I said I loathe (English) nationalism, not people. And, on the basis of logical consistency, I find it hard to celebrate Scottish nationalism, even if I understand their frustration with the current constitutional set up. Nationalism is simplified history based on stuff invented or at least imaginatively recreated in the 19th century after the French revolution introduced this toxin into the political bloodstream. So, while in an English context it’s dressed up in Royalist flummery as we win every battle by ignoring the ones we lost, in Scotland it’s “Alba” and kilts (probably to suck up to Americans in a Mel Gibson Braveheart way) while ignoring lowland Scots speaking a dialect of English purer than modern English and the Norse heritage of the islands and Sutherland and Caithness. Scotland could stand on its own but, in a practical sense, separating England and Scotland (after 300 years) will make the UK’s separation from the EU (after 45 years) look relatively pain free, and, in a broader sense, it’s desperate failure of statecraft if we can’t share this island without dividing it up with borders. The answer - a federal UK (or GB at least) within the EU. Not likely to happen unfortunately.