The Trump Presidency | Biden Inaugurated

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm actually more troubled for the gullible sheep who rather than doing their own research, came to a football forum to read my views on the US presidential elections for comfort or reassurance as to who might win.

:lol: you're the one who championed yourself as the expert and attacked those who didn't agree with you. So now it's 'don't listen to me, I don't know nuthin'?"
 
At least in NY there is widespread acceptance of it as way of life. There's even support for it as many of low wage jobs that most Americans don't usually go for are filled up by them.

See, that's your problem. Just like white supremacists and republicans live in their own little bubble...those of us living on the coasts (east or west) also live in our own little bubble. Apparently, there is a whole other America, which doesn't quite feel the same way and are suffering from 'economic anxiety' :lol:

Because as we all know - Kansas is a very popular destination for Illegal Immigrants :lol:
 
I think they just assumed that you had your finger on the pulse of American opinion, you're right that they're gullible if that's the only avenue if news they had but it's evident that opposing views from the predominant narrative were shot down quite quickly in the election thread, it's why I kept my pessimistic mouth shout for the duration of the campaign.

I did, in the sense that my candidate won more votes. The trouble here is that there were people who visited the thread to have their anxieties soothed by comforting views that Hillary was a sure bet to win.
 
:lol: you're the one who championed yourself as the expert and attacked those who didn't agree with you. So now it's 'don't listen to me, I don't know nuthin'?"

Really ? Care to find the post where I championed myself as an "expert" ?
 
See, that's your problem. Just like white supremacists and republicans live in their own little bubble...those of us living on the coasts (east or west) also live in our own little bubble. Apparently, there is a whole other America, which doesn't quite feel the same way and are suffering from 'economic anxiety' :lol:

Because as we all know - Kansas is a very popular destination for Illegal Immigrants :lol:

My point being, I fail to see why this should be accepted as way of life. For me immigration must be carefully controlled, esp as it has implications from unemployment to domestic security to ensuring basic human rights for those immigrating. If there really is a market in US for low wage jobs, then maybe Govt must introduce a new visa type to cater to those.

I would tackle the problem in two phases: (1) to ensure that new illegal immigration is stopped/curtailed as much as possible and (2) old illegal immigrants who have been year for years. Point 1 should be simple enforcement, where Point 2 is more complex with steps to ensure they get assimilated into system and legalized with only the real criminal elements getting the boot. The mass deportation stuff is nonsense.

But then, I still find it hard to grasp the problem conceptually.
 
Na bro, you're way way more optimistic than me:lol:

We both called it for Trump, along with @Americano I don't recall anyone else here making that (100% correct) call. People should listen to us more!

(And optimistic is not how I'd describe myself, I'm in the camp that sees these things in terms of a flow of action<>reaction).
 
My point being, I fail to see why this should be accepted as way of life. For me immigration must be carefully controlled, esp as it has implications from unemployment to domestic security to ensuring basic human rights for those immigrating. If there really is a market in US for low wage jobs, then maybe Govt must introduce a new visa type to cater to those.

I would tackle the problem in two phases: (1) to ensure that new illegal immigration is stopped/curtailed as much as possible and (2) old illegal immigrants who have been year for years. Point 1 should be simple enforcement, where Point 2 is more complex with steps to ensure they get assimilated into system and legalized with only the real criminal elements getting the boot. The mass deportation stuff is nonsense.

But then, I still find it hard to grasp the problem conceptually.

Enforcement is up -

Obama from 2009 to Jan 2016 deported 2.5mil people. That's 25% more than Bush.

And when his final tally is done, he'll have deported more than any president from 1892 to Bush!

But, this runs counter to the fear mongering of the the Far Right..no, wait, the Far-Right is the Right now.
 
And when his final tally is done, he'll have deported more than any president from 1892 to Bush!

But, this runs counter to the fear mongering of the the Far Right..no, wait, the Far-Right is the Right now.

Trump has done a masterful job in giving the people a specific target for their gripes. "Oh, you are unemployed...it must be the Chinese and Mexicans. Oh, you are scared of the shootings, it must be the Muslims"
 
We both called it for Trump, along with @Americano I don't recall anyone else here making that (100% correct) call. People should listen to us more!

(And optimistic is not how I'd describe myself, I'm in the camp that sees these things in terms of a flow of action<>reaction).

Did you call Trump winning Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, and Florida ? If so that's quite impressive. If not then it was just a punt, since Hillary won over a million more votes than Trump, which sort of undercuts the populist/Brexit hypothesis. If this was an up or down popular vote like Brexit was then Hillary would be President.
 
Enforcement is up -

Obama from 2009 to Jan 2016 deported 2.5mil people. That's 25% more than Bush.

And when his final tally is done, he'll have deported more than any president from 1892 to Bush!

But, this runs counter to the fear mongering of the the Far Right..no, wait, the Far-Right is the Right now.

Neither side likes the bring that up because it does not make Obama look like the progressive he is painted as and because it does not fit into the soft label Republicans try to put on him.
 
Did you call Trump winning Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, and Florida ? If so that's quite impressive. If not then it was just a punt, since Hillary won over a million more votes than Trump, which sort of undercuts the populist/Brexit hypothesis. If this was an up or down popular vote like Brexit was then Hillary would be President.

1.4mil and counting :(
 
Did you call Trump winning Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, and Florida ? If so that's quite impressive. If not then it was just a punt, since Hillary won over a million more votes than Trump, which sort of undercuts the populist/Brexit hypothesis. If this was an up or down popular vote like Brexit was then Hillary would be President.

Relax @Raoul, I wasn't being serious, my prediction did after all come with the caveat that I don't know much about American domestic politics (seems like that was an asset this time around though).
 
Neither side likes the bring that up because it does not make Obama look like the progressive he is painted as and because it does not fit into the soft label Republicans try to put on him.
He offset that with things like DACA not to mention, a lot of this is about tonality and optics.

Most sane people regardless of political affiliation should be against illegal immigration.
 
Relax @Raoul, I wasn't being serious, my prediction did after all come with the caveat that I don't know much about American domestic politics (seems like that was an asset this time around though).

I'm quite relaxed. Just making a point that the blanket comparison to Brexit or populism sweeping the globe was not entirely applicable to the popular vote results in the US.
 
Did you call Trump winning Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, and Florida ? If so that's quite impressive. If not then it was just a punt, since Hillary won over a million more votes than Trump, which sort of undercuts the populist/Brexit hypothesis. If this was an up or down popular vote like Brexit was then Hillary would be President.
We didn't necessarily mean that we knew how the individual states would vote, I mean we're Brits after all (one of the reasons so many took your opinions to be gospel), what we've both been saying is that the whole world has been moving to the right of the political spectrum alot more than Joe average cares to notice or admit.
 
I'm quite relaxed. Just making a point that the blanket comparison to Brexit or populism sweeping the globe was not entirely applicable to the popular vote results in the US.

Well since Brexit's another question I'm not very clued up on, I'll defer to you there.

I've never argued that populism is 'sweeping the globe', but there is an obvious global pattern right now of strongman populist nationalist leaders with genuine mass support coming to or maintaining themselves in power - Putin, Modi, Erdogan, Duterte, Netanyahu to a certain extent, etc. This doesn't mean that Russia, India, Turkey, Philippines and Israel aren't extremely internally divided, nor does it mean that this type of leader is somehow destined to prevail everywhere. It's just a reflection of this very particular moment of history we're living in where guys like these seem to know what it takes to win, and it'll be a few years before the reaction against them kicks in as it surely will.

We didn't necessarily mean that we knew how the individual states would vote, I mean we're Brits after all (one of the reasons so many took your opinions to be gospel), what we've both been saying is that the whole world has been moving to the right of the political spectrum alot more than Joe average cares to notice or admit.

:nono:
 
I refresh the spreadsheet at least 20 times a day :lol: Not that I'm obsessed or can't let go...
Cali still had 3mil votes to be counted a couple of days ago :lol:

I'm actually over it. I hated Hillary - voted for her because a non vote/third party vote or a write in was in effect a vote for Trump.
 
Well since Brexit's another question I'm not very clued up on, I'll defer to you there.

I've never argued that populism is 'sweeping the globe', but there is an obvious global pattern right now of strongman populist nationalist leaders with genuine mass support coming to or maintaining themselves in power - Putin, Modi, Erdogan, Duterte, Netanyahu to a certain extent, etc. This doesn't mean that Russia, India, Turkey, Philippines and Israel aren't extremely internally divided, nor does it mean that this type of leader is somehow destined to prevail everywhere. It's just a reflection of this very particular moment of history we're living in where guys like these seem to know what it takes to win, and it'll be a few years before the reaction against them kicks in as it surely will.



:nono:
? You're not British? :eek:
 
HRC won by 2.5m votes in California alone, so in the rest of the entire USA she is actually behind by 1.1m.....lol

Why do so many Americans care about one state so much?
It's almost like it's a massive population centre, which tend to vote Democratic.

Can we ignore all the ex-confederate states and tally up the electoral votes without those?
 
HRC won by 2.5m votes in California alone, so in the rest of the entire USA she is actually behind by 1.1m.....lol

Why do so many Americans care about one state so much?

Well, yes, eliminating the biggest state which inhabits a considerable portion of America's population will tend to change the result.
 
Ah shit mate, I'm so sorry for the insult...

Ha it's no insult at all, easy mistake to make and I'm not one to give a shite about historical bitterness. Plus I actually love being in the UK when I'm there.
 
The complexities of guarding the border against illegal immigrants

What is often lost in the debate about border control is the dramatic change in who is trying to migrate. The number of Mexicans caught trying to illegally cross has been dropping — from more than 400,000 in fiscal 2010 to about 177,000 this year. Meanwhile the number of migrants from violence-plagued El Salvador, Honduras and Guatemala has nearly quadrupled in the same period, to almost 179,000.

U.S. courts have already ruled that asylum seekers can’t be held simply to deter other migrants from coming. And “you can’t get rid of the due-process proceedings,” said Lorilei Williams, director of the immigration unit at Staten Island Legal Services, in New York. Asylum applicants are generally entitled to court hearings under the terms of international law.

[Inside the administration’s $1 billion deal to detain Central American asylum seekers]

A big increase in judges would take time and money. Rep. Henry Cuellar (D), who represents the Texas border and received budgetary approval for 55 more immigration judges in fiscal 2016, said it was unrealistic to think the courts could quickly accelerate their processing of cases.

“Right now, we’re backlogged half a million [cases] with the current judges that we have,” he said in an interview. “Practically, you’re talking about years and years” to process those cases.

Full Article: https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...9-11e6-8f19-21a1c65d2043_story.html?tid=sm_tw
 
Does Trump understand that his experience as a businessman - that he can do whatever he wants, declare bankruptcy and then walk away - is not going to work for the US? I wonder if he thinks defaulting on the US debt is this amazing idea he had that nobody else had ever considered, that is going to magically allow him to wipe the financial slate clean and start again, without any serious implications?

It sounds ludicrous but there is part of me that thinks that really might be his masterplan.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.