Aboutreika18
Full Member
12-12
Murphy has potted 5 reds and not a single colour!
fecksake Trump does my head in, every time he fecks up he gets away with it, it's quite unbelievable. Murphy has potted some amazing reds here, but has had no luck with positioning.
Same old story with Trump, happens in most matches, don't think I've ever seen a player as lucky as he's been over time.
Still have to hear from Virgo how he's possibly the greatest potter ever or some shit though
The reason I'd have Hendry above him is his application of talent, which is what it boils down to essentially. O'Sullivan can be a 10, 10, 4. Hendry would be 9, 9, 7. He couldn't reach Ronnie's highs, no one can, even Ronnie a lot of the time, which is my point. In terms of talent, it's Ronnie, in terms of applying that talent when it matters to get results i.e. UKs, Worlds etc. it's Hendry.
Still, I'm banking on Ronnie to make it five this year.
I hope Ronnie fecking destroys Trump. Great potter, shit haircut, flukey cnut.
Naughty snooker? feck off
I don't really get the whole O'Sullivan is more naturally talented thing. He dry didn't play snooker until he was 11 and was a professional by 16. O'Sullivan was playing from no age. Hendry revolutionised the way the game was played and led he way for the players of today. The World Championship isn't the same without his presence.
I don't get the hate for Murphy, he seems a decent bloke and a hell of a player. Final frame shootout here. 12-12. Trump is the one who is very arrogant, especially considering he has never won the World title.
I don't buy the boring tag - that was purely because he won everything going (6 World titles by his mid-20s) and denied Jimmy White the title time after time. Boring character yes, but he was an attack-minded player whose aggressive style hastened his decline during his 30s.
Don't necessarily agree the difference is purely mental and that Hendry is inferior as a player. Ronnie didn't get the better of Hendry at a Worlds until he was 30 when Hendry had his cue broken and was years past his best. There's no doubt O'Sullivan's top tournament level is as good as anything we've seen, but it's hard to make an argument that it is distinctly better than what Hendry produced during his 20s.
I don't really get the whole O'Sullivan is more naturally talented thing. He dry didn't play snooker until he was 11 and was a professional by 16. O'Sullivan was playing from no age. Hendry revolutionised the way the game was played and led he way for the players of today. The World Championship isn't the same without his presence.
Ok ok stop bashing me! Playing Trump in 2 hours. Predictions?
4 world titles, the maxium in 5min 20, the other maxium after asking the ref what the high break prize was after potting the first red only. He owns them all. Hendry was a bore compared to him, attacking in his day compared to his rivals or not. That's just the way it is mate and the players Ronnie has too battle, no just the quality but the number of them, is a far higher standard IMO. Especially with the China players I don't think that can be argued.
What would constitute the ultimate snooker player?
One attribute per player.
Break Building: Ronnie O'Sullivan
Long Potting: Mark Williams
Consistency: Mark Selby
Flair: Judd Trump
Temperament: Marco Fu
Rest Shots: Shaun Murphy
Resilience:Graeme Dott
Safety: John Higgins
Anything I've missed out? Do you agree?
Bored of hearing this now from him to be honest. Play or retire.