Are people seriously bothered by a manager getting a new contract ? The only difference that makes is it he gets £4m or £6m if he gets fired
Transfer Tweets - Manchester United - 2024/25
- Thread starter mazhar13
- Start date
It's totally normal. There will likely be some sort of role amendments etc which would warrant an amended contract anyway. If they are changing the role title then it will also likely get a new contract by default because you're essentially making the old role redundant.
My current employers have 'given me a new contract' multiple times. For a range of reasons but one was literally just a change in the role title and like I said, that effectively meant the previous role was redundant.
But media use certain words, content creators talk about issues they don't have information or experience with and this drives a narrative that the general population then eat up.
People need to move on. He's our manager - end of story. Time to back him.
What exactly does this mean? Is all discussion forbidden now?
Tier 2:
No not at all. Discussion on the manager's performance should carry on forever. I just mean the constant moaning of the decision that has been made and will now not change - it's counter productive in my opinion.
Oh well..
Didn't Liverpool want Ugarte before he went to Paris? They need an upgrade for Endo.
The other club is obviously Chelsea - they want to be involved in all transfers.
Of course it will, but this is United we don’t do learning from mistakes
In their defence, they were in for him before he went PSG. Then again, who are they not in for at any given point in time.
I was hoping lessons were learned
Each! - that'll teach them.
What would a decent fee be? And would it be worth the points deduction they'd inevitably get for paying it?
Yes. The answer is yes. Please buy them, Everton. Please!
To answer your question: INEOS have changed the way things are run and manager's role in general.
So they need a new legally binding document that reflects all of these changes.
Past the ‘considering’ stage though?
FOMO FC
Both + 25m for JB
Both + 50m for JB & AO!
€30m sounds a fair price.
both have only 1 year left of their contract and have higher wages than clubs normally pay for similar players and they are only squad options for us
Thats to much, Bissaka is still 26, Lindelof would flourish in average team same as Andreas P.
2 for 1
2 for 1
AWB would be great for a Dyche team
If only there was a mutually agreeable situation that involved us getting a player from Everton at the same time....
Swap for Brathwaite.
35 million + Lindelöf. Not selling AWB until we at least have one more full-back in place
Nah, sell him while there is concrete interest in him and figure it out afterwards. Plenty of time to get a replacement.
We don’t have a choice after deciding to keep him. Not giving him one makes it look like we don’t think it’s going to succeed. I’m pretty sure it’ll have break clauses in, for example if he doesn’t make the champions league, there’s minimal compensation.
He's from Uruguay. Chances are he'll say something racist after we've had him a week and we'll have to ban him for half the season.
Surely you see it? Like you hit post, and immediately realised what you’d done?
Huge irony in your post.
Is this a new rule? If not, how do the Red Bull group get around it? Salzburg sold Sesko and Seiwald to Leipzig at the beginning of last season, despite both being in the Champions League.
There must be more to it. City Group and Red Bull have no issues making transfers. Think Watford and Udinese never had issues either.
My guess is we were proposing to do something ridiculously unfair to give us freedom with FFP/PSR. £40m paid across 10 years or something