unchanged_lineup
Tarheel Tech Wizard
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2014
- Messages
- 17,367
- Supports
- Janet jazz jazz jam
Innnnnteresting
As Mueller begins investigating Russia’s interference in last year’s election and its possible links to Donald Trump’s campaign, he is quietly recruiting lawyers and staff to the team. And in recent days, Trump associates have stepped up criticism of Mueller and his team—including a report, quickly rejected by the White House, that Trump is considering firing Mueller before he even gets started.
Tuesday morning on Good Morning America, Newt Gingrich blasted Mueller and his still-forming team. “These are bad people,” Newt Gingrich told George Stephanopoulos. “I’m very dubious of the team.”
But that criticism flies in the face of widespread, bipartisan acclaim for the team. In fact, just a day earlier, on the same program, former Whitewater prosecutor Ken Starr praised Mueller at length. “I don’t think there’s a legitimate concern about Bob Mueller,” Starr said, explaining that the former FBI director was “honest as the day is long.”
From the list of hires, it’s clear, in fact, that Mueller is recruiting perhaps the most high-powered and experienced team of investigators ever assembled by the Justice Department. His team began with three lawyers who also quickly left WilmerHale, the law firm where Mueller has also worked since he left the FBI in 2013—Zebley, James Quarles III, and Jeannie Rhee.
The rapid recruitment of Quarles attracted immediate attention: A famed litigator who was an assistant special prosecutor for the Watergate investigation, Quarles specialized in campaign finance research for the Watergate task force, which surely will be an area of focus for Mueller’s investigation.
CNN up to speed as usual
Trump will fire Mueller, no? What's he got to lose at this stage?
Trump will fire Mueller, no? What's he got to lose at this stage?
I don't get Gingrich's character assassinations, outside of him just being an angry asshole. I presume a) he's very close/loyal to Trump (and the wife job thing), and/or b) he's sweating his name showing up in an investigation.
Trump will fire Mueller, no? What's he got to lose at this stage?
It's not quite that simple.
1. Trump himself cannot fire Mueller. It has to be done by the Attorney General, Jeff Sessions.
2. Sessions has recused himself from all things Russia, so the task would then fall to his Deputy, Rod Rosenstein.
3. Rosenstein has said he won't fire Mueller while he is still in the job unless there is a "good cause", which is an actual legal definition.
4. Therefore Trump would have to fire Rosenstein and replace him with an obedient sycophant who is willing to fire Mueller.
5. If Trump were to initiate the firing of Mueller by doing all those things, the Congress would then reinstitute the independent counsel statute that would restart the process (probably with Mueller in charge again), this time in an independent council role that Trump can't affect.
6. If all of these things happened, it would be so blatantly obvious that Trump is guilty of obstructing justice, that the Congress would overwhelmingly vote to impeach. Even the most hardcore Republicans would not be able to withstand the crushing public pressure to get rid.
It's not quite that simple.
1. Trump himself cannot fire Mueller. It has to be done by the Attorney General, Jeff Sessions.
2. Sessions has recused himself from all things Russia, so the task would then fall to the Deputy, Rod Rosenstein.
3. Rosenstein has said he won't fire Mueller while he is still in the job unless there is "good cause", which is an actual legal definition and not some arbitrary nonsense conjured up in Trump's head.
4. Therefore Trump would have to fire Rosenstein and replace him with an obedient sycophant who is willing to fire Mueller.
5. If Trump were to initiate the firing of Mueller by doing all those things, the Congress would then reinstitute the independent counsel statute that would restart the process (probably with Mueller in charge again), this time in an independent council role that Trump can't affect.
6. If all of these things happened, it would be so blatantly obvious that Trump is guilty of obstructing justice, that the Congress would overwhelmingly vote to impeach. Even the most hardcore Republicans would not be able to withstand the crushing public pressure to get rid.
Is Sessions recusal legally binding and non-negotiable?
Or can he do what Nunes has done and nitpick what he meant when everyone thought he recused from the Russia probe?
As we're about to reach page 1000 of this thread, things are finally turning to the better. Question to the legal minds: Could this realistically be the end of king Joffrey's time in the white house?
It's not legally binding but it would obliterate his credibility to zero if he reversed his recusal just to do Trump's dirty bidding. Both Sessions and Trump would likely be under investigation at that point because it would be obvious that Sessions was legally culpable of obstructing justice on Trump's behalf.
After all that's happened, it just wouldn't surprise me if Sessions got involved. They just dont care about looking guilty or obstructing justice.
the End game may be Trump pardoning everyone before resigning and having Pence pardon him.
I doubt Pence would do that. He certainly would be under no obligation to do so if Trump was blatantly guilty.
the End game may be Trump pardoning everyone before resigning and having Pence pardon him.
the GOP base?
mind he is a crazy libetarian.
What if Pence is involved too?
Even if he isn't, his association with Trump puts him in legal jeopardy. As in, if he was in meetings where Trump talked about shutting down the investigation then he has legal exposure.
I still think it's going to be easier to tie him to some financial corruption than the Russia collusion. So might take a while once they go over all his taxes. The obstruction of justice could be the play but I trust his awful financials to do the job.As we're about to reach page 1000 of this thread, things are finally turning to the better. Question to the legal minds: Could this realistically be the end of king Joffrey's time in the white house?
I doubt Pence would do that. He certainly would be under no obligation to do so if Trump was blatantly guilty.
Yes of course, like an accomplice because he didn't report witnessing illegal activity? I get that. If that is the case though then him lining himself up for the Presidency is kind of a waste of time really isn't it? I completely agree that is what he has been thinking and doing though. I just wonder how long it has been his plan? If we are perfectly honest here Trump must repulse every bone in his body, and for someone who wont even be alone with another woman in any situation he must be constantly at complete odds with himself. I think Pence must be able to rationalise it by telling himself that the ends justify the means and that him passing laws he believes in will make up for what and who he has aligned himself with and to what he has been complicit in.
Pence has been almost unseen or heard from since the election really, even then he was pretty subdued as a running mate. I definitely think he's kept himself under the radar just waiting for the right moment to make his move. Was that his plan all along though? Did he really think Trump had a chance? I reckon he only accepted the VP slot to gain exposure for his own career and maybe him running himself in 2020, or do you think he honestly thought Trump had a chance? Maybe hedging his bets either way? Whatever, for such a religious man who obviously has such a strict moral code (ironic isn't it?) Trump, his lifestyle, his past, the way he acts and speaks, all of it must make him wish he was Catholic so he go to confession.
I still think it's going to be easier to tie him to some financial corruption than the Russia collusion. So might take a while once they go over all his taxes. The obstruction of justice could be the play but I trust his awful financials to do the job.
Problem may be if Trump gets booted out, but doesn't go to jail and tries to run some crazed 2020 run, or puts a surrogate in his place. Hell, even just slating the Republicans on a regular basis may be enough; his popularity ratings are dreadful but a former President raving about how awful his former party is would not be helpful for them at all.
I think if Trump gets impeached he will be done. He'll be 74 in 2020 and the country will have moved on from its Trump fatigue.
He's a vengeful man though, and if Pence and the GOP are willing to let him sink he'll do all he can to bring them down. Even Trump standing, or a Trump-endorsed candidate, could do enough to wreck the GOP campaign if he pinches, say, 5% or so of the vote. I'm not sure they'd want to risk that. Especially if, now he's been on the inside, he's got a lot of dirt on them all and threatens to release it if he thinks he's going down anyway.