Brexited | the worst threads live the longest

Do you think there will be a Deal or No Deal?


  • Total voters
    194
  • Poll closed .
@Paul the Wolf, the only answer is to revoke Article 50. I think that's why MPs are pressing so hard right now to get clarity on the Article 50 extension debate and potential amendments to it.

Yes but who's going to actually do that. Don't think anyone in parliament has got the guts to go against the "will of the people"
 
Because it won't be economically stable.

If Remain wins 51 vs 49, nothing will be settled.

This will go on forever.

The remainers need to learn to compromise. The leavers need to learn to compromise.

The compromise would be a CU and freedom of movement etc. Very close partnership, though we would of course have to abide by any changes the EU makes(the labour model, basically).

Of course, it's a bad idea when compared to the deal we have. But it would mean we have left, and the parties could choose to run on their vision of the future relationship at general elections.
 
Heres the thing though...

Say MP's vote against no deal tomorrow, then vote for an extension on thursday. May goes to the EU and says we want an extension, and they ask why. She says no idea, we just do so we can figure something out, they'll most likely turn around and say no chance. Once the EU rules out an extension, and a second referendum has no majority, it'll either go to a general election, or May will slam her deal back on the table and say it's either this or the legal default of no deal.

Just going round in circles.

This is basically it even if the EU grants the extension. At the end of the extension period we'd end up right back here.

The reaction out of Brussels tonight has been cold too. The continental politicians are not happy. Can't see them being willing to keep going around the houses.
 
Actually it'll solve a lot. We'll know when informed of what brexit would actually look like whether the public want it or not
But we'll have:-

Right wing riots (bad)
Tory party split (good)
A new ultra-right populist party (bad)
Calls for a third referendum (bad)
 
@Paul the Wolf, the only answer is to revoke Article 50. I think that's why MPs are pressing so hard right now to get clarity on the Article 50 extension debate and potential amendments to it.

That's not going to go through. They are not going to vote against the will of the people.
 
Come on, you posted this over two months ago now regarding Labour's next moves



Meanwhile I'm listening to Richard Burgon saying "we want a common sense Brexit" right now. "A public vote may become necessary but our priority is a Labour brexit".

My point is i don't understand why the poster thinks Labour have ruled one out. They've done no such thing and i expect them to do so this week again in the same fashion of Labour Brexit and if that fails 2nd ref.
 
But wouldn't a second referendum destroy the trust in UK politics?
It's essentially says to the public - you got it wrong the first time, now do it correctly now. 17 million people will feel betrayed, and to some it'll feel like their votes mean nothing.
To me it's comes across that they're admitting they've hit a brick wall and this is an opportunity for the public to have the final say.
 
Latest position?

Of what the population? There won't be a referendum before March 29

Just to be clear. The WA has been rejected.
The current legal position is that a law has previously been passed that the UK will leave the EU on 29th.
Even if they reject a no deal exit tomorrow that vote does not override the current law.

To stop that the law will have to be changed. The vote cannot override the law unless that law is changed.
 
The compromise would be a CU and freedom of movement etc. Very close partnership, though we would of course have to abide by any changes the EU makes(the labour model, basically).

Of course, it's a bad idea when compared to the deal we have. But it would mean we have left, and the parties could choose to run on their vision of the future relationship at general elections.
Exactly. Preech man.

Of course I'm not happy with it. Neither are you.

But I could learn to live with it. And so could most people
 
Brexit is basically the same as it was on the 24th June 2016 - the lunatics leading the blind by using the idiots' votes.
 
This is what leavers thought they were voting for anyway. All this talk of a deal was an afterthought, once the votes had been counted.

The few l know who voted leave had no clue what they voted for. Some admit this and some now pretend they did. Let's face it even the staunchest remain voter didn't know the sheer depth and breadth of the consequences at the time of the vote.
 
I reckon for 2nd referendum to happen UK will have to experience no deal consequences for a few weeks and when economy will start tanking with all the chaos in the background in the short space of time it will be a good time to call it a day.
 
My point is i don't understand why the poster thinks Labour have ruled one out. They've done no such thing and i expect them to do so this week again in the same fashion of Labour Brexit and if that fails 2nd ref.
By your own expectations up there, they should be on the "all out for second ref" stage by now, not still the "yes it's still on the table but really let's have an election so we can do a Labour brexit" one that's been tried for about six months, with less than three weeks to go.
 
I reckon for 2nd referendum to happen UK will have to experience no deal consequences for a few weeks and when economy will start tanking with all the chaos in the background in the short space of time it will be a good time to call it a day.

Probably the logical way to a 2nd ref but not if you have to experience it...
 
But we'll have:-

Right wing riots (bad)
Tory party split (good)
A new ultra-right populist party (bad)
Calls for a third referendum (bad)

I doubt the riots, we might have some disturbances but not much.

I'm not sure what the call for a third referendum will be considering we now know what's available and it'll only be required if the public reject Mays deal. To go back and negotiate a soft brexit? Sounds reasonable i suppose at least it would be an easier negotiation
 
Just to be clear. The WA has been rejected.
The current legal position is that a law has previously been passed that the UK will leave the EU on 29th.
Even if they reject a no deal exit tomorrow that vote does not override the current law.

To stop that the law will have to be changed. The vote cannot override the law unless that law is changed.
All true.

I'm just talking about where the current political train is heading .

I really didn't think an extension was going to happen before tonight.

Of course it's possible that 400 MPs will vote for a no deal Brexit and ... Well... That would solve something at least!
 
Here are the figures for how MPs voted for the deal by party.

For

Conservatives: 235

Labour: 3

Independents: 4

Against

Labour: 238

Conservatives: 75

SNP: 35

Independents: 17

Lib Dems: 11

DUP: 10

Plaid Cymru: 4

Green: 1

If the Uk crash out, I wonder who will take the blame.
 
Here are the figures for how MPs voted for the deal by party.

For

Conservatives: 235

Labour: 3

Independents: 4

Against

Labour: 238

Conservatives: 75

SNP: 35

Independents: 17

Lib Dems: 11

DUP: 10

Plaid Cymru: 4

Green: 1

If the Uk crash out, I wonder who will take the blame.

Easy. Those politicians who blatantly lied to the British people.
 
Yes but who's going to actually do that. Don't think anyone in parliament has got the guts to go against the "will of the people"
If no deal is ruled out tomorrow (which it will be), and the EU then reject an extension because the UK has nothing new to bring to the table (which they haven't) then the only way to honour "no leaving with no deal" is to stop the clock by revocation.

Any extension proposal has to be unanimously agreed by EU member states, and we all know that there are going to be trumps played by some other countries (like Spain with the Gibralter issue).
 
By your own expectations up there, they should be on the "all out for second ref" stage by now, not still the "yes it's still on the table but really let's have an election so we can do a Labour brexit" one that's been tried for about six months, with less than three weeks to go.

Very true but i really didn't expect this 2 month freeze where nothings actually happened. May pressed the snooze button and prevented much progress, hard to table amendments or call for anything when Mays "negotiating" again.
 
Isn't the current status in parliament a democratic reflection of the referendum?

Majority voting against something without a fecking clue what they want.
 
Here are the figures for how MPs voted for the deal by party.

For

Conservatives: 235

Labour: 3

Independents: 4

Against

Labour: 238

Conservatives: 75

SNP: 35

Independents: 17

Lib Dems: 11

DUP: 10

Plaid Cymru: 4

Green: 1

If the Uk crash out, I wonder who will take the blame.

Cameron. The spud faced chancer.
 
The few l know who voted leave had no clue what they voted for. Some admit this and some now pretend they did. Let's face it even the staunchest remain voter didn't know the sheer depth and breadth of the consequences at the time of the vote.

And not a single one of them can explain the virtues of it yet.
 
The year is 2055
Britain is a wasteland, it’s biggest business is the import of other countries waste. Cars are a luxury. Horses are ridden til they collapse and then eaten. There are no pet dogs and cats anymore, they’ve become a luxury food. Peasants grow their own potatoes. The royal homes were sacked 20 years ago during the great revolution. The country is now run by the pickled head of Jacob Raes-Mogg from its glass jar high up in his giant house made of gold
 
Absolute horseshit

:confused:

You can't suddenly not be in the EU after decades of being in it. A mechanism has to be worked out to allow the UK to stand alone, or the country would crash and burn virtually overnight. That's what they've been attempting to do and it was quite right and proper that the mechanism for leaving was put to the House.

I get that, I'm just saying the people I work with, family and friends I have who voted leave all just assumed it would be a clean break. Hence where a lot of the "get on with it!" talk came from, I guess.

The few l know who voted leave had no clue what they voted for. Some admit this and some now pretend they did. Let's face it even the staunchest remain voter didn't know the sheer depth and breadth of the consequences at the time of the vote.

Agreed
 
The year is 2055
Britain is a wasteland, it’s biggest business is the import of other countries waste. Cars are a luxury. Horses are ridden til they collapse and then eaten. There are no pet dogs and cats anymore, they’ve become a luxury food. Peasants grow their own potatoes. The royal homes were sacked 20 years ago during the great revolution. The country is now run by the pickled head of Jacob Raes-Mogg from its glass jar high up in his giant house made of gold
...and Liverpool still haven't won the league.
 
The year is 2055
Britain is a wasteland, it’s biggest business is the import of other countries waste. Cars are a luxury. Horses are ridden til they collapse and then eaten. There are no pet dogs and cats anymore, they’ve become a luxury food. Peasants grow their own potatoes. The royal homes were sacked 20 years ago during the great revolution. The country is now run by the pickled head of Jacob Raes-Mogg from its glass jar high up in his giant house made of gold
Subscribe
 
The year is 2055
Britain is a wasteland, it’s biggest business is the import of other countries waste. Cars are a luxury. Horses are ridden til they collapse and then eaten. There are no pet dogs and cats anymore, they’ve become a luxury food. Peasants grow their own potatoes. The royal homes were sacked 20 years ago during the great revolution. The country is now run by the pickled head of Jacob Raes-Mogg from its glass jar high up in his giant house made of gold
FcIfRkj.jpg
 
I don't trust either side, centrism is fecking dead at a time when we need it the most.

We have a parliamentary Conservative party being held to ransom by the DUP and the ERG who won't listen to any kind of reason and will torpedo any deal proposal and cling on for no deal. If we stay in Europe, those right-wing nutjobs are just as much to blame as the left-wing asshat at the helm of the Labour party who purports to be vehemently against no deal, but for the sake of tribalism and political opportunism won't work with the only offer the EU is giving us, because he seems to think he can score a general election out of this clusterfeck.

Feck both sides.