Stanley Road
Renaissance Man
Are you this pessimistic in real life Devlish?
Are you this pessimistic in real life Devlish?
Hard not to be pessemistic as Britex is a disaster. Not even one waiting to happened. And not just economically.
Technically yes, politically it would be much harder.Is it still possible to cancel the whole stupid thing?
Well my life has not changed at all so i have no need to feel glum about it. i will also try and.make the best of whatever comes of it and stay positive. there are worse things in life to get suicidal overHard not to be pessemistic as Britex is a disaster. Not even one waiting to happened. And not just economically.
Well my life has not changed at all so i have no need to feel glum about it. i will also try and.make the best of whatever comes of it and stay positive. there are worse things in life to get suicidal over
That's the spirit; I'm alright Jack.Well my life has not changed at all so i have no need to feel glum about it. i will also try and.make the best of whatever comes of it and stay positive. there are worse things in life to get suicidal over
Well i havent time to worry about something that is not affecting me, my family or my job yet. And if it ever does i will try and make it work in a positive way.That's the spirit; I'm alright Jack.
Well my life has not changed at all so i have no need to feel glum about it. i will also try and.make the best of whatever comes of it and stay positive. there are worse things in life to get suicidal over
no one is getting suicidal about anything mate. Certainly not me who can work anywhere, who come from a country with a ridiculously low unemployment rate and who hold an EU passport. There again, there's nothing wrong in discussing politics isn't it?
No and i am benefiting from the weak pound during trips homeYou don't even live in the UK
Course not but the discussion revolves around uk politics which was a mess before the vote. What about spain that cant form a govt and wide discontent in europe with the eu?
Well my life has not changed at all so i have no need to feel glum about it. i will also try and.make the best of whatever comes of it and stay positive. there are worse things in life to get suicidal over
The Brexit camp is keen on citing the example of Greenland, which voted to leave the E.U. in 1982, a few years after the country won home rule from Denmark. But even with a population of just 56,000 and an economy that is tiny in comparison to that of the United Kingdom, it took three straight years of negotiations for Greenland to realize its emancipation. If Article 50, the mechanism that formally triggers Britain’s exit, is invoked, the U.K. is somehow expected to complete the process in two years.
There is nothing to give us confidence that anyone in the U.K. government fully comprehends the reality of the situation. After all, the government minister in charge of Brexit, the aforementioned David Davis, only realized in the last few months that it would not be possible for the U.K. to forge individual trade deals with different E.U. member states. As an old debating partner of mine—we have shared many platforms on civil liberties—I hesitate to be too brutal about Davis’s failure to grasp that E.U. countries cannot make discrete trade deals. But, frankly, it beggars belief that he lived for so long under this illusion, and that these wildly optimistic fantasies weren’t challenged.
British Conservative politicians are habitually rather scathing about Scandinavian countries on account of their enlightened attitudes towards welfare and tax. But now they are all over Norway like a cheap suit, hoping that Britain can, like Norway, become a member of the European Free Trade Association, which allows a country to enjoy the benefits of the single market while not being a member of the European Union. Not unreasonably, Norway is raising objections. “It’s not certain that it would be a good idea to let a big country into this organization,” said the country’s European-affairs minister, Elizabeth Vik Aspaker. “It would shift the balance, which is not necessarily in Norway’s interests.”
The Brexit camp, as represented by The Spectator magazine, which proclaimed “Out—and into the World” when it endorsed the Leave campaign, seems to have absolutely no understanding of international trade or Britain’s dependency on Europe. For instance, the E.U. takes 39.4 percent of the U.K.’s service exports, which is more than the next nine trading partners—the U.S., Switzerland, Japan, China, Canada, Russia, India, Hong Kong, and Brazil—combined (38.4 percent). If Britain were to lose access to the single market, or British-based banks were stopped from trading freely in Europe through the “passporting” arrangements with the E.U., it would take very little to end the City of London’s reign as the de facto financial capital of Europe. In fact, Britain could pretty soon be broke on account the enormous tax revenue the City produces.
Thought this was a great article summing up some of problems that lies ahead for Britain after invoking Article 50.
http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2016/08/the-brexit-hangover-just-got-worse
Is it still possible to cancel the whole stupid thing?
in all fairness banks are closing left right and centre because everyone does it all online now, it shows as much of the challenging times as for brexit.12 hours later...
BOOMING!
It is odd how Bazza Brexit is still blissfully unaware of the damage his decision has caused. Must be wilful ignorance at this point.Polls show leave in the lead.
Theresa May tells feuding ministers to 'stop playing games' and get on with the job
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/201...uding-ministers-to-stop-playing-games-and-ge/
Theresa May tells feuding ministers to 'stop playing games' and get on with the job
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/201...uding-ministers-to-stop-playing-games-and-ge/
So, while we may be two months in, you might want to get used to the waiting. Brexit may not happen quite yet.
As well as the article 50 talks a raft of others must follow, including on Britain’s new trade deal with the EU, which could prove so complicated it requires an interim agreement to tide things over.
Then Britain’s full WTO membership must be re-established (which means drawing up a new set of national tariffs, a monumental task, and winning approval from 164 countries), and the 50-plus free trade agreements negotiated by the EU on its members’ behalf renegotiated.
Plus, as Charles Grant, of the Centre for European Reform, points out, new deals will be needed on European security, defence, the environment, science and research and, in all probability, Northern Ireland.
And that takes no account of the changes needed in UK domestic laws and regulations. Brexit, notes Dominic Cook of Oxford University’s Saïd Business School, is “the biggest transformational project a UK government has ever undertaken” not only because of foreign negotiations but “the inward-facing part: implementing and educating in the UK”.
Oh, look, now Jean Claude Juncker wants to remove borders in its entirety. These guys really just dont know when to stop, do they? Therese May wasn't to impressed the article says.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/201...k-after-jean-claude-juncker-claims-borders-a/
And whyBrexit means Brexit … but the big question is when?
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/aug/22/brexit-means-brexit-when-is-big-question
And why
And why
Juncker is wrong of course. There again its also unacceptable to the Western world to sell weapons to dictators or go bombing this or that country only to then hide behind borders to avoid getting overwhelmed with refugees. Its time the West take a bit of responsibility regarding wars it caused or encouraged in Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya. Not to forget the years of colonialism and grief in caused in Africa and beyond.
I also cant understand why Theresa May would react to what Juncker said. Wasn't the UK on its way out of the EU?
Juncker, a man no one even knew they were voting for, deciding something no one agrees with and no one knows how much weight his view carries. The EU summed up and people wonder why the UK voted to leave.
Juncker was voted by the MEPs and we vote for MEPs. This was the first British general elections I voted for. In my country voting is a big thing with turnouts of 93-94% so we take politics seriously. I can't recall being given the option to vote for Cameron, Miliband etc. There were five or six random dudes I've never even heard about (no May, Osborne, Farage, Gove etc) and I presume the conservative dude which I didn't voted for voted for their prime minister.Since I live in a fiercely conservative area and I hate tories with a passion my vote is worth less than toilet paper. I'll never be represented into parliament and the seat in my locality will always go to the conservatives. The system is so skewed that the third most voted party in the UK only ended up with just 1 seat. Sorry mate but this system is even worse than that that elected Juncker
Returning to war, who voted in Malta, Tunisia etc to have one of our neighbouring country into a little Somalia? Why should we now stop the immigrants from reaching the very shores of those who went bombarding Libya while facing the ire of those same immigrants who clearly do not want to stay in these countries? Most decisions are taken which are out of our hands. That's how life is.