Alemar
Full Member
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2017
- Messages
- 8,432
They say he still didn’t post anything about the derby win. Why could it be, is he not happy that we win against City?
Why not? Amad did it very well and is now returning to attack - maybe it could be the same route for Garnacho. Unlike Rashford, he has workrate to play LWB, and besides he would be replacing a currently underperforming Dalot (so it’s easier to add value in this case)I don’t think he’s suited to the attacking mid role, can’t see him playing wingback though unless he’s willing to put his ego aside and put a shift both ends.
Regardless of his attitude, he doesn't fit anywhere in the system, so should probably move on.Could be the next big United talent, who did not become a succes.
They say he still didn’t post anything about the derby win. Why could it be, is he not happy that we win against City?
If it is proven that he’s the leak source then I don’t think there is a way backI see a way back for Garnacho, though not Rashford.
They say he still didn’t post anything about the derby win. Why could it be, is he not happy that we win against City?
He should read up on Morrison and really consider what is at stake here.Could be the next big United talent, who did not become a succes.
If it is proven that he’s the leak source then I don’t think there is a way back
If it is proven that he’s the leak source then I don’t think there is a way back
Absolutely! And thousands of other talented young players who pissed away their potential due to hubris.He should read up on Morrison and really consider what is at stake here.
He should read up on Morrison and really consider what is at stake here.
Would be wise to move him on whilst his stock is still relatively high. He doesn't suit them system, would be pure profit and is vastly overrated.Could be the next big United talent, who did not become a succes.
I agree. Rashford is difficult to sell but Garnacho will be easier and should generate at least 50-60m.He's been overplayed the last couple of years out of desperation. We've not really developed him well.
Not sure where he fits into a RA formation, I don't see him having the defensive strength to be a wing back, and he's not a number 10. Great talent, but if he doesn't fit in the system, maybe we sell while we can get a good fee?
Aleakhandro Garnacho
Come on, it's an offense, but hardly anything he can't come back from.
Nah, it's treasonous.Come on, it's an offense, but hardly anything he can't come back from.
But as a side note, I do struggle to see how he fits into Amorim’s team tbh.
Personally, I don't like the wing back idea for two reasons. I don't trust him in possession in deeper areas and his defensive awareness isn't great. Oh, his passsing is also shoddy.I think the idea of him at wing back in this system is quite exciting. Firstly I think it takes away the option of just purely focusing on getting the ball and cutting inside trying to shoot.
It will force him to use more parts of his game than we have seen lately and I also think he is far better at taking players on from a bit deeper than he is around the box.
As far as the defensive side, he has always been pretty game and I think in this system there isn't a huge pressure for the wing back to be a great defender. He also has the physical stamina to play the role.
It really isn't working out for Dalot on that left side so I'd like to see it tried at least.
Personally, I don't like the wing back idea for two reasons. I don't trust him in possession in deeper areas and his defensive awareness isn't great. Oh, his passsing is also shoddy.
The question is, which role is he likely to adapt to quicker, the 10 role or the wingback?
I will pay more attention to this because it may just be bias on my part but I seem to remember us conceding alot of chances because of him losing the ball close to our goal. Loose touches, bad passes or just getting overpowered.I weirdly trust his passing and ability on the ball more the further away from goal he plays. I think he's a better player when the idea of scoring isn't in his head constantly.
I feel like I've seen a lot of neat little passing moments on tight spaces near the half way line.
I will pay more attention to this because it may just be bias on my part but I seem to remember us conceding alot of chances because of him losing the ball close to our goal. Loose touches, bad passes or just getting overpowered.
Unlike @MadMike , I'm not sold on him as a LAM but I do think it's probably his best bet. one of the reason that side of the field is less productive, is the lack of a true outside option e.g. a left footed LWB. Dalot has his qualities but getting a true outside threat on the left that the opposition has to respect will make a huge difference for Garnacho and Hojlund.
I predicted this if you look through earlier posts, he simply doesn’t suit any 3 at the back system because he needs to play as the wide player left or right in a 3 man striker system, he’s not a number 10 or a wing back, he simply doesn’t have the in game IQ, Rashford could be adapted but his whole solemn demeanour is just all wrong, he needs to move away for his own sake too!I reckon the club see the most value in him to sell this summer. We're not going to get a lot for Rashford and so this is the cash cow that will feed our summer spending.
He is the sacrificial lamb for Amorim and no-one saw it coming.