But as an RWB. Not in attackmight be worth a start in carabao cup
But as an RWB. Not in attack
No. Absolutely notYeah. Though hes reasonably good on ball he could work as one of the 2 10s maybe
He was decent in his first season. Didn't have enough end product, but he did fairly well in terms of keeping the ball, getting us up the pitch and helping out defensively. Obviously nowhere near the level his price tag would indicate, but judged purely on his performances on the field he was decent.I don't get this rationale or that he hasn't been as bad as people think ...
Antony cost £80m and was absolutely shite until recently. You don't pay that sort of money for an average winger or unproven wing back. Absolutely the club and EtH's fault, but Antony's lack of output and that stupid hop he likes to do is absolutely on him.
if he cost 18m like amad it might be a different narrative. it is a real shame that fans blame players for their price tag. i can't even imagine the venom if rashford wasn't free
Disagree, as I said I think if he cost 18m people wouldn't be going so nuts over it. Again you talk about the money in your post, while admitting it is irrelevant. I don't think anyone would want to sign him for 18m but he is here now and will hopefully be useful, if people can get over the moneyIf he’d cost 18m he’d still be seen as not good enough based on what he has produced so far. But it’s a huge disadvantage to have players who contribute so little costing so much money in PSR terms. That’s not his fault of course and he’s not the only one but it’s the reality of the situation.
But again you can't help but mention the money. It's because it is the only relevant thing, hence my post.I don't get this rationale or that he hasn't been as bad as people think ...
Antony cost £80m and was absolutely shite until recently. You don't pay that sort of money for an average winger or unproven wing back. Absolutely the club and EtH's fault, but Antony's lack of output and that stupid hop he likes to do is absolutely on him.
Disagree, as I said I think if he cost 18m people wouldn't be going so nuts over it. Again you talk about the money in your post, while admitting it is irrelevant. I don't think anyone would want to sign him for 18m but he is here now and will hopefully be useful, if people can get over the money
Agreed! We need to rotate and id like to see us attack Spurs so I’d be happy with this.Antony's done okay off the bench in the last couple of matches at wing back, I'd like to see him start there against Tottenham and see how he gets on. The wing backs are the two problem positions in the team at the moment but I think Antony might be one of the few in our squad who could be relatively well suited to it.
Money isn't the only relevant factor. Would supporters care if we paid £15m and he was playing the way he does? They wouldn't.But again you can't help but mention the money. It's because it is the only relevant thing, hence my post.
Simply put, in the small sample we've had it has looked promising and more conducive to making things happen, so would rather explore RWB than ask him to switch flanks and be an entirely different player just because he happens to be left-footed.I disagree. I think having them 2 who are similar in the fact there both left footers could work and it would confuse the opposition players as they can rotate positions which is always hard to mark.
It's essentially very similar to what happened with Maguire...
- We paid a huge fee for a player who's good but not world class in his position
- Like Maguire, Anthony is quite easy to bash...Maguire because he's a bit 'simple' and agricultural in his style, Anthony because of the showboating.
- Both players actually did OK in their first season, but were never going to be able to meet the lofty expectations that come with the price tag.
- Both players got hammered when the teams' form dropped off badly and were made the scapegoat, to a certain degree, because of their price tag.
- Both players have now started to perform fine once expectations have been totally reset and people have started judging them solely on their contribution, and not what was paid.
Caveat to this is I do think Maguire is a better player than Anthony, I'd say Maguire, at his peak, is just one notch below world-class, whereas Anthony is hard-working but a few notches below world-class.
I do think that Anthony has two major strengths in an Amorim system....one, he works really hard and is (statistically) an elite level 'defensive winger', based on tackles, interceptions, turnovers etc...Second, he's good at retaining the ball. You can give him the ball in tight areas and unlike Garnacho and Rashford, he doesn't just run blindly into dead-ends. Obviously sometimes the 'running blindly into dead ends' leads to a take-on and a spectacular goal...and this is the bit Anthony generally doesn't offer, with his more conservative style / lack of exceptional pace.