Ban
New Member
True poachers' goal that one.
I asked in another thread, does anyone know if Zlatan has scored against both Schmeichels.
He wouldn't have, don't think he ever played in the same league as Big Pete.
His only goals against Denmark were in 2015 (scored twice in a 2-2 draw and once in a 2-1 win). It was the two leg qualifier that allowed Sweden to reach the Euros.yeah but Sweden vs Denmark?
yeah but Sweden vs Denmark?
I didn't think of that, was Pete still playing for Denmark after he left us?
His only goals against Denmark were in 2015 (scored twice in a 2-2 draw and once in a 2-1 win). It was the two leg qualifier that allowed Sweden to reach the Euros.
20 goals for the season and he's got a 6.1 rating? Ridiculous. He's been an excellent signing.
I never submit ratings on here, I've done it about 5 times all season as I keep forgetting.
Zlatan on 6.1 Caf average is laughable.
Zlatan doesnt score for 2 games and plays just like the whole team poorly, still one of the top goalscorers in PL, and caf wants him out of the squad. Hes overrated, to old to play in United.
Zlatan scores one goal, everyone talks about how impressive he is.
Sorry but sometimes this forum is really nothing to have when it comes to analyzing players. Two matches without scoring makes a player shit, one match with one goal makes him incredible.
Nice comp of his season so far
Nice comp of his season so far
To be fair that's not a bad way of looking at things. We have lost the same number of games as Chelsea, but the nine draws (compared to Chelsea's two) has killed our season. Goal scoring is a serious issue and has been since Van Persie left. People complaining about Zlatan (He does nothing but score..he's too slow etc) are talking nonsense. Guy's a great player and sets up plenty of chances. He's not the reason we haven't scored more, the other forwards have to step up their game.
So that's 20 goals and 7 assists in 33 games, at 35 years old, in his first season in the Premiership, in a team still finding it's feet under Mourinho
This is just being hyperbolic because you don't agree. Many users have stated many credible things from which they have derived their arguments detailing their views on Zlatan's contribution to our team. Labeling it nonsense does nothing to dispel any arguments that people have made. If the stats back up his low conversion rate then people are more than entitled to investigate and discuss it, regardless.People complaining about Zlatan (He does nothing but score..he's too slow etc) are talking nonsense.
Apparently hes shit..20 goals and 7 assists in 33 appearances. Pretty incredible.
Nice comp of his season so far
Nice comp of his season so far
People have complained about Ibra missing a couple of goalchances but watching this clip shows a lot of "would be" assists made from Ibra if his teammates could have scored. It amazes me that Ibra is still a bit underrated...
Other than Zlatan, who has been very good, the video is basically an infuriating illustration of how poor some of our finishing has been. If we converted about five of our missed chances as we should have, we could well be in 2nd. If you add a few more goals from our weird obsession with hitting the woodwork, we would be within a few points of Chelsea.
He's been great, but also shares some blame for poor finishing. Something too keep in mind is while Zlatan has scored 15 in the PL, he's also missed 12 big chances. The highest in the league. For comparison strikers with similar goals scored Diego Costa, Lukaku and Harry Kane have missed roughly half of that amount 6. The reason why the argument against Zlatan holds some merit is that the whole team is forced to play through him, and relies on him to score most the chances. When the player on your team with the best scoring chances misses roughly 45% of them, its not a surprise we struggle to score. So i think there is something to be said about how Zlatan's inefficiency at converting chances is hurting the team, while individually he's been performing great. Something a manager should look into. I'd try to create more balance with scoring opportunities.
He really is a phenomenal striker. 20 goals in his first season in England at his age, it's just stunning.
It is, in itself, a feat of strength to be at your peak at 35. People expected him to succeed because he's in such brilliant physical condition for his age, and because he's a formidable player. However, it is rare for a 35 to do what he's done, as proven by the fact that he's the oldest player in the Premier League to score 15. So, age is relevant. And his age should rightfully be used to "further enhance his achievements".I see we're allowed to mention his age again now he's done well.
In the buildup to his signing so many said it was irrelevant, that he was at his peak, don't keep going on about it.
Now it's being used to further enhance his achievements:
Why aren't the same people responding to these posts pointing out his age has nothing to do with it?
Freak I don't mean to single you out. Plenty have said the same thing, you're just the most recent.
It is, in itself, a feat of strength to be at your peak at 35. People expected him to succeed because he's in such brilliant physical condition for his age, and because he's a formidable player. However, it is rare for a 35 to do what he's done, as proven by the fact that he's the oldest player in the Premier League to score 15. So, age is relevant. And his age should rightfully be used to "further enhance his achievements".
I agree it is an achievement.
My point is that many posters have gone from saying age is irrelevant, he's at his peak, to saying "wow can't believe he's doing this at 35."
Just a bit of double standards in my opinion. It's either relevant or its not. Can't be both depending on how he performs.