15 million is too low. No way you can justify that, should be at least 25 million.
15 million is too low. No way you can justify that, should be at least 25 million.
How about £8.5m which is what they want to pay allegedly?He's on high wages for just a squad player too. On a good day if he was on decent wages you could fetch 25mil give or take but 1 year left on deal 90k plus a week, I think 15mil is good.
Very good tackler and not horrible on the ball. Only 27, good squad option for us, this price makes no sense.So long as they don’t spend 15M to loan a right back on the last day of the window, it’s ok for a one dimensional fullback with a year left on his deal.
If he commits to being a squad option, that’s ok but maybe he sees himself playing more and he can’t get ahead of Dalot. If we get a non sicknote left back next season, there’s even fewer chances as Ten Hag hardly rotates.Very good tackler and not horrible on the ball. Only 27, good squad option for us, this price makes no sense.
Then keep him: we have bigger holes to plug in the squad. It would be a dumb move unless we have a cheap replacement lined up.No one is spending 25 million on him in the last year of his contract whether thats his value or not.
I reckon we will be selling a good few players below value just to move them on.
Then keep him: we have bigger holes to plug in the squad. It would be a dumb move unless we have a cheap replacement lined up.
We don‘t.
He's a square peg in a round hole. Thats not a good squad option.Very good tackler and not horrible on the ball. Only 27, good squad option for us, this price makes no sense.
Every time we finally manage to shift some deadwood, comments like these come up
Not quite. We will have the cash but it's PSR that needs to be considered.Unless you can buy a RB for cheaper than what you sell AWB its a bad idea. We need cash, why take a low fee, and then turn back around and have to spend even more for a squad player.
Hopefully untrue. Should only sell if they pay over the oddsAt that price we shouldn't sell, it's quite obvious I think.
£20 million please.
Scott McTominayIs there any player that Chelsea aren't interested in? Genuine question
He would be their second best player.Scott McTominay
Is there any player that Chelsea aren't interested in? Genuine question
Don‘t agree, he is just better defensively as offensively. His dribbling on the ball is actually quite good.He's a square peg in a round hole. Thats not a good squad option.
Possibly. I don't think they're interested in him though.He would be their second best player.
Haven't seen him playing in France but he always looks below average with Canada. He doesn't look anything special to be honest, not really young either so I don't know what the deal with him. Got decent numbers in league 1 so maybe it's just a case of a player not performing with his country.Tier 2:
He’s one of the lowest paid senior squad membersYeah we could have got more but overall its a good deal IMO. He makes too much money compared to output so it was expected that we would have to take big haircut on the transfer fee. Nearly £5m in annual wages off the books in addition to a fee is decent IMO.
To put his salary into context only McT and Evans get paid less per week from the senior players. Everyone else is on 120k per week or higherHe's on high wages for just a squad player too. On a good day if he was on decent wages you could fetch 25mil give or take but 1 year left on deal 90k plus a week, I think 15mil is good.
Yes and despite what some are saying his wages are not prohibitive. I’d take minimum 17m, anything less and we’ve been shaftedI still wouldn’t sell him for 20 million. For that money surely all the lower clubs in the PL would be queuing up. He’s being undervalued on here. I think he’s worth 25 but realise his contract situation is precarious. At his best he’s a really good player for a team that needs to defend. He’s got a decent injury record and he’s still quite young and he’s very experienced now.