Brexited | the worst threads live the longest

Do you think there will be a Deal or No Deal?


  • Total voters
    194
  • Poll closed .
The thing is, from my perspective I know that your last paragraph is factually incorrect, which is such a clear illustration of why your entire attitude to resolving this political situation leads to incorrect conclusions and thus is unlikely to lead to incorrect solutions.

When you're educating these lying idiots on their ignorance, there's no reason they'll believe you have a clearer understanding of things, when you're displaying your own ignorance by telling them that they voted (or didn't) for reasons other than they say.

You can't know why I didn't vote, or whether I voted for Leave. You can only trust your own judgment. On the other hand I do know that I didn't vote, and why. So I can see conclusively that your grasp of the nuance of these issues is not correct. Your approach to this discussion puts you at a disadvantage by default, as it's based on assumptions you can't verify without the other person's help, which you refuse on principle.

I don't think my grasp of the nuance of these issues is correct either, for what it's worth. This isn't me saying I'm right and you're wrong. It's just me saying that you're wrong, because it's a factual question I have direct knowledge of.

It's up to you what to do with that. I don't think you're an idiot for not believing me, and I don't think your viewpoint is illegitimate for making that error. If I was to call you an idiot for that misjudgement, it might be worth considering how that would influence you.

But it is the truth: on this one thing, you are entirely wrong. If you are similarly wrong about the other things that underpin your overall mindset, then I guarantee you it does not benefit you or your cause to shout about it to people you perceive to be idiots, liars, racists and all the rest. It's your choice on whether to listen to the truth, or to believe your own superior judgment of the world. I'd be very surprised if refusing to listen to people with a different opinion to yours, deligitimising their view and demonising them would be a successful strategy to achieve your stated goal.

Also, I think it's worth reviewing what led to you the conclusion I made a Leaver argument. It's certainly not how I would interpret things. The very fact I'm not pro Remain in a conclusive way makes you think I'm pro Leave. As soon as you detect I'm not on your side, I must be on the other side. I'm sorry but the world is not that simple.

Factually incorrect? I said that I thought at least 50% of people with similar opinions to yourself were lying about how they voted - you could easily be among the other 50% so I'm not sure how that "fact" backs up the other 280,000 words you have written on the subject.

You should write shorter posts - there will be less to backtrack on when you've grasped the wrong end of the stick.
 
:lol:

Euthanasia for who exactly?

I don’t really have a list, to be honest. But we could start with something along the lines of “anyone who volunteers for it and is medically evaluated as being of sound mind”

I still fail to see why any of this really relates to Brexit, mind.
 
Factually incorrect? I said that I thought at least 50% of people with similar opinions to yourself were lying about how they voted - you could easily be among the other 50% so I'm not sure how that "fact" backs up the other 280,000 words you have written on the subject.

You should write shorter posts - there will be less to backtrack on when you've grasped the wrong end of the stick.

How anyone can come across so smug and condescending while discussing their own ignorance and irresponsibility is beyond me
 
On the euthanasia debate - there is a vast difference between "forced euthanasia" of the elderly and infirm and for example, the Dutch understanding as assisted suicide and termination of life upon request.

A sick person having the right to choose to end their own life is a very difference discussion to forcibly killing off old and sick people to solve over-population. Anyone advocating for the second option needs to go and have a sit down for themselves.
 
I think that overpopulation is a serious problem in the UK, and to an extent the rest of Europe. I think euthanasia or other forms of population control would be a sensible idea at this stage (within reason), similarly I don’t have any issue with bringing back the death penalty.

None of the above is mutually exclusive with being pro-EU as far as I’m concerned.
Over populations is a problem everywhere.
The funny thing is that in the UK you see teenage mums with a bunch of kids in buggies, more so than other EU countries imho. Sex education is the key
 
Over populations is a problem everywhere.
The funny thing is that in the UK you see teenage mums with a bunch of kids in buggies, more so than other EU countries imho. Sex education is the key

I entirely agree. I’ve gotten to the age now where not only have most of my friends got married and had kids, but that several of them are now having/trying for their second! (I’m early 30s).

Sex education, and also I would be trying to make some serious changes to the child welfare system to try not to incentivise people to have more than one child.
 
@Brwned

If you're going to quote my posts to try and make a point, you're going to need to explain how they are relevant to the discussion we're having. Me being smug and condescending to you being wrong and silly is not the same as you being smug and condescending to someone else while you are still the one being wrong and silly.
 
I don’t really have a list, to be honest. But we could start with something along the lines of “anyone who volunteers for it and is medically evaluated as being of sound mind”

I still fail to see why any of this really relates to Brexit, mind.

I don't really see where the population control starts here. Population control insinuates that there is an institutionalized system that would artificially maintain a predetermined population density, it needs to be systemic otherwise you are controlling nothing. For example you could imagine a system that pays someone to end its life, the money could go to whoever they want.
 
@Brwned

If you're going to quote my posts to try and make a point, you're going to need to explain how they are relevant to the discussion we're having. Me being smug and condescending to you being wrong and silly is not the same as you being smug and condescending to someone else while you are still the one being wrong and silly.

I would do but I think that post is all we need to end the conversation. To me it's a good example of being smug and condescending, while also displaying your ignorance. It doesn't bother me that you can't see why, and you've shown no appetite to listen to an alternative view. Plus you asked me to use fewer words, so I thought I'd just use none of my own words. You seem to value your own much more.
 
I don't really see where the population control starts here. Population control insinuates that there is an institutionalized system that would artificially maintain a predetermined population density, it needs to be systemic otherwise you are controlling nothing. For example you could imagine a system that pays someone to end its life, the money could go to whoever they want.

I feel like this is nitpicking a bit, rather than looking at the spirit of the post/discussion. Either way, again I don’t see what this really has to do with Brexit, so I am going to stop here. The only reason I posted was to illustrate that some of the ideas being discussed are not exclusive to leave voters/supporters.
 
There's some very alarming remarks been made about euthanasia. Even if you're in favour of people having the right to opt for euthanasia, that won't make much difference to population numbers - only compulsory euthanasia would do that. Be careful what you wish for.
 
I think that overpopulation is a serious problem in the UK, and to an extent the rest of Europe. I think euthanasia or other forms of population control would be a sensible idea at this stage (within reason), similarly I don’t have any issue with bringing back the death penalty.

None of the above is mutually exclusive with being pro-EU as far as I’m concerned.
Population growth is a concern for most countries. But I rather doubt either Euthanasia or the death penalty is an effective control for population growth. It is, surely, a miniscule number of people/families that would rather be euthanised? And the death penalty would hardly make a dent also, even if you kill all the inmates currently serving life sentences in the UK (<10k).

This is not to say it is not fine if you support these positions from a moral/political perspective.
 
Last edited:
I feel like this is nitpicking a bit, rather than looking at the spirit of the post/discussion. Either way, again I don’t see what this really has to do with Brexit, so I am going to stop here. The only reason I posted was to illustrate that some of the ideas being discussed are not exclusive to leave voters/supporters.

That's not nitpicking that's what the other poster was talking about, population control, and you described euthanasia as a form of population control. I'm sorry If I'm sticking to the point that both of you were making about population control. And the issue with his ideas weren't that they are limited to leavers, they are absolutely daft.
 
There's some very alarming remarks been made about euthanasia. Even if you're in favour of people having the right to opt for euthanasia, that won't make much difference to population numbers - only compulsory euthanasia would do that. Be careful what you wish for.

You may be right Penna, but it’s a start. Societal views change dramatically over time, and what is currently deemed as something that very few people would do, may become more commonplace as society begins to accept and adjust.

With constantly advancing medicka techbology allowing people to live longer and longer, people can have longer and longer retirements. Pensions may run out, and quality of life may go downhill (if you are essentially being kept alive by medicine). I could easily imagine the uptake on voluntary euthanasia increasing dramatically over time.
 
There's some very alarming remarks been made about euthanasia. Even if you're in favour of people having the right to opt for euthanasia, that won't make much difference to population numbers - only compulsory euthanasia would do that. Be careful what you wish for.

Scary isn't it. If they were next in line, their view may change. Where is the UK heading?
 
I would do but I think that post is all we need to end the conversation. To me it's a good example of being smug and condescending, while also displaying your ignorance. It doesn't bother me that you can't see why, and you've shown no appetite to listen to an alternative view. Plus you asked me to use fewer words, so I thought I'd just use none of my own words. You seem to value your own much more.

Fair enough. I've no interest in continuing a conversation with someone unable or unwilling to engage in proper debate. Best of luck with your words and views.
 
You may be right Penna, but it’s a start. Societal views change dramatically over time, and what is currently deemed as something that very few people would do, may become more commonplace as society begins to accept and adjust.

With constantly advancing medicka techbology allowing people to live longer and longer, people can have longer and longer retirements. Pensions may run out, and quality of life may go downhill (if you are essentially being kept alive by medicine). I could easily imagine the uptake on voluntary euthanasia increasing dramatically over time.
I don't know if we have to intervene quite so dramatically. Apparently, expected life in the UK has tailed off recently. It may well be that population plateaus as an equilibrium is reached between what the earth can support and number of humans.

Actually, a traumatic event like Brexit might brake population growth quite a bit, albeit inadvertently.
 
I don’t really have a list, to be honest. But we could start with something along the lines of “anyone who volunteers for it and is medically evaluated as being of sound mind”

I still fail to see why any of this really relates to Brexit, mind.

I’m for euthanasia being legalised but I don’t think it would do that much to impact the aging population, nor that it should be legalised with that intent.
 
You may be right Penna, but it’s a start. Societal views change dramatically over time, and what is currently deemed as something that very few people would do, may become more commonplace as society begins to accept and adjust.

With constantly advancing medicka techbology allowing people to live longer and longer, people can have longer and longer retirements. Pensions may run out, and quality of life may go downhill (if you are essentially being kept alive by medicine). I could easily imagine the uptake on voluntary euthanasia increasing dramatically over time.
I've looked after a lot of folk with chronic and terminal illness, and the vast majority of them held on tightly to life right until the end. Dementia is awful and upsetting if it's your loved one who's affected, but no-one knows what the person with dementia is thinking. There was a very shocking case in Holland recently, where a woman with dementia was restrained so that she could be given a lethal injection.
Scary isn't it. If they were next in line, their view may change. Where is the UK heading?
I have no idea, Paul, but that particular Pandora's box should never be opened. You start off with a set of strict guidelines, and then they get frayed around the edges, and before you know it old folk with no-one to advocate for them will have their mortal coils shuffled off for them.
 
This is exactly how Thatcher's Britain started.
 
I've looked after a lot of folk with chronic and terminal illness, and the vast majority of them held on tightly to life right until the end. Dementia is awful and upsetting if it's your loved one who's affected, but no-one knows what the person with dementia is thinking. There was a very shocking case in Holland recently, where a woman with dementia was restrained so that she could be given a lethal injection.

I have no idea, Paul, but that particular Pandora's box should never be opened. You start off with a set of strict guidelines, and then they get frayed around the edges, and before you know it old folk with no-one to advocate for them will have their mortal coils shuffled off for them.
How is that not murder?
 
Last edited:
People taking about overpopulation when there's way too much waste in our systems, no mention of moving towards sustainability or building up infrastructure, no..... Let's kill people, that's what we'll do. I know, what about a Purge?
 
Last edited:
I think that overpopulation is a serious problem in the UK, and to an extent the rest of Europe. I think euthanasia or other forms of population control would be a sensible idea at this stage (within reason), similarly I don’t have any issue with bringing back the death penalty.

None of the above is mutually exclusive with being pro-EU as far as I’m concerned.

Surely only a minuscule percentage of the population actually want to be euthanised. How would that solve anything?
 
How is that not murder?
Well, I think it was, but then, I'm opposed to euthanasia under any circumstances - I'm aware that many people would disagree with me. If you google "Dutch woman restrained for euthanasia" you'll find more details - the doctor was reprimanded, but cleared in a criminal prosecution.

@Classical Mechanic, I read about that terrible case, I feel for that man and I can understand why he made his decision. It's very different from someone who no longer has capacity to give consent at the point of dying, though.

Anyway, I'm helping to take this thread off-topic, so I'll stop now.
 
Jesus, this thread has taken a weird and dark turn. Brexit has clearly driven us all so insane that we're contemplating population control through mass killings.
 
Anyone suggesting euthanasia as a means of population control is truly a worrying person to me.
 
People taking about overpopulation when there's way too much waste in our systems, no mention of moving towards sustainability or building up infrastructure, no..... Let's kill people, that's what we'll do. I know, what about a Purge?
Increased investment in the NHS, universities, infrastructure (railways, roads etc) and renewable power supplies in order to generate both high and low skilled jobs.

I tried
 
Yeah weird right. The message is consistent, it's supported by evidence, and yet that in your mind is just more proof that it's untrue. What other people tell you is pretty worthless, in reality. You know what they're thinking, even if they don't know it. Or they know it and they're just liars. That's the only possibility here.

For the record, I didn't vote Leave. I didn't vote. I'm one of those young folks that so many people on here sneer at. Lazy bugger, couldn't even get himself to the voting booth. Actually I stood right outside a voting station as my girlfriend went in and voted. I encouraged her to as well. It's incomprehensible to many people that I didn't vote in that scenario, in the same way it's incomprehensible to you that some people voted for Leave for reasons other than immigration. Yet both things are a matter of fact.

I'm not even sure I'd vote in a second referendum, but I lean towards the Remain side. I'm one of those weirdos that isn't firmly in one camp. I find myself in the middle on many things. fecked up, right? Like the majority of the population, I don't really understand what the EU is, what it does, how it influences my life, or why I should care. Unlike the majority of the population, I don't think it's useful to vote for something in ignorance, based on instinct. If I don't have a worthy opinion on a subject, I choose not to offer an unworthy one.

All I can tell you is there are lots of things you don't understand. Just like me, and everyone else in the country. It's not just those stupid Leave voters, or those lazy-non voters. I understand why from that position of ignorance, you rationalise people making these decisions you don't understand as people being deceitful, stupid, lazy and any other number of things. It doesn't change the fact that unfortunately you are wrong, and becoming entrenched in that position makes it more difficult to achieve your declared political goal.
Hold up, aren't you Danish anyway? So I'm not sure you could have voted, even if you wanted to? Happy to be proven wrong if that isn't the case...
 
Do any of you condescending, self righteous remainers understand why people with other opinions to your own, despise you to the core?
This seems like the equivalent of ASTD (attention seeking twat disorder) for posts. Why don't you just respond to a specific post, instead of trying to wind up most of the posters?
 
Do any of you condescending, self righteous remainers understand why people with other opinions to your own, despise you to the core?

I think we understand perfectly. People don't like a light being shone on their idiocy and small mindedness.

Farage and Trump both get terribly upset when it's done to them too.