Strats
Full Member
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2013
- Messages
- 2,408
Plays like an outfield player put in goal who has no idea about the basics of being a goalkeeper.
Plays like an outfield player put in goal who has no idea about the basics of being a goalkeeper.
The same outstanding defensive record that saw us concede 7 to Liverpool, 6 to City, 4 to Brentford and multiples against countless other teams? Onana might have a touch of the Barthez about him but we don't need to revise history.But it actually wasn't and no mythology will ever make it so.
Despite the undeniable mistakes De Gea made last season, our defensive record last season was outstanding. It was our attacking record last season that was horrendous. In an epic thread over the summer the argument was made that getting rid of De Gea and replacing with him with Onana would improve our attacking record. But that argument is as daft as arguing that bringing in a top CF would improve our defensive record.
Keepers exist primarily to keep clean sheets, or to put it more generously, keep the opponent's goal tally as low as possible. We can all point to the Benrahma goal or the Brentford goal early in the reason as De Gea mistakes in the PL -- don't worry, we'll get to the EL in a moment -- but over the totality of the PL season our defensive record was fantastic, even acknowledging the pasting we took at Anfield. De Gea was an important part of that.
As for the EL, every single one of us is aware of De Gea's calamitous mistakes at Sevilla. But few seem to remember the mistakes our defenders made in the first leg that threw away the tie as every one of us knew that once we botched it v Sevilla at home that our goose was cooked at Sevilla, which began with a ball from De Gea that Maguire should have been able to easily manage but didn't, after which it all fell apart. But the more important point is that we didn't need the EL and many of us dismiss the EL as a joke competition. By then we already had CL qualification in hand -- not because our attack was so fantastic, but because our defense was so fantastic. De Gea, despite his mistakes a Brentford and West Ham, played a critical role in United qualifying for the CL. But what did we do? We got rid of him and brought in a keeper who has already made more mistakes in 8 games than De Gea had all season.
Genius isn't exactly the first word that comes to mind when describing United management.
We didn't need Onana, but we needed a keeper who is better than De Gea.It would be a lot of fun to pile on and remind some posters here that it was a colossal mistake to spend a third of our transfer budget on keeper whom we didn't need. Even for those who were on the "get rid of De Gea" hype train can see that now. And even if getting rid of the golden glove award man was a moral imperative, we could have gone with Henderson or even Heaton, both whom are more solid as shot stoppers than Onana.
But here we are and we have to want Onana to succeed. It would be good man management for ETH to sit Onana down for a few matches and then bring him back. It's been done many times before.
We're not talking about De Gea's mistakes from 10 years ago. Again, go and watch De Gea's howlers against the likes Brentford, Everton, West ham, Sevilla, City last season. One of those games cost us an FA cup final and handed City a treble on a plate. And a lot of those howlers are in an area where he's supposed to be strong, shot stopping. And then add in that he never claims a cross, leaves his line and can't pass a ball.See so many digging out mistakes from DDG to justify Onana mistake. Thing is DDG made those over 10-12 season and with few season full of out of this world performances. Onana has made multiple errors in his first 10-12 games. Find it funny when people comb through videos just to defend the indefensible.
Onana movement is an issue. Either it is fitness issue or something else but his GK reflexes look awkward.
Well, Onana is conceding goals that I could save. So any keeper who can save the most basic of shots would be a massive upgrade on Onana at the minute.is david raya much better than Onana ?
Nice edit. Can't imagine why you changed it.McTominay saved his arse today.
Utd won’t be challenging for any titles with Onana.
DDG had credit in the bank.We're not talking about De Gea's mistakes from 10 years ago. Again, go and watch De Gea's howlers against the likes Brentford, Everton, West ham, Sevilla, City last season. One of those games cost us an FA cup final and handed City a treble on a plate. And a lot of those howlers are in an area where he's supposed to be strong, shot stopping. And then add in that he never claims a cross, leaves his line and can't pass a ball.
I'd bet my house the likes of Klopp, Pep, Arteta, De Zerbi all would have made it a priority to replace De Gea in the summer.
I'm not defending Onana.DDG had credit in the bank.
It was time to replace him but to use his howlers to defend Onana is bit stupid. If we wanted a keeper who will continue to do that, then we would have kept DDG. Onana is being rightly criticised and his technique does raise some serious concerns. Random edits of DDG mistakes wont change the fact that Onana has to be better than what he is at the moment.
We didn't need Onana, but we needed a keeper who is better than De Gea.
Go watch De Gea's howlers against the likes Brentford, Everton, West ham, Sevilla, City last season alone, these would be embarassing errors for a Sunday league keeper. And that's ignoring the fact he'd never claim or cross or leave his line, and couldn't pass a ball.
If De Gea was a howler-free keeper, we could forgive his weaknesses. But he became one of the most error prone keepers in the league, to go alongside his weaknesses.
De Gea literally cost us the FA cup final because he couldn't make basic saves, instead choosing to literally stand and watch the ball go into the net.
The club, as usual, have made the wrong signing, but the signing was in the right position.
I get what you are saying but I just don't see the technique and the skill that is latent in him which will help him find back his form.Another poor mistake today. Better in the second half. But still really can't be letting those past you.
Very concerned looks like his confidence is shot. The combination of the lens goal, the wolves non penalty and a couple of handling errors seem to have turned him into a meek GK.
He needs to put his big boy pants on and play his game, struggling to adapt to the pressure and scrutiny of the position somewhat.
Im not writing him off just yet he isn't as bad as he's currently showing. But he really need to get his best form back otherwise he's going to get eaten up and spat out.
It's very, very simple. We have a bad goalkeeper. There's a better goalkeeper available as a free transfer. That's it.DDG fanboys just won't let go huh?
He's a free agent and still no club wants him, how are you going to make excuse for that? You can't.
Onana may be a downgrade but DDG wasn't it either. Club could still sell Onana for decent money if Murtough wasn't incompetent, he's still a high profile gk.
Not like Pep got keeper that he wanted right off the bat and Ederson isn't exactly good shoot stopper either.
If money was issue, should've kept Kovar then? He looked better than both.It's very, very simple. We have a bad goalkeeper. There's a better goalkeeper available as a free transfer. That's it.
Nightmare.Can you imagine fielding this clown against City when they’ll likely have 26 shots on target?
Wait a minute, how was he one of the best keepers last season? You mean in the CL? His numbers in the league were worse than DDG’s weren’t they? Myself preferred him over Raya but obviously I watched Raya more frequently.One thing I can tell you. We didn't spend 50m with the purpose of downgrading. Onana was one of the best keepers last season.
Its easy to say stuff because hindsight is nice.
If that was horrible what in the name of Christ is this from Onana?The same outstanding defensive record that saw us concede 7 to Liverpool, 6 to City, 4 to Brentford and multiples against countless other teams? Onana might have a touch of the Barthez about him but we don't need to revise history.
De Gea had been costing us big games and making high profile errors for the best part of 5 years, whilst being the best paid goalkeeper in the world. His only quality as a goalkeeper was his shot stopping, and even that had greatly diminished over the last few years. Onana might not turn out to be the answer but you're a masochist if you wanted De Gea to stay on as first-choice goalkeeper. Last season was the culmination of a horrible spell for De Gea at United.
That right there is a typical agenda driven United fan. Either that or you didn’t watch the cup final. We couldn’t create a single quality chance for our forwards until Garmacho entered and did a few runs on their defenders, if it wasn’t for a stupid penalty we wouldn’t have even scored. But here you are DDG lost us the finalWe didn't need Onana, but we needed a keeper who is better than De Gea.
Go watch De Gea's howlers against the likes Brentford, Everton, West ham, Sevilla, City last season alone, these would be embarassing errors for a Sunday league keeper. And that's ignoring the fact he'd never claim or cross or leave his line, and couldn't pass a ball.
If De Gea was a howler-free keeper, we could forgive his weaknesses. But he became one of the most error prone keepers in the league, to go alongside his weaknesses.
De Gea literally cost us the FA cup final because he couldn't make basic saves, instead choosing to literally stand and watch the ball go into the net.
The club, as usual, have made the wrong signing, but the signing was in the right position.
He hasn't been good enough but the people using it as an opportunity to point score about another player who clearly wasn't good enough are just irritating. If Onana keeps making stupid errors he'll face the same fate as the last guy who made too many stupid errors. That's how it works.If that was horrible what in the name of Christ is this from Onana?
It depends what you mean good enough. Good enough to play in a team that can’t score 60 goals in a league season? Yeah DDG was good enough for that team 100%.He hasn't been good enough but the people using it as an opportunity to point score about another player who clearly wasn't good enough are just irritating. If Onana keeps making stupid errors he'll face the same fate as the last guy who made too many stupid errors. That's how it works.
I'm not even sure what point you're trying to make here. De Gea would've been good enough for a team who bailed him out by scoring more goals? So would Onana, or any other goalkeeper in world football for that matter. De Gea wasn't good enough for any team with ambitions to play on the front foot or in top level European competition, hence he was replaced. I suppose you think Spain played the likes of Kepa, Sanchez and Simon ahead of him because they fancied it for a laugh. The fact De Gea still hasn't found a club after being released at the start of July speaks volumes.It depends what you mean good enough. Good enough to play in a team that can’t score 60 goals in a league season? Yeah DDG was good enough for that team 100%.
Onana is clearly not even good enough for that team.
I meant for a team who can’t create and score more than 60 goals in a league season splashing 55m on a new GK wasn’t going to solve anything. DDG was as good as anyone in our back line last season. You talk about front foot football yet we have players of questionable quality and consistency in many far more crucial positions when it comes to build up play. And forget the howlers from Onana, what improvements did we have from his supposed build up play quality and press resistance? Feck all. Some of you have tried to pretend that you have some superior football knowledge and the rest don’t understand front foot pressing and how teams stop pressing us and it helps the team bla bla bla. Well it all has crumbled down like the pile of shot that itI'm not even sure what point you're trying to make here. De Gea would've been good enough for a team who bailed him out by scoring more goals? So would Onana, or any other goalkeeper in world football for that matter. De Gea wasn't good enough for any team with ambitions to play on the front foot or in top level European competition, hence he was replaced. I suppose you think Spain played the likes of Kepa, Sanchez and Simon ahead of him because they fancied it for a laugh. The fact De Gea still hasn't found a club after being released at the start of July speaks volumes.
Onana has been terrible in all aspects that many criticised DDG for years. He is abysmal on crosses, shit in proactive play, absolutely dogshit on long passes, shot stopping and catching is amateur level. And no Ederson is absolutely miles ahead in every aspect. City also replaced Hart in the season after 2015/2016 which was probably one of their weakest ones in the last 10 years, still had the best attack in the league scoring 71 league goals. We had Weghorst on loan last season, from Burnley.Onana's shot stopping has been terrible. I'd make some concessions for him on account of him being new to the club and trying to play in a way that is more demanding of a goalkeeper, rather than being permanently rooted to his line and refusing to pass the ball. As the poster a couple of posts up points out, Ederson would look poor in this team too. He actually has been quite poor for City at times and is still considered one of the better goalkeepers in Europe. If Onana doesn't improve with time, he will rightly be replaced. That still wouldn't make De Gea good enough for this team, in the same way Joe Hart wasn't good enough for City after they sold Bravo.