And again you have failed to explain how you interprete your stats. Shots per goal really? Are all shots of equal difficulty? Can you please go more in depth with your analysis of the stats you provided?
You are also completely dismissing the movement of the players, their ability to get themselves in scoring positions, running in behind.
Do you honestly believe they would have kept those ratios had they played more and taken more shots? Swchweinsteiger played like one game and got top ratings, does that mean he would have been as good if he played every game? The same goes for creation stats.
You can post all the per/game stats you want to suit your argument but the reality is Zlatan is our only goal threat and best chance creator, most key passes than any top striker in the league bar Sanchez.
You can keep spouting how Martial and Mikhi were unfairly excluded but the reality is none of our attackers have been up to par hence the heavy rotation.
And yes most of our chances have just fallen to Ibra without him having any part in creating them for himself with his runs and movement, yeah sure. Why does Martial not find himself in better positions to score? Because he's just standing around waiting for the ball to come to him so he can dribble straight into a player.
Funny your accusing people to see what they want to see in stats when you're doing the same. When you say we're only 6 goals better of than last year, are you taking into account that our topscorer last year has failed miserably and Mikhi's been absent for a long time?
Let's see if you ignore my post like you did in the over reliant on Zlatan thread instead if providing some valid arguments.
Wow where do we start....
1) I'm not dismissing the movement of players. Ibra's movement is very good considering he's not very mobile. He does get himself in good positions.
2) The shots missed is a stat that's viewed at the same breath with most goalscoring chances missed, which for Ibra is extremely high. Not all shots are of the same difficulty, but if he's taking shots on that are hard to score from, maybe he shouldn't be taking them on?
3) No they wouldn't have kept the same ratios if they had taken more shots at goal, I already said that. But that doesn't mean they'd miss as many chances as Ibra has. It goes both ways.
4) The reality about Zlatan being our only threat, is based on the fact everyone else plays on the wings so Zlatan can play in the middle. You keep referring to his total stats which considering his game time should undoubtedly be higher. He is the only striker we play through the middle. He's the only striker we never take off. He has more minutes than anyone in the league. His stats against other strikers should be seen on a per 90 mins basis, not totals. You keep making that mistake.
5) Mkhi's and Martial reasons for exclusion have been reportedly that they didn't mark enough, not their goalscoring performance. Or that wouldn't explain Lingard playing. You do seem to know better than anyone though, so I'll have to take your word I guess.
6) Martial's off the ball movement is not great, he needs to improve. Ibra's is much better. Ibra is also the better player to lead the line in this formation that we play. I wouldn't play Martial alone up top. But part of the reason he's not scoring as much as last year, is because he's playing on the wing not up top. He hasn't failed miserably up top, he was never played there by Mou. Stop branding 15 matches on the wing failure to score as much as last year. If he were to play up top it'd be with another striker next to him, not alone. His movement is not good enough to warrant that.
7) It's simple. You keep dismissing everyone else as a failure and building up Zlatan to be something bigger than he is. He is not a prolific goalscorer and we're building our attack too much around him. He misses a lot of chances and it has cost us many times. You think he's some sort of untouchable player (your words) that should never be subbed because apparently he is our only threat. I don't share that view. I think Mourinho needs to work in alternative formations where Ibra is not the only focal point of the attack. Preferably one with two strikers. Because when he's not on form, he's costing us.
Finally, what you don't get, is that I don't have some vendetta with Ibra. I believe he should be starting games for us until we get a better striker. But I don't accept your view that he should be playing every minute and that even if he's crap he needs to stay on. It's that simple.
Have I covered you? I hope so, cause I don't want to have to type all that again.