Smores
Full Member
- Joined
- May 18, 2011
- Messages
- 26,562
I've blagged important meetings better than she's doing here and she's had months.
Some months back, we were hosting a conference on fighting tax-avaidance. Now, we want to become a tax haven.
Plus there's basically a (corporate) tax haven right beside them that is in the EU.Such a blatant sabre-rattle. It's an empty threat too. There's a reason tax havens are usually in the middle of fecking nowhere. No major business will want to relocate to the UK for tax breaks, in the knowledge that the marketplace of 500 million people right beside the UK will do everything in its power to punish them for that decision.
Plus there's basically a (corporate) tax haven right beside them that is in the EU.
take back control.. maybe, kinda."might try" "some sort"
What a plan!
Such a blatant sabre-rattle. It's an empty threat too. There's a reason tax havens are usually in the middle of fecking nowhere. No major business will want to relocate to the UK for tax breaks, in the knowledge that the marketplace of 500 million people right beside the UK will do everything in its power to punish them for that decision.
depends if I interpret you waving goodbye as a slapNo. But if I slapped you in the face and then asked you to give me a tenner you'd be less inclined to give it to me than if I wasn't being a dick to you.
It's not that, the Remain camp want the UK to do well, but every time someone from the government say something another nail goes into the coffin of the UK
depends if I interpret you waving goodbye as a slap
Good, make the most of life outside the eu then
who knows, you want it to work out. Or did you mean you wanted the best for the uk by staying in the sigle market? which wasn't on the tableAnd how will they do that, seems like May wants to lose the main thing the UK cherishes, which is the City and services sector
No deal is better than a bad deal ? We'll walk out of the talks ? So, is no plan better than a bad plan ? Is it better not even to walk into the talks ? Maintain the current Irish border arrangement ? So, could people fly into Dublín, take the train to Belfast and a ferry to England ?
who knows, you want it to work out. Or did you mean you wanted the best for the uk by staying in the sigle market? which wasn't on the table
How will the EU respond to that and when ?
It is bull. The biggest impact on services is austerity and don't let anyone convince you otherwise.I have no problems with the idea that a population influx puts pressure on services, which is why Labour created the Migration Impact Fund, miserably low though it was. But why did the Tories get rid of it all together instead of increasing it to cope with the deficiencies ?
I'm not saying it's the biggest or the only impact, only that it is one. If you have 5 doctors for 200 people, then it goes up to 1000 people, there's an impact. The answer is more funding, not less. But also people were able to blame immigration for things they could see happening.He speech was full of ifs, but, hopefully, maybe
It is bull. The biggest impact on services is austerity and don't let anyone convince you otherwise.
Have you picked that number out randomly ? Last time I checked all immigration total to around 9% of the population.I'm not saying it's the biggest or the only impact, only that it is one. If you have 5 doctors for 200 people, then it goes up to 1000 people, there's an impact. The answer is more funding, not less. But also people were able to blame immigration for things they could see happening.
Polly Toynbee: This looks like war
Call it clean, call it hard, but May’s red, white and blue Brexit threatens epic self-harm – out of the single market, out of the customs union, no half-in, half-out. Immigration she has put above all else, regardless of livelihoods and despite polls showing that Brexit voters would not want border control to cost them dearly.
Enoch Powell from the grave has finally won – Brexiteer leaders are his direct inheritors. Where other Conservative leaders always saw off their little-Englander, closed-border right flank, she is the first to cave in.
How she has sugared that hard truth in fantasy visions of her “stronger, fairer, more global Britain”, as if this “great global trading nation” with its gigantic trade deficit still ruled the imperial waves. Cake-and-eat-it delusions infused all she said: Irish border? We’ll sort it, God knows how. Get all the trade we want for every key sector – no problem, and no contributions either. They need us more than we need them, she boasts. If they try punishment, here’s her fist – a cut-throat tax haven race to the bottom, “our freedom to set a competitive tax rate”. How disgraceful too to use our intelligence capability as a deeply damaging added threat.
More from the realms of fantasy: time and again she claimed the country was united or coming together, at least, when it has never been more sorely split, emotionally, politically, regionally, generationally. Nor was there any comfort for EU nationals here and thus none for UK nationals over there. Had she meant her words of keeping the partnership with old EU allies, that one small gesture of true friendship would have opened her negotiations in a genuine spirit of amity. Instead, this looks like war.
How we going to do that then?I've just finished watching it in full and found it to be a good speech, certainly more forthright than i expected. Called bulls**t on the shame of a 'soft Brexit', and essentially told the EU that we'll respond in kind if they intend to make this more ugly than it needs to be.
Stop defending them with our soldiers, nukes and spies, basically.How we going to do that then?
I've just finished watching it in full and found it to be a good speech, certainly more forthright than i expected. Called bulls**t on the shame of a 'soft Brexit', and essentially told the EU that we'll respond in kind if they intend to make this more ugly than it needs to be.
How we going to do that then?
Stop defending them with our soldiers, nukes and spies, basically.
We're a global trading nation. We are outward looking. So yeah, I think in that case we would be OK because we would have loads of opportunities in India and China. No problem.How will it affect the EU citizens who are working over here? If the banks go elsewhere and then decide not to take their British workers with them, what then?
How will it affect the EU citizens who are working over here? If the banks go elsewhere and then decide not to take their British workers with them, what then?
How will it affect the EU citizens who are working over here? If the banks go elsewhere and then decide not to take their British workers with them, what then?