Swedish_Plumber
Full Member
Complete non article really
Yeah….. this is all bollocks
Typical Jamie Jackson, 2+2 = 72.Just sell everyone then we won't have trouble with PSR
We’ve gone from signing all these players this month to suddenly needing to sell the family silver.
Yeah….. this is all bollocks
Tier 2:
AC Milan, Rashford remains the big market target. A loan with a purchase option has been proposed by Manchester United. BVB are also interested in him.
That's a pretty impressive list. Zaha would have worked out if he'd been played, so really only Sanchez was a total bust. Maybe we should do all our business in January!Have a vague recollection of Henrik Larsson on loan, Mata, Saha, Vidic and Evra as well...oh yes and Amad. If anything our transfers in january (the big transfers - not the youngster-transfers) have generally been a much bigger success than our summer transfers.
The only real misses we made in january were Zaha and a certain Alexis Sanchez.
Source (Tier 1):
At this time, only the Saudi clubs are interested in acquiring Rashford permanently. Since Rashford's not interested in them, he can only join another European club on loan. An option or an obligation makes it easier for AC Milan to commit to the initial loan whilst giving United a chance to make some money on the player should he impress at Milan.Why would we propose option to buy?Isn't obligation to buy better?
Option to buy,what if he doesn't impress like Martial at sevilla, we will still have him here at the end of the seasonAt this time, only the Saudi clubs are interested in acquiring Rashford permanently. Since Rashford's not interested in them, he can only join another European club on loan. An option or an obligation makes it easier for AC Milan to commit to the initial loan whilst giving United a chance to make some money on the player should he impress at Milan.
Urgh grim news.
Not because it's true and will happen, just that we're so mismanaged that we even have to worry about PSR considering our historic revenue generation. Spunked SO much cash on utter bollocks over the years.
Ironically, I can see us not selling anyone until the summer.
Ornstein doesn't clickbait. Maybe just take what's being said at face valueVery obvious a source from the club has just mentioned that no one is truly untouchable should the need to sell become vital to the clubs sustainability. And it’s just being used to clickbait fans.
We'll be selling players we haven't even signed yet at this rate.
Tomorrow Amorim is for sale
Unfortunately Man Utd are the ultimate click bait subject.All this screams click bait bollocks, we will not be selling core players that we wouldn't be able to afford to replace.
Say we sold Mainoo, Nacho & Hojlund for 200m, we'd realistically only have 150m to replace them, it's, not, happening...
Source (Tier 1):
Why does Rashfords brother have a different surname?
Care? Nah, curious? Little bit..Why do you care?
Ornstein doesn't clickbait. Maybe just take what's being said at face value
It's clearly not about Mainoo.I have to admit it is a bit worrying that the club is pushing such a story to the most credible journo, maybe a negotiation tactic with Mainoo's agent but leaves an impression that the finances and PSR are currently prioritised over sporting success.
Jesus typical of you to react like that poster was only asking a question ffs.Why do you care?
Why does Rashfords brother have a different surname?
Why do you care?
Jesus typical of you to react like that poster was only asking a question ffs.
Why would we propose option to buy?Isn't obligation to buy better?
I think it is important for the cultural reset of the club to let everyone know, regardless of who they are, they have to fight for their place in the team/club in the future. You either play and help the team to win games consistently, or you are of no use to the club.
Indicating to a 19yo with a promising first 10 months or so in the first team that he is untouchable at a club like Manchester United would risk taking away the incentives for him to keep pushing to improve.