started claiming that Labour were promising to scrap the existing student debt. This wasn't a manifesto promise, although Corbyn did say he would look at it. Later, others criticised him for backtracking, forcing Corbyn to say "I never said we would abolish student debt" (your link)

No one is saying that Labour's policy wouldn't cost a lot. It would.

But saying "there is no magic money tree" and then finding £1bn to pay a bribe is something else.

theresas-magic-money-tree.jpg



No....Not confused....

The Tories paid out a €1 billion bribe to stay in power.

Labour wanted to pay out a €40 billion bribe to get into power.
 
So what's wrong with the UK Government spending UK Taxpayers money on UK citizens ?

You're suggesting it would be more appropriate if they should have given it to Brussels to spend on building motorways in Lithuania or Spain?

What I like about EU spending is there is no votes to be won by it, so it goes where it's needed. The DUP got a billion but this will mean even more austerity for the rest of us
 
So what's wrong with the UK Government spending UK Taxpayers money on UK citizens ?

You're suggesting it would be more appropriate if they should have given it to Brussels to spend on building motorways in Lithuania or Spain ?




Blame Tony Bliar and Labour for that - bugger all to do with the the Conservatives.
Heh, your country is gonna lose a hell of a lot more money per billion by leaving the EU than by staying in and paying for those "motorways".

At least the NHS will be thriving with all that money going to .. oh wait.
 
In latest shock news: Politician lies in order to obtain power!!

Quite, and Corbyn is guilty of that too, but in this instance he's getting flak from people who like to portray young people as thick because because they imagine he said something that he didn't, imagine other people made the same mistake they did, and are imaging he's denying saying something he did rather than the statement that he didn't

Certain irony there...
 
I'd answer you all, but...

I'm off to earn some unexpected money, ironically, courtesy of the EU and need to get the paperwork sorted pronto.

40 metric tonnes of fresh cut flowers and Mange-tout peas from Kenya can't go directly from Kenya to the UK because EU Tarrifs would make them more ( too ? ) expensive in the supermarkets.

Solution ?

We're taking them to Turkey, where the paperwork will be ' adjusted ' by an allegedly reputable import/export company to make Turkey their country of origin and then we'll take them on to the UK on behalf of the ( now ) Turkish owners because they can then enter the UK Tariff free.

And don't think this doesn't happen with thousands of shipments out of Africa every night - just that tonight we have space on an aircraft that was originally going to the UK anyway, so all a bit of an unexpected bonus for us.

So I'll leave you guys to have a circle jerk around the EU flag and hopefully see you all again tomorrow for another load of bollocks.