ti vu
Full Member
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2015
- Messages
- 12,799
Not everyone saying he would make no difference. Against Bayern, Arsenal, even Tottenham... he showed glimpses of his quality with the ball. The issue here is not everyone playing like that. Right now, if we're opposition managers, we would think the best way to play against us is just ignoring Onana when he has the ball, and focus on man marking and reduce space at their back. GK is not that influential to how well their team attack from that position. We're not that good at moving the ball to break team down and prevent opposition counter, coming out of their defensive shape, even if we risk pushing the defensive line high. So our strongest weapon (counter) being contained. The supposed improvement Onana bring doesn't truly elevate the team, yet there is insecure feeling creeping in.The people doubling down on this idea that Onana makes no difference to our build up play and beating the press are going to look ridiculous at some point. I reckon deep down they know it’s an absurd point, but they’re just capitalising on this moment of chaos to bask in glee.
If anyone seriously thinks that how we’re playing now is how we’re always going to play with Onana here, they’re living in dreamland. This is a moment where the defensive lineup is decimated and ever-changing, the midfield is trying to play in a new shape, and disastrous results are killing morale across the board. And the change in goalkeeper style is dramatic, even in a normal scenario you’d expect some adjustment before things click.
If you really think that’s the ideal time to judge a keeper, especially in his first 10 games, you’ve lost the plot.
Imagine if De Gea’s first 10 games defined his United career. He couldn’t even keep Lindegaard out.
The comparison with young DDG situation as previously explained is silly. Taking over from VDS of course was a big expectation. Young GK lacking experience to boost. The standard back there where we were naturally expected title challenge coming into season was another different ballgame than nowadays.
So,s people made out replacimg the over the hill DDG of past seasons would be a piece of cake. You also have ETH who coached Onana at Ajax for a few years, he should have known Onana strength and weaknesses to cover and optimize where it fits. A GK with experience and supposed entering his prime years. It's just simply terrible comparison. It's more a case of Barthez, VDS coming in and expected to hit the road running to an acceptable level.
The scary thing about our current situation is if we try the dropping young DDG approach, we either play our new Turkish GK who has no PL experience, or Heaton who is over the hill, and very shite with his distribution. It's the case that ETH put all his eggs into Onana basket, and didn't prepare a Lindegaard for this transition.