VAR, Refs and Linesmen | General Discussion

There was the incident near the start of the game where Mazraoui was fouled more than once by the Wolves defender on the edge of the box and the ref gave a goal kick. Also the one where he gave a free to Wolves for what looked like a perfectly fine turn by Amad to get away from his marker on the wing. He was very poor and completely inconsistent.

He also ignored one of the most blatant handballs you will ever see. From Harry Maguire, near the end. I’m not sure he was biased. Just very very poor.
 
I think that was the correct decision. He didn’t try to elbow him and miss. He gestured with his elbow as a kind of “get the feck off me” movement but you could see he deliberately avoided making any contact.

Yeah that's about the only read of the situation that I can understand that could result in him not being sent off. Even then with so much force so near his opponent it's probably a red.

Either way, it's not the chosen argument that Clattenburg was using to defend his mates last night. Instead he was arguing that the rules don't allow a ref to send someone off if they don't make contact, which is just bollocks. I remembered that from a ref course I took 16 years ago, the least we can expect is refs who have reffed at the top level for god knows how long to accurately be able to recite the laws!
 
Yeah that's about the only read of the situation that I can understand that could result in him not being sent off. Even then with so much force so near his opponent it's probably a red.

Either way, it's not the chosen argument that Clattenburg was using to defend his mates last night. Instead he was arguing that the rules don't allow a ref to send someone off if they don't make contact, which is just bollocks. I remembered that from a ref course I took 16 years ago, the least we can expect is refs who have reffed at the top level for god knows how long to accurately be able to recite the laws!

The absolute tripe that “tv refs for hire” come up with to defend their pals is hilarious.
 
Does the FA (or whichever governing body would be responsible) release a list of of "changes" every season?

The ex-ref they had on Amazon last night said that this season the rules changed so that you have to actually make contact for violent conduct to have happened.

Let's assume that he's not talking out of his arse, why on earth did that change need to happen?
 
Does the FA (or whichever governing body would be responsible) release a list of of "changes" every season?

The ex-ref they had on Amazon last night said that this season the rules changed so that you have to actually make contact for violent conduct to have happened.

Let's assume that he's not talking out of his arse, why on earth did that change need to happen?

Sounds like bullshit tbh. Imagine a player clearly swinging a punch at another player's face but the other player dodging it. No card and play on? That wouldn't happen
 
Does the FA (or whichever governing body would be responsible) release a list of of "changes" every season?

The ex-ref they had on Amazon last night said that this season the rules changed so that you have to actually make contact for violent conduct to have happened.

Let's assume that he's not talking out of his arse, why on earth did that change need to happen?

Yep, here:

https://www.thefa.com/football-rule.../football-11-11/2024-25-law-changes-explained

And here for PGMOL:

https://www.premierleague.com/news/4108592

Needless to say, not only is that supposed change not mentioned, the PGMOL guidelines include verbatim the passage from the Laws of the Game stating that a red card shall be given for an attempt to

use or attempt to use excessive force or brutality against an opponent, teammate, team official,m atch official, spectator or any other person, regardless of whether contact is made
 
Sounds like bullshit tbh. Imagine a player clearly swinging a punch at another player's face but the other player dodging it. No card and play on? That wouldn't happen

Roy Keane got a straight red for a swing and a miss at Shearer. Ref only had a yellow in his hand up to that point.

That attempted elbow was absolutely pathetic and even if he didn't get sent off or banned, I'd be dropping that lad to the bench for a month.
 
That's kinda mad that he just made up some utter bullshit to cover for a shitty decision.
Yep, and yet again there’ll be nothing done about it. Just as nothing gets done about them making a giant balls up of the rules they are supposed to implement.
 
I think he should have been red carded but I sort of can see that the fact the other player is already past him can be seen as a mitigating factor here. But if the reason he didn't get carded is that the ref thought contact had to be made he needs sacking.
 
I can’t watch that video but that one above shows yer man has already basically run past him when he swings.

It's still quite a vicious elbow to be throwing. I don't think it can be categorised as trying to get the player away from him or as a "gesture to the referee" which Clattenburg is trying to claim. That just seems like revisionism to back up the refs decision.

I don't see the logic in Clattenburg's statement at all.
Andy Madley is in a very good position. He couldn't have been sent off for the contact but he could have been sent off for the attempted contact. I believe it's a gesture more than an attempted strike.

"I think Joao Pedro makes a gesture to the referee but if he wanted to swing and use brutality he would have swung his arm out and created contact."

He says he could have been sent off for the attempted contact but that if he wanted to make contact he would have made contact, which seems to be circular argument and a bit of an oxymoron.
 


Incredible that Bruno first of all doesn't get a foul that 99% of players in this league would get and then gets booked for a nothing foul which is also his first foul in the game


Could easily have been a foul for Bruno at the start, but he then tries to trip Guedes and fails and then Cunha, fails the first time, gets him the second. It is an easy yellow, isn't going for the ball, just trips him to stop the attack. 3 attempts to bring down the Wolves player.

The Yoro yellow, Cunha skins him, then Yoro takes him down to stop him, again easy yellow. Fans say too early to give a yellow but these are the same fans crying about Elleray stating Hojlund wasn't a penalty in a derby, so context does or does not matter?
 
It's still quite a vicious elbow to be throwing. I don't think it can be categorised as trying to get the player away from him or as a "gesture to the referee" which Clattenburg is trying to claim. That just seems like revisionism to back up the refs decision.

I don't see the logic in Clattenburg's statement at all.


He says he could have been sent off for the attempted contact but that if he wanted to make contact he would have made contact, which seems to be circular argument and a bit of an oxymoron.
Clattenburgs always been a moron.

If Pedro had wanted to make a gesture to the ref, it’d have been a pulling down motion (being as that player pulled his shirt 2/3/4 times). I think he lost it for a split second, lashed out an elbow but caught himself as he started the motion.

But to say the motion/action doesn’t count despite rules to the contrary is just PGMOL making it up on the fly, to protect useless officials… again. With their SKY plant Dermott to back them up.
 
501 pages :lol: Looking at the Joao Pedro incident last night is there any wonder how we’ve managed so many!

It’s outrageous that you can look at that again and decide it isn’t a red card.
 


Incredible that Bruno first of all doesn't get a foul that 99% of players in this league would get and then gets booked for a nothing foul which is also his first foul in the game


Seems pretty clear that the Wolves player gets the ball first and then makes contact with Bruno, unless there's an angle showing that there's contact with Bruno before contact with the ball then it would seem it's a fine decision to let play go on.

He then proceeded to make two weak as feck attempts at winning the ball back, where the only thing he was close to was ankles, before he from behind made the slightest touch.
 
In the current version of football you can't just take out the man in the garb of got the ball, but I guess some of our fans hate Bruno so much now that stuff like this doesn't matter.
 
In the current version of football you can't just take out the man in the garb of got the ball, but I guess some of our fans hate Bruno so much now that stuff like this doesn't matter.

Maybe but I know for myself I am tired of every match thread descending into "The refs are out to get us" hysteria after the first 50/50 call for a throw in on the halfway line goes against Utd.
 
Seems pretty clear that the Wolves player gets the ball first and then makes contact with Bruno, unless there's an angle showing that there's contact with Bruno before contact with the ball then it would seem it's a fine decision to let play go on.

He then proceeded to make two weak as feck attempts at winning the ball back, where the only thing he was close to was ankles, before he from behind made the slightest touch.

Seems pretty clear? I'd say he never touches the ball, only crashes into the side of Bruno as he's trying to control it.

This was happening all game and absolutely drove me mad. Watching that happen so many times, while we get called for the slightest of touches, leaves little room for doubt as to the intention of the ref. He even managed to give us a rare freekick when it was clear that the ball had bounced in our favour with clear grass ahead.
 
Simon Hooper refereeing tomorrow with Paul Tierney on VAR, god help us.