Rhyme Animal
Thinks Di Zerbi is better than Pep.
I came across this interview.
I thought some may like this.
"Blah blah blah. Isn't my ego funny."
Show your 'greatness' on the pitch, mate.
I came across this interview.
I thought some may like this.
Disagree with both of the above. Much preferred seeing a bit of pace and mobility in our attack.
I though both Martial and Rashers were average but I like the pace they bring and I just haven't seen enough from Zlat to suggest he benefits the team.
Disagree strongly with this, pace is massively over-rated for a lone striker, hold up, scoring threat and the ability to create is so much more important and Zlatan shits on every other striker in our squad at these things.
We'll agree to disagree, Zlatan has been a huge disappointment up to now for me, i couldnt wait to see him in action and have been very underwhelmed.
The thing is, he's pretty much our best performing striker since Van Persie.
It's not all about pace as they say Sally gunnel is a fast runner but I wouldn't want her upfront for us ! Zlatan scares defenders and keeps them occupied .havent seen enough ? Who is our top scorer so far ?Disagree with both of the above. Much preferred seeing a bit of pace and mobility in our attack.
I though both Martial and Rashers were average but I like the pace they bring and I just haven't seen enough from Zlat to suggest he benefits the team.
It's not all about pace as they say Sally gunnel is a fast runner but I wouldn't want her upfront for us ! Zlatan scares defenders and keeps them occupied .havent seen enough ? Who is our top scorer so far ?
Obviously its not all about pace, and its equally not all about scaring defenders otherwise, as in your example, we'd have Mike Tyson playing for us. I also dont believe Zlat does scare defenders, thats exactly what i was hoping to see but he's looked timid up to now, he was bullied by Luiz for example.
Yes indeed, Zlat is our top scorer with 6 goals, which as per my earlier post is underwhelming.
feck me, 165 minutes per goal is underwhelming?
I'd say it's par for a guy like Zlatan but he should really be on 8 goals considering the Burnley and Stoke games :/
Yes you're right, it should be more following those games and hopefully I'm wrong, come the end of the season he'll have hit 20+ goals and we'll be in the top 4.
Where we sit today I just can't see it and I maintain, the return from Zlat (not just in terms of goals) has been below expectations.
We really missed him today. With all those crosses and corners, we would have scored plenty with Zlatan involved.
We had a great game and did pretty much everything right today, but the weakest link by far was the CF position. We are 100% dependent on Zlatan. Rashford and Martial are great, but they are not ready to lead the line.
Definitely think we would've won today if he played (even though he's missed loads the past month), but we definitely would've created more and because of that probably scored more. He picks up great positions in the box and always gets a few good chances to score, plus opening up space for others and offering that aerial threat which we had 0 of today. It's laughable to see people claim that Rashford at 19 is a better option then Zlatan Ibrahimovic, but there you go.
I think his link up play is pretty average he loses the ball quite a lotWell apart from his goals he has acutally exceeded my expectations. His link up play is fantastic.
I think his link up play is pretty average he loses the ball quite a lot
As he did vs Feyenoord, Chelsea, Liverpool? He was quite good against City and scored a nice goal but then again missed a lot of chances including an open goal.I was thinking exactly this. Despite our control and pressure we created too few dangerous situations in the game. On the whole Rashford and Martial proved too lightweight in a game vs a top team, we still need Zlatan to lead the way.
Let's be honest. Against Burnley some shots should have gone in, especially that flying kungfu kick.
As he did vs Feyenoord, Chelsea, Liverpool? He was quite good against City and scored a nice goal but then again missed a lot of chances including an open goal.
It's more than a couple unfortunately, no but he came on and was useless.Jeez man, the couple of matches he's had that wasn't up to standard is proof of, what exactly? Where you happy with our strikers against Arsenal? Also, he didn't start vs Feyenoord, did he?
short term fix to a long term problem - again.
Unhappy about having a world class striker lead the line for the next two years? Strange. Maybe boy wonder Marcus Rashford should be our starting striker every game (even though he was crap against Arsenal and hasn't as yet demonstrated the decision making and link-up play ability that you need to be a top striker). Maybe we should get Lukaku who is crazily overrated, or any other bang average striker, maybe Cavani?
People will complain about anything.