Brexited | the worst threads live the longest

Do you think there will be a Deal or No Deal?


  • Total voters
    194
  • Poll closed .
You've highlighted the problem with Corbyn's approach/potential deal but you can apply the same deductive reasoning to absolutely anyone's approach. 17.4m voted for Brexit and there is hundreds of different interpretation/expectations. If you get a deal it will be considered too soft a Brexit by some and too hard by others and the other half of the country don't want a deal at all.

It's funny how Boris's position doesn't come under the same scrutiny.
I agree. Perhaps I should have included the point I made in earlier posts that any new referendum should give voters a range of choices, as that is my main point. Apart from obvioius fairness if people aren't given the chance to vote for something approximating to their wishes they will claim fix and rigging and we'll be back to square one, Farage and all, in a few year's time.
 
If you want to have a chance of severing all ties with the EU vote the Brexit party. *

If you want to have a chance to leave in a non damaging way vote Labour. *

If you want to have a chance at remaining vote Labour. *

If you want to have a chance at leaving with the current deal vote Conservative. *

If you don't really care what happens but want to feel like you did something anyway vote remain alliance Lib Dem, Plaid & Greens. *

If you're a racist cnut vote UKIP. *

If you're an idiot don't vote. *

* not you personally but the population in general.
'A chance of remaining'. With a clear powerful message like that what could possibly go wrong?
 
I agree. Perhaps I should have included the point I made in earlier posts that any new referendum should give voters a range of choices, as that is my main point. Apart from obvioius fairness if people aren't given the chance to vote for something approximating to their wishes they will claim fix and rigging and we'll be back to square one, Farage and all, in a few year's time.

Have you tried to plan a list of choices before? It's a shit show and the more you try to make it fair the less fair it becomes. If you start making it ranked choices and building decision trees it becomes an absolute mess.
 
'A chance of remaining'. With a clear powerful message like that what could possibly go wrong?

Its the best chance possible. If there's a better chance let's discuss it as long as you don't say Lib Dems because that's just plain stupid.
 
Does anyone, even Corbyn, know what this credible deal is? Are the EU likely to accept this credible deal, whatever it is? Can they do all of it in 3 months when it took May 3 years to get her deal on paper and Johnson 3 months to amend that deal a little bit?
 
So the people will have a choice between Labour's deal, which will include freedom of movement, and Remain, also with freedom of movement. Which is great for those that want freedom of movement, but those that do not won't exactly have a choice will they? Corbyn must be hoping there aren't too many of them around in five week's time, and Farage has been hiding under a rock somewhere I suppose. Glad his position's clear now anyway.

We can always implement restrictions on people from the EU who live here for more than 3 months without a job or proof of means, like we always had the option to but decided it wasn't worth our while.

If you aren't happy with that it says a lot about you.
 
If you want to have a chance of severing all ties with the EU vote the Brexit party. *

If you want to have a chance to leave in a non damaging way vote Labour. *

If you want to have a chance at remaining vote Labour. *

If you want to have a chance at leaving with the current deal vote Conservative. *

If you don't really care what happens but want to feel like you did something anyway vote remain alliance Lib Dem, Plaid & Greens. *

If you're a racist cnut vote UKIP. *

If you're an idiot don't vote. *

* not you personally but the population in general.

You are kidding, presumably.
 
If you want to have a chance of severing all ties with the EU vote the Brexit party. *

If you want to have a chance to leave in a non damaging way vote Labour. *

If you want to have a chance at remaining vote Labour. *

If you want to have a chance at leaving with the current deal vote Conservative. *

If you don't really care what happens but want to feel like you did something anyway vote remain alliance Lib Dem, Plaid & Greens. *

If you're a racist cnut vote UKIP. *

If you're an idiot don't vote. *

* not you personally but the population in general.
If you want to have a chance of remaining vote for the party who want to leave in a non damaging way (even though there apparently isn't a non damaging way)
Well that's cleared that up
 
We can always implement restrictions on people from the EU who live here for more than 3 months without a job or proof of means, like we always had the option to but decided it wasn't worth our while.

If you aren't happy with that it says a lot about you.
That could well be highlighted in a future remain campaign. It seems I have to be tiresome and say once again my point is that if there is another referendum people should have a range of choices to vote for, and not just a rigged two.
 
That could well be highlighted in a future remain campaign. It seems I have to be tiresome and say once again my point is that if there is another referendum people should have a range of choices to vote for, and not just a rigged two.

I guess that would be ok if there was alternative voting in place.
 
You are kidding, presumably.

Not in the slightest. Labour leave is BRINO. Least damaging, only downside no say in EU matters. People want trade just no political integration and BRINO is just that. Not the end of the world and a case to re-join down the line but I suspect we’d just remain.

Does anyone, even Corbyn, know what this credible deal is? Are the EU likely to accept this credible deal, whatever it is? Can they do all of it in 3 months when it took May 3 years to get her deal on paper and Johnson 3 months to amend that deal a little bit?

Yes, because Theresa May spent years laying down red lines and then just abolished them last minute to get a deal out of desperation. Johnson also spent months pissing about then decided last minute any deal will do. Worse than May.

Labour won’t go into negotiations doing that, they’ll want customs union at the very least and possibly even single market. They’ll go with the aim to do a deal from the first day and won’t spend it wasting time.


If you want to have a chance of remaining vote for the party who want to leave in a non damaging way (even though there apparently isn't a non damaging way)
Well that's cleared that up

You’re clearly not as smart as JRM otherwise it’s not that difficult to understand.
 
Not in the slightest. Labour leave is BRINO. Least damaging, only downside no say in EU matters. People want trade just no political integration and BRINO is just that. Not the end of the world and a case to re-join down the line but I suspect we’d just remain

.

What Labour proposed in 2017 was a long way from BRINO, it doesn't sound that much different to that at the moment, hopefully the manifesto will be a bit more clear.
But BRINO is not just trade it's ECJ, freedom of movement, payments, as was the EC and EU just no say.
 


Oh look, the Prime Minister has had a drink and is either outright lying (very likely) or literally still does not know key details about his own deal (also very likely).
 


Oh look, the Prime Minister has had a drink and is either outright lying (very likely) or literally still does not know key details about his own deal (also very likely).

Sadly I agree with whoever said about nothing seeming to cut through the noise in this infernal election.
 


The Labour Farty may answer a simple question very soon.

I'm no fan of the current labour party... But I think until the manifesto comes out it's unrealistic to think people will go off script and make announcements
Will be interesting to see if labour has costed in buying back the water firms
And especially how they have costed the impact of their brexit deal (assuming at least their red lines are in the manifesto)... And will they either reduce or delay spending plans or will they increase taxes
 
I'm no fan of the current labour party... But I think until the manifesto comes out it's unrealistic to think people will go off script and make announcements
Will be interesting to see if labour has costed in buying back the water firms
And especially how they have costed the impact of their brexit deal (assuming at least their red lines are in the manifesto)... And will they either reduce or delay spending plans or will they increase taxes

Looks as if FoM is not going to be in their plans so the fantasy BRINO scenario should finally die when they do announce it.
Nationalising everything will not fit into a remain scenario even if the country could afford it. Trying to please everyone should soon be over.
 
The European parliament’s Brexit coordinator, Guy Verhofstadt, has said he has “doubts” that a trade deal can be negotiated in under a year as claimed by the UK when “in other cases it takes five, seven or nine years”.

Speaking to the European parliament’s committee on constitutional affairs, Verhofstadt said:

I can confirm the doubts that I have that in one year you will do what you need.

For example, [it took] nine years with Canada. An FTA with Britain is even more complicated as the interests at stake are more important, the trade is more important with the UK.



But Superman Corbyn will not only negotiate a new withdrawal agreement but also a trade deal within the space of three months. Amazing.
 
The European parliament’s Brexit coordinator, Guy Verhofstadt, has said he has “doubts” that a trade deal can be negotiated in under a year as claimed by the UK when “in other cases it takes five, seven or nine years”.

Speaking to the European parliament’s committee on constitutional affairs, Verhofstadt said:

I can confirm the doubts that I have that in one year you will do what you need.

For example, [it took] nine years with Canada. An FTA with Britain is even more complicated as the interests at stake are more important, the trade is more important with the UK.



But Superman Corbyn will not only negotiate a new withdrawal agreement but also a trade deal within the space of three months. Amazing.

Not amazing at all, the length of time depends on how similar the ambitions of both sides are to what is already in place. Labour would want an arrangement as close as possible to single market membership, most probably the only sticking point being free movement of people but even then free movement, when all the right wing rhetoric on immigrants is removed, is a massive positive for the normal priorities of any sensible government (the economy, tax receipts, the NHS and pretty much everything else you care to think of except perhaps education) so they'd probably even get behind that eventually.
 
Not amazing at all, the length of time depends on how similar the ambitions of both sides are to what is already in place. Labour would want an arrangement as close as possible to single market membership, most probably the only sticking point being free movement of people but even then free movement, when all the right wing rhetoric on immigrants is removed, is a massive positive for the normal priorities of any sensible government (the economy, tax receipts, the NHS and pretty much everything else you care to think of except perhaps education) so they'd probably even get behind that eventually.

Yes , they want all the same benefits of the EU without complying with the rules, what they said in their 2017 manifesto - doesn't look as if that has changed but on top of that they expect a FTA - they are diversifying from the EU , not getting closer
The chance of this happening is between 0% and 0%. Can't wait for the manifesto.
 
Last edited:
EJIPj2CX0AAO52Q
 
Corbyn says he disagrees with Tusk's claim UK would be 'second-rate player' outside EU
In an interview this morning in Scotland Jeremy Corbyn said he rejected the claim from Donald Tusk, the outgoing European council president, that Britain will become a “second-rate player” if it leaves the EU. Asked if he agreed, he replied:

No I don’t think we are ever going to be a second-rate player.

This is a big country, an important country and trading partner and I look forward to leading a government that will be working with others around the world.

[Tusk] makes many statements at many times and he is the president of the EU and, yes, he can make those statements and I look forward to discussing them with him.

So the Labour remain myth dies and Corbyn doesn't realise Tusk will no longer be President from 1 December.
 
Corbyn says he disagrees with Tusk's claim UK would be 'second-rate player' outside EU
In an interview this morning in Scotland Jeremy Corbyn said he rejected the claim from Donald Tusk, the outgoing European council president, that Britain will become a “second-rate player” if it leaves the EU. Asked if he agreed, he replied:

No I don’t think we are ever going to be a second-rate player.

This is a big country, an important country and trading partner and I look forward to leading a government that will be working with others around the world.

[Tusk] makes many statements at many times and he is the president of the EU and, yes, he can make those statements and I look forward to discussing them with him.

So the Labour remain myth dies and Corbyn doesn't realise Tusk will no longer be President from 1 December.

To be fair he had to say basically exactly that, otherwise tomorrows headlines would have been "Commie Corbyn calls UK second-rate country!!"
 


I think this is where the tide turns. The people of this country will as much as allow you to ram them in the backside if the papers tell them so, but mess with their football and the pitchforks will be coming out.

RIP Brexit, RIP Conservatives :lol: