Plant0x84
Shame we’re aren’t more like Brighton
What’s the tune to this?Eee, hello, what Getafe has to do with this?
He was on loan there.
It is thanks and goodbye for them.
What’s the tune to this?Eee, hello, what Getafe has to do with this?
He was on loan there.
It is thanks and goodbye for them.
Why would we buy a player, on huge money, that doesn’t fit with how we play? There’s a reason we don’t get linked to himWe should go in with a €50m plus Mason Greenwood for Osimhen and tell them we value MG at €65m so that’s a €115m deal and they get the player that’s 2/3 years you gr but we want 25% of any sell on Greenwood!
Let me think about this, the total fee for Zirkzee £47m including Agent Fees or the same plus Greenwood for Osimhen
Greenwood plus Zirkzee Wages are probably £200-250k
Osimhen on £250-300k plus goal bonus !
I thought the Getafe fee was only valid if he was sold whilst he was on loan with them?We'll need to pay 20% of that 50% to Getafe
If we somehow managed to get Yoro, it would probably require a Ream Madrid clause in his contract, as well as some certainty of being a starter for us.
Haven’t seen him play, so not judging hos ability. But if we were to believe that he’s good enough, i’m not necessarily against the idea.
Not saying we should enter feeder-club mentality completely, but it might be worth it in individual cases.
eh? how would that work? It was a short term loan, no one is getting sold during that time.I thought the Getafe fee was only valid if he was sold whilst he was on loan with them?
January transfer window maybeeh? how would that work? It was a short term loan, no one is getting sold during that time.
£30m was always wildly unrealistic for an Italian club.
Because with a negative goal difference and scoring less than 60 PL goals two season running, we need to change the way we attack and score more goals , who better to sharpen Osimhen skills than Ruud Van Nistelroy ?Why would we buy a player, on huge money, that doesn’t fit with how we play? There’s a reason we don’t get linked to him
I thought the Getafe fee was only valid if he was sold whilst he was on loan with them?
Shame it's not that good a source. Seems unattainable, isn't he quite liked at PSG?
Manchester United made an offer for Manuel Ugarte (PSG)
How reliable is this guy? I can't take another season of Casemiro sliding all over the pitch.
Thanks. Here's hoping our interest in him is serious.There was a time when he was very reliable for French news only, but I think I'm right in saying he's around about T2, and maybe slipping.
No one knows. Tanzi didn't report an amount in his article. On the bright side, PSG's open to negotiating a sale for him, so it's not like he's not for sale.Was it for £35m
If your TV remote took 2 batteries and wasn't working, and you changed one of the batteries several times with ones you knew were good, but the remote still didn't work, what would you do? Keep changing that same battery? No, you'd change the other one. Maybe it's time we did that for once.Still completely bonkers to see this happening this might be the ultimate case of rewarding mediocrity that we've ever witnessed.
The manager who finished 8th last season. The manager who set new, unwanted records regularly last season. Who showed no real signs of tactics or ideas. Who allowed 30+ shots on our goal last season. Who had MANCHESTER UNITED on negative goal difference after many humiliating defeats including finishing bottom of the CL group.
This guy gets a new contract, but we want to be where Madrid are? imagine Madrid having standards like this. They would be nowhere near where they are. Crazy times!
Did you watch us in last ten years? He probably got a bigger salary too.Why are we giving ETH a new contract? Surely will come to bite us in the ass when we have to pay him a huge severance fee when we almost inevitably sack him...
Hopefully there are some break clauses in the contract that are favorable towards the clubWhy are we giving ETH a new contract? Surely will come to bite us in the ass when we have to pay him a huge severance fee when we almost inevitably sack him...
Why are we giving ETH a new contract? Surely will come to bite us in the ass when we have to pay him a huge severance fee when we almost inevitably sack him...
Rumoured reasons:
Less influence under new terms, smaller break clause if he fails to achieve targets.
Why's everyone up in arms about a new contract? It doesn't say a longer contract, or more money, and the rumours are that his transfer veto will be removed, and as above, possible break clauses added.Not sure why folks are fretting. He's still under contract, so any new contract is likely going to be in our benefit as much as possible.