I read somewhere they are exploring buying him but without seeing the German source, could not confirm.Considering Dortmund will want him for free, I suggest they can feck off.
I read somewhere they are exploring buying him but without seeing the German source, could not confirm.Considering Dortmund will want him for free, I suggest they can feck off.
I feel so bad for Mount. I think he's a class player and he seems like a good dude. Shocking fitness record though. We can't catch a break.
Fati in fm 24 still has 185 ability which potentially puts him well ahead of Rashford and on par with someone like Salah or Musiala. Obviously that's meaningless but he had or has crazy potential. The Brighton loan was a disaster for him. He looks to be finished at the very top level if Barca don't want him and he can't make it at Brighton. Maybe in an easier league and build himself back up slowly.
Barcelona cheapskates?The concern is all the clubs linked with Rashford (Milan, Juve, Dortmund, Barca) are cheapskates. All of them will be looking at a loan deal with us paying half of his wages and buy option which they will never exercise.
Whereas atleast the Premier league clubs, Athletico Madrid (sometimes) and PSG and Saudi clubs, the typical clubs which pay good money are not interested.
Have you looked at their recent financial position? They are selling their vip boxes, future revenue and their mother if possible to raise some cash.Barcelona cheapskates?
While spending 60M on Olmo. None of this makes sense, agreed, but they're certainly not adverse to spending moneyHave you looked at their recent financial position? They are selling their vip boxes, future revenue and their mother if possible to raise some cash.
Football Manager? Seriously?
Bild's generally not reliable but do break some news from time to time. In this case, they seem to be on the right track. Tier 2:Not sure of the reliability of Bild
The concern is all the clubs linked with Rashford (Milan, Juve, Dortmund, Barca) are cheapskates. All of them will be looking at a loan deal with us paying half of his wages and buy option which they will never exercise.
Whereas atleast the Premier league clubs, Athletico Madrid (sometimes) and PSG and Saudi clubs, the typical clubs which pay good money are not interested.
Can they buy him? I thought there was a max of two non-EU players a season and they bought Scott and Gilmour.Why can't we convince napoli that we have a world class left sided attacker, England International, that we don't need, and they can have him for 20 million no strings attached
And how would they sign Garnacho?Can they buy him? I thought there was a max of two non-EU players a season and they bought Scott and Gilmour.
Can they buy him? I thought there was a max of two non-EU players a season and they bought Scott and Gilmour.
In Italy there is a max of registering two non-EU players per season, and as you say they've already bought Scott and Gilmour, so they couldn't sign him this seasonCan they buy him? I thought there was a max of two non-EU players a season and they bought Scott and Gilmour.
No idea, maybe wrong. Garnacho had the option of playing for Spain though so maybe that?And how would they sign Garnacho?
If we sell Garnacho and we dont immediately replace him, this club is fecked.
He was born in Spain so maybe has dual nationality, assume that's the loophole as no-one's mentioned that they couldn't sign himAnd how would they sign Garnacho?
I dont know. So my idea would be simply not to sell an important player.Who would you replace him with?
I dont know. So my idea would be simply not to sell an important player.
I think Garna has a Spanish passport as he was born in Madrid, I could be wrong thoughAnd how would they sign Garnacho?
If I recall, his mother is Spanish, and his father is ArgentineanGarnacho most likely still has his Spanish passport as he was born in Spain. He wouldn't need to give it up when he got his Argentinean passport as he was a Spanish citizen by birth.
If the club are selling a talented player for 50 Mill then it's their job to know who to replace him with. Their scouting network is larger.I agree, however where is the money coming from?
Not sure of the reliability of Bild
Fair enough, would make sense!He was born in Spain so maybe has dual nationality, assume that's the loophole as no-one's mentioned that they couldn't sign him
Can they buy him? I thought there was a max of two non-EU players a season and they bought Scott and Gilmour.
And how would they sign Garnacho?
No idea, maybe wrong. Garnacho had the option of playing for Spain though so maybe that?
He was born in Spain so maybe has dual nationality, assume that's the loophole as no-one's mentioned that they couldn't sign him
I believe it’s per window rather than per seasonGarnacho most likely still has his Spanish passport as he was born in Spain. He wouldn't need to give it up when he got his Argentinean passport as he was a Spanish citizen by birth.
That wouldn't make sense. Which other non-EU player has Milan signed this January?I believe it’s per window rather than per season
But that’s the crux of the issue. Rashford is on such large wages and the club are in such a tricky financial position in terms of rebuilding the squad that much of the power lies with Rashford, whether you like it or not. If buying clubs aren’t willing or able to match a player’s wage expectations, the selling club is left with a tough choice. Keep an unhappy player on huge wages who isn’t contributing, till he runs down his contract and leaves for free, or try and recover some of their losses. Especially with the financial situation we’re in at the moment, if getting all of his wages off the books isn't possible then getting half of his wages off the books may still make financial sense if it allows the club to bring in a different player on lower wages who will contribute more.
I believe it’s per window rather than per season
Sounds like it was around 60-70 million.Wonder what our Valutaion was?