Ubik
Nothing happens until something moves!
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2010
- Messages
- 19,408
Aaron Bastani acting in bad faith again, how very very surprising.
Aaron Bastani acting in bad faith again, how very very surprising.
Nah your right Brexit is bloodly brilliant. My frustration is with his shite all Remain campaigns how been.See, case in point isn't it?
You're offering no objections to the suggestion that Brexit is bad for the country, but flat out refuse to do anything to stop it except snipe..
Like who for example ?There's no doubt whatsoever that the Remain campaign desperately needs a more radical voice.
It's why its so fecking frustrating that those that could provide it have been engaged in an active process of completely refusing to do anything about it other than complain that that vacuum that exists has been filled by voices you don't like.
The Brexit Party(A party only formed only months ago which has only policy - No deal)came top in the EU elections(Beating the most Remain -ish party by 10 points)Brexit Party won over 50% of the vote in the EU election did they?
The Brexit Party(A party only months ago which has only policy - No deal Brexit)can top in the EU elections(Beating the most Remain -ish party by 10 points)
Plus the Brexit is polling around 2nd or 1st in national polling.
It's sadly doing very well for a party with one policy.
Well we agree here.Which just shows what we’ve known since June 2016, half the country wants Brexit, and half doesn’t. It’s the biggest political event of our time, and both the big parties are making a total arse of it.
The differece you have to understand the crisis your in and create a narrative. Post 2008 the Left has had one, The PV post refendum hasn't.
There's a difference between been forceful and full conviction because of both your political idoeology and your analysis of the current political crisis which result into trying to creat a masse base and well...... shouting guardian headlines at rallies and calling people stupid for not agreeing with you.
The Brexit Party(A party only formed only months ago which has only policy - No deal)came top in the EU elections(Beating the most Remain -ish party by 10 points)
Plus the Brexit is polling around 2nd or 1st in national polling.
It's sadly doing very well for a party with one policy.
Nah your right Brexit is bloodly brilliant. My frustration is with his shite all Remain campaigns how been.
Like who for example ?
The best alternative was to united behind some form of soft Brexit when Remain lost with maybe a future peope vote. Instead liberals lost there shit, tried to get rid of the only socalist leader the Labour Party has had, called anyone who voted leave mental ill, Campbell as the spokesman of campaign, voting in the millions to just fecking stopping Brexit(Truly a genius political act) and invited Michael heseltine to speak(P.s The People vote try to deselect one Labour MP - Ian lavery, former member of the NUM)
Sorry again why are you mad that left and radical voices are not showing up ?
Still even with the mountain full of shite the People vote has done, Corbyn has came for a people vote and any future Remain vote in another referendum would have the left vote.
What PV narrative then ?The PV campaign have a clear narrative though, you just don't like or agree with it fully, hence this bizarre stance where committed EU Remainers are somehow bad because they alienate the right, but leftists (some of whom will fall into the former bracket) who support Corbyn are acting in good faith and somehow executing an ideal political strategy when they slate Tories and Blairites constantly. There really isn't all that much of a difference, it's just that the latter inspires your confidence whereas the former doesn't. Which is fine, if that's where your politics lie, because we're always going to be more sympathetic to our own side, but I'm struggling to see what the difference is.
Yeah but to that is pointless, the tories are clearly getting closer and closer to no deal.But the committed Remain parties beat out the committed Leave parties (if we're excluding Tories and Labour here).
Personally, I'd be directing my anger towards the fact that Labour have been so absolutely insipid on this issue that people think campaigns and parties that you clearly think are terrible are better than what Labour are peddling.
What PV narrative then ?
Simply Remaining isn't political position or it isn't one that clearly is enough to get us closer to another vote or even a giant lead in the polling for remain. It would be great if just pointing out the lies of the leave campaign was enough but it isn't, there has to be more.
How much have these people learned that will stop them from losing any future referendum. To there nothing to suggest a new campaign will be different than the one in 2016.
I don't just dislike PV because of its politics but also because it's being fecking useless.
Yeah but to that is pointless, the tories are clearly getting closer and closer to no deal.
Despite 'the mountains of shite' support for remaining in the UK has been steadily growing. Whatever your personal opinions on it the suggestion that the People's Vote campaign is hardening attitudes against Remaining is ill supported. The entire basis for your argument rests (if we're kind) on absolutely nothing.
Personally, I'd be directing my anger towards the fact that Labour have been so absolutely insipid on this issue that people think campaigns and parties that you clearly think are terrible are better than what Labour are peddling.
The thing that the Joneses and the Bastanis of this world fail to realise is that defending what Labour are doing in the way that they're doing (and the way you did above) achieves nothing but further convince people that Labour have nothing for left wing Remainers anymore.
The EU election the Brexit party came on on top, it's only second or first in polling. Christ this ''growing support'' couldn't even get beyond 40% turnout for the EU elections.Despite 'the mountains of shite' support for remaining in the UK has been steadily growing. Whatever your personal opinions on it the suggestion that the People's Vote campaign is hardening attitudes against Remaining is ill supported. The entire basis for your argument rests (if we're kind) on absolutely nothing
Personally, I'd be directing my anger towards the fact that Labour have been so absolutely insipid on this issue that people think campaigns and parties that you clearly think are terrible are better than what Labour are peddling.
They will get a left wing manifesto and a people vote.The thing that the Joneses and the Bastanis of this world fail to realise is that defending what Labour are doing in the way that they're doing (and the way you did above) achieves nothing but further convince people that Labour have nothing for left wing Remainers anymore.
The mental thing about this place is that it's gone from some Labour members arguing with the Corbyn supporting lot that Labour has to broaden and be less ideological, to now those members arguing with the Corbyn lot that they should be less broad and more ideological. Anyone involved actually think they've not been hypocritical at any point?
What's stranger is the policies some urged Labour to drop were actually polling well whilst now remain is clearly failing to poll well 99% of the time.
I'm going to say those who call Corbyn unfit to lead but at the same time argue he's the only possible person who can push the country towards remain probably aren't in the right but are hypocrites who like a moan.
Labour going to these marches doesn't stop labour leave MP voting leave(If we had a Democratic Party it could but guess who was against that idea)it doesn't make Tory MP's vote against their party.Nothing has changed because the big parties have both refused to back Remain clearly, and it’s been left to groups like PV to carry the water. If Labour had come out as a clear Remain party straight after the referendum then the picture could be very different now. Parties are supposed to change the public perception not just try and cash in on the mood of the moment.
I've mentioned already that labour should have gave brexit policy to members.. Unless we’re saying Labour shouldn’t represent the clear will of their own membership.
The mental thing about this place is that it's gone from some Labour members arguing with the Corbyn supporting lot that Labour has to broaden and be less ideological, to now those members arguing with the Corbyn lot that they should be less broad and more ideological. Anyone involved actually think they've not been hypocritical at any point?
What's stranger is the policies some urged Labour to drop were actually polling well whilst now remain is clearly failing to poll well 99% of the time.
I'm going to say those who call Corbyn unfit to lead but at the same time argue he's the only possible person who can push the country towards remain probably aren't in the right but are hypocrites who like a moan.
They're terribly concerned about the affect of Brexit on our nation's poorest, so they've surrounded themselves with the same Tories and Lib Dems who were happily voting to shaft them long before Brexit came along.What PV narrative then?
What do you want Labour to do ? Corbyn and shadow cabinet members have came out for a people vote.
How would him coming out for a second referendum 'earlier' have changed the arithmetic in the Commons?Ah come on now. Corbyn waiting until the last possible minute to say a variation of ‘ok, if we can’t get an election, and if a series of other alternatives don’t play out, then under those limited circumstances we’d back a people’s vote’ is hardly a position of clear support.
If he’d come out for a 2nd ref a lot earlier it might actually have happened. Now we’re a few months away from crashing out and there’s hardly any time or options left to prevent that worse case scenario, let along have a 2nd ref.
I supported Corbyn before Brexit, and now I despise the fecker for the dishonest and duplicitous way he has refused to do what he promised to do and represent the will of the membership. At the least the Tories are just being the immoral bastards they always are. Corbyn actually fooled me into thinking he had some integrity. I won’t make that mistake with him again.
Yep I like to the answer for this one.How would him coming out for a second referendum 'earlier' have changed the arithmetic in the Commons?
Don't have the figures to hand but how close were some of the 2nd referendum amendments to passing... Then how many labour MP's didn't vote for them or abstained because they didn't want to go against labour policy.How would him coming out for a second referendum 'earlier' have changed the arithmetic in the Commons?
Which of those amendments have Labour not supported then?Don't have the figures to hand but how close were some of the 2nd referendum amendments to passing... Then how many labour MP's didn't vote for them or abstained because they didn't want to go against labour policy.
I don't know if it would have made a difference gut feel probably not... But it would probably have made it closer at least
Don't have the figures to hand but how close were some of the 2nd referendum amendments to passing... Then how many labour MP's didn't vote for them or abstained because they didn't want to go against labour policy.
I don't know if it would have made a difference gut feel probably not... But it would probably have made it closer at least
How would him coming out for a second referendum 'earlier' have changed the arithmetic in the Commons?
So you think Corbyn coming out for a second referendum 'earlier,' would have made the likes of (off the top of my head) Caroline Flint, Kate Hoey, Ian Austin, John Mann and Gareth Snell do a complete 180 on the issue?A major party energetically supporting a motion often changes the parliamentary arithmetic. Look at the number of MPs who changed their position since the referendum. Leave supporting MPs were in a substantial minority before the ref and after large numbers of Remain MPs switched. Narratives take hold in parliament and people change positions. An intense Labour campaign might have changed enough minds. It might not have also, but now we’ll never know.
So you think Corbyn coming out for a second referendum 'earlier,' would have made the likes of (off the top of my head) Caroline Flint, Kate Hoey, Ian Austin, John Mann and Gareth Snell do a complete 180 on the issue?
It's quite impressive how Corbyn goes from being a crap leader to having the ability to Jedi mind trick pro-Brexit MPs at the drop of a hat.
Hold on are you saying Anna "austerity was absolutely necessary" Soubry might not care about working people.They're terribly concerned about the affect of Brexit on our nation's poorest, so they've surrounded themselves with the same Tories and Lib Dems who were happily voting to shaft them long before Brexit came along.
So you think Corbyn coming out for a second referendum 'earlier,' would have made the likes of (off the top of my head) Caroline Flint, Kate Hoey, Ian Austin, John Mann and Gareth Snell do a complete 180 on the issue?
Their position would have been much less tenable if it was in the face of a full throated Labour Remain campaign.
As for Corbyn’s ability, surely that’s the point. By not even trying to achieve those things, he made his own position extremely clear. If he’d tried and failed because of that groups intransigence, then I’d be blaming them not him. I don’t expect a leader to be a miracle worker, but if they’re genuine about something then I certainly expect them to at least try.
The party has repeatedly whipped in support and they've done the exact opposite and yet, you're blaming him and not them. So no, you wouldn't be doing what you claim.Their position would have been much less tenable if it was in the face of a full throated Labour Remain campaign.
As for Corbyn’s ability, surely that’s the point. By not even trying to achieve those things, he made his own position extremely clear. If he’d tried and failed because of that groups intransigence, then I’d be blaming them not him. I don’t expect a leader to be a miracle worker, but if they’re genuine about something then I certainly expect them to at least try.
Just this morning on the telly
The party has repeatedly whipped in support and they've done the exact opposite and yet, you're blaming him and not them. So no, you wouldn't be doing what you claim.
Corbyn allowed his own shadow cabinet members to defy the whip. Is it any surprise that he’s not being taken seriously?
Thanks for proving my point.
Remember the glory days when calling for MPs to have the whip removed or attempting to have them deselected was Stalinist? Good times.
Caroline Flint isn't a cabinet member though, so what do you propose for her?Voting against your parties whip has always been an immediate firing offense for cabinet members, regardless of your party.
He doesn't mention Corbyn does he?This is bizarre framing. Is he saying that Jeremy Corbyn should've helped vote through May's deal in order to head off no deal and Farage, and that the PV campaign stopped him?
So far there hasn't be enough to outweighs the labour leave MP's. And also I'm not sure how Jeremy "commie Marxist terrorist" Corbyn(That what Tories think of him)is going to win them over.Which shows she’s a disgrace to the party and should have the whip withdrawn. Meanwhile are we going to ignore the substantial number of Remain supporting Tories who are available?
No, he just blames the Peoples Vote campaign for no deal being an increasingly likely option. I was trying to work out how he figured that out, given Corbyn could easily have pushed the deal through with Labour votes. But Bastani is your basic Corbyn cheerleader with no original thoughts of his own and will frequently lie to push that agenda, so I wasn't really expecting much else either.He doesn't mention Corbyn does he?
Dunno... For sure this one from the libs where they ordered people to abstain (and most did)Which of those amendments have Labour not supported then?